|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
v.11 - This concept of God repenting him that he had done certain things [here, v.35, Gen.6:6, etc] is one which I am sure we have all struggled with from time to time. If it were not for Ps.110:4 and similar passages, we may feel that he would even repent that he had made you and me. Men may let us down (and do regularly) but God's covenant is truly binding on both sides. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
v.22 - A recurring theme in the Scriptures is the fact that Yahweh does not want animal sacrifices. This is not to be taken to indicate that he did not institute sacrifices. He did, but they were added to remind Israel of their sinfulness, and not primarily as a means of pleasing Yahweh. [Jeremiah 7:21 - 23] However Israel saw the offering of sacrifices as a virtue in themselves and forgot that the offering of the sacrifice was an advertisement of their sinfulness. Samuel had to reprove Saul on this point. Saul spared the Amalekites, in direct contravention of the word of Yahweh on the flimsy pretext that the people saved the animals alive to offer to the Lord. Saul lost the throne because he saw a virtue in sacrifice rather than obedience. [1Samuel 15:22 - 24] This principle can be seen in other parts of Scripture [Psalm 51:16 17 Proverbs 21:3 Isaiah 1:11 - 17 Hosea 6:6 Amos 5:21 - 24] Jesus reinforced this point be appealing to some of those Scriptures to show that the leaders of his day had also missed the point. [Matthew 9:13 12:7 23:23] However David understood that Yahweh wanted obedience. [Psalm 40:6 - 8] David was a pattern of what Jesus was to be like [Hebrews 10:5 - 9] Nor is the principle unrelated to our walk in Christ as we are to be living sacrifices [Romans 12:1 - the end of the letter] Our obedience is to the constraints of the gospel, some of which are laid out in the remainder of the letter. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.3
- The instruction Saul is given here is not just for him in his circumstances
in his day but for all of us. To follow God effectively, we must each utterly
destroy that in our lives which might turn us from Him. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 15:3
The command to go and utterly destroy Amalek was a consequence of the comment
(Exodus
17:14) which was a direct result to the way that they had treated Israel in
the wilderness. Therefore Saul should have been even the more zealous to perform
the word of God. Hence his disobedience is even more astonishing. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| GO ALL THE
WAY It is easy to fall into the same trap as Saul when what we want conflicts with what God wants. Saul was given instructions as to what God wanted him to do. It wasn't as if Saul completely rebelled, rather, he just carried out Gods instructions as far as he thought he needed to (or maybe, wanted to). In other words, what Saul did was to water down God's commandments until it suited himself, without completing the work God had given him to do. Then Saul justified himself by giving upright sounding reasons to cover his lack of obedience. So instead of totally destroying the Amelekites, as he was commanded to do, he saved the best with the excuse that he was going to sacrifice it to God. When Saul's excuse failed to convince Samuel, he made more excuses, blaming his men for his actions. The lesson for us is that we must do what is completely right - even if we don't like it or think it is needed. Only doing part of what we should is as bad as rebellion. And we can't fool God when it comes to making excuses for our action or lack of action. He knows the real motives of our heart, no matter how fine our excuses might sound. When we obey, let's go the whole way and complete the work God has given us. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| :7
This is the only mention geographically, of Havilah outside Genesis 2 - which
is before the flood. So we ask. Are the place names that are given in early Genesis
as they were after the flood or is Havilah in the days of Saul in the same place
as it was before the flood? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 15:9 Sparing Agag in battle - a problem here - was also seen in the people (Num 31:13-15) when the Midianitish women were spared. Saul, with this Biblical example, should have known better. Obeying the word of God precisely rather than allowing human feelings to get in the way is difficult. We are no different. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.22 Please God with sacrifices? Why not please Him with obedience. What good are these formalities if you have no real intention to do His will? It is obedience that matters; far more than all the multitude of offerings one can talk about. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Saul was a liar and a cheat. His crimes were against God. The huge lesson we should take from this chapter is in 1Sam 15:22: "To obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams." David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
V.3 Yahweh's instructions to Saul via Samuel were very clear. But, Saul disobeyed: his rebellion was equated with witchcraft that carried a death penalty; while his arrogance was likened to idolatry (v.23; Exo 22:18). We should learn from Saul's mistakes not take Yahweh's instruction lightly. Paul tells us that witchcraft and idolatry are works of the flesh (Gal 5:20). Furthermore he equates idolatry with covetousness (Col 3:5). And so, we must be careful to obey the Word so that the Lord can say about us what he said about the ecclesia at Philadelphia (Rev 3:8). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
V.33 Every year as read this chapter, We are inpressed with Samuel, as he called to have Agag brought before him, and then went about fulfilling the commandment of God to slay him. What a lesson in obedience for the Children of Israel and for us to day. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
If we are followers of the living God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the Father of Jesus Christ, and we take His word the bible as being our whole guide to life, where do verses 31-33 fit in to our lives? As an act of worship before God, Samuel, His chosen spiritual leader, hacked a man to pieces. How often have we taken a moral from an old testament story and applied it in our lives? How often have we copied the act of someone in scripture and assumed it was right in God's sight simply because it was right on that occassion in scripture? Surely this incident demonstrates that we have to be very dilligent in studying the context of the examples we see in scripture. Through misinterpretation of context, followers of the bible have in the past persecuted other men and women, and could do again. Samuel's act of devotion was in obedience to God's commandment that a nation be utterly destroyed. God who can see into the heart and mind of every man had found only evil in this nation of Amalekites. Thus, having been given the commandment to destroy them utterly, Saul should have simply got on with it trusting that God knew what He was doing, rather than trusting his own instincts. Samuel's action was as a direct result of Saul's insistence that Samuel "return with me, that I may worship the LORD your God". Samuel was demonstrating graphically that one cannot worship God unless one does His will. Saul thought that to worship God was to approach before His altar, whereas Samuel demonstrated that it was by obedience to His word, however unsavoury that worship may seem at the time. And so it is with us. No matter what we do in acts of worship, praise, or devotion, it is all meaningless and useless if we do not read and keep the word of the LORD (Prov 8:12-15, 28:9, Ecc 12:13). We should also be aware, as Saul should have been, that the way of the LORD is almost always the opposite of the way we feel is most logical (1Cor 3:18-20). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
15:1 Notice the emphasis ‘hearken’ ‘voice’ ‘words’ – Saul was not a listener! Are we? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
15:2 Saul seemed to have forgotten what Amalek had done and what God had commanded – Exo 17:8, Deut 25:17-19 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
15:3 If Saul had kept this commandment then we would not have had the odd claim by the Amalakite that he had killed Saul – 2Sam 1:8 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.8 Agag (meaning fiery) was a title of the kings of the Amalekites, just as Pharoah was a title for the kings of Egypt. Amalekites were often called Agagites such as Haman (Est 3:1,10; 8:3,5). Had Saul followed Yahweh's commands, Haman would not have existed. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
15:4 The comment that Saul ‘numbered;’ the people indicates that he thought the battle was his and not God’s. God can save by few or many. As Jonathan had already said - 1Sam 14:6 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.6 The Kenites were a branch of the Midianites that derived from Midian, a son of Abraham by Keturah (Gen 25:1,2). Jethro, Moses father-in-law was a Kenite (Judg 1:16). The Amalekites were a Hamitic people who had been troublesome to Israel ever since it left Egypt (Exo 17:8). V.24 Saul chose to listen to, and obey the voice of the people rather than listen to, and obey the voice of Yahweh. This caused Saul’s rejection by Yahweh (v.26). We are faced with the same choice: if we listen to God’s voice (through His Word, the Bible), and obey, we shall live (forever); but if we listen to the voice of men (the world), and follow their path, we will die (forever). V.33 Samuel was a Levite. He was not of the sons of Aaron, and yet he offered sacrifices to Yahweh (e.g. 1Sam 7:9). Samuel portends the Redeemed of Christ who will be priests in the Kingdom (Rev 1:6; 5:10). The brethren of Christ, both Jew and Gentile, are called from all parts of the world. Those accepted at the judgment will become the Redeemed. This special priest order will help Jesus put down the enemies of Yahweh, just as Samuel dispensed with Agag. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
15:5 We see a nice characteristic of Saul here in the way he treated the Kenites We see that it was not just that Moses’ father in law among the Kenites had been supportive of Israel. For it was through the Kenites that Sisera was slain – Judg 4:17 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1Sam 13:13 - Samuel reminds Saul that the Lord has been his (Saul's) God. 1Sam 15:30 - but here we find a rejected Saul sadly referring to God as being Samuel's ("your God" NIV) God - not unlike the Israelites who also disappointed God (1Sam 12:19,20,25). We have a paradox with "repent"[Heb. "nacham" (5162) various meanings including "repent, suffer grief, be consoled, be comforted, to be sorry, regret, to sigh, be moved to pity, to avenge", etc.]. 1Sam 15:29,35 - v.29 reads "...the Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he is not a man, that he should repent." But six verses later we read v.35 "...the Lord repented that he had made Saul over Israel." There is no inconsistency here, it just depends which particular sense of the word "nacham" is being referred to in each case. For example, perhaps v.29 refers to "be consoled, be comforted, change his mind" while v.35 could refer to "suffered grief". Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.10
- This is the state from which we have been called to the light of the gospel.
Let us be sure that this is not us. Constant daily contact with and meditation
on the Word will ensure that we remain within our calling - the right light [ch.2:5]
not the wrong light [ch.50:11].
See also 1John
1:7, Rev.21:24. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.2
- Continuing the theme of release from bondage and the day of atonement Yahweh
explains that despite His outstretched arm to save the sins of the people had
separated the people from Him. Notice the order. We are separated from Him, not
the other way round. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.9
- The language here is in stark and direct contrast to that of ch.9:2.
Constantly God's word reminds us of the side of the fence on which we should abide.
Daily our reading of it reminds us of the attitudes that God will and will not
accept. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| There is an amazing
contrast in this chapter.
59:7
has men running to shed blood The contrast marks the needs of man and the wonderful provision of our Father. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :2
It is our actions that estrange us from God, not the other way round. So we have
caused the breach but God is seeking the reconciliation! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 59:10 In saying 'We grope for the wall like the blind' Isaiah is quoting the curse of Deut 28:29 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.10 "grope" The Hebrew GASHASH 1659 means to feel about. There are other instances in scripture which help us to relate to what the prophet is saying.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.2 Israel has been separated from God through sin. Because of sin, Israel would grope around like a blind man (v.10). Jesus illustrates this condition when he healed the blind man in John 9:5-7. Here the man would have to grope half-way around town to the pool of Siloam (see my comment for John 9 on Oct.17). The only way to have sin removed is through the Lord Jesus (v.20). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Isa 59:16-21 is a remarkable passage. The Lord God realised that there was no one in the world who could help His people, but Him. So He sent His Son. “His arm brought salvation”. From a very similar passage in Isa 63:1-6, and from another reading of today’s verses, especially Isa 59:17, it’s possible to read these ideas as being Jesus who saw that there was no other man, and so He (Jesus) put on righteousness as a breastplate. Whichever way we choose to interpret these verses, they are still wonderful. God worked through Jesus. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
|
59:12 In saying ‘We grope for the wall like the blind’ Isaiah is quoting the curse of Deut 28:29 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.17 - believers can also follow this example of putting on the armor of righteousness 1Thess 5:8. V.15,20,21 - we look forward to the light of Christ's return to Zion/Jerusalem to redeem those who repent, both Jew and Gentile, in the millenial age of truth and justice Rom 11:25-27; Isa 60:1,2,3,11,12,14,15,19,20,21. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
When things are going really badly for us it is well worth having a read of this and the previous chapter. Chapter 59 starts with the statement that God isn't handicapped from saving us, neither is He deaf to our requests. The reader is supposed to ask the question "so why isn't my prayer for help being answered?" (58:3). The answer comes in v2 "your iniquities have seperated you from your God; and your sins have hidden His face from you". Sometimes this exact thing will happen to us, just as it did to Israel. We may think that we've got everything right, just as they did (58:2-3), but often we have to admit that we've let our good intentions slip, and we're merely paying God lip-service rather than serving him by loving our neighbour. If this is the case, it is entirely right that God should bring some trauma into our lives in order to alert us to the fact. This is what He did time and again with Israel. Early detection of such an occurence in our lives can save us a lot of heartache. The grass which bends with the wind is not broken by it. Likewise if we bend in the storm and repent of our halfheartedness before God, He will relent just as He promised for Israel (58:8-9). Once we turn to him and confess, trying to get our feet back into the right paths, "then you shall call and the LORD will answer; you shall cry, and He will say, "Here I am". Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
59:9-12 Notice how the prophet associated himself with the people using the words ‘us’, ‘we’ and ‘our’. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
59:2-3 Notice the repeated use of ‘you’ and ‘your’ it is really important to ‘own’ our own responsibilities. It is all too easy, encouraged by the way in which people in positions of importance in the world duck their responsibilities, to try to blame others for our shortcomings or inactivity. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
59:17 The armour that the prophet speaks of can be found on the soldier of Christ – Eph 5:8, 1Thess 5:8 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
PREPARING TO PRAY I had decided that today would be a good day to fast and pray. This was probably motivated more from selfish reasons, as my son was to go into hospital today for a knee opperation and I felt I needed to pray particularly for him. So when I woke up this morning and turned to read Isaiah 59, I was very pleased to read the words: "Surely the arm of the LORD is not too short to save, nor his ear too dull to hear." (Isa 59:1) This was just the encouragement I thought I needed. But then I was brought back to reality as I read the next verse. "But your iniquities have separated you from your God; your sins have hidden his face from you, so that he will not hear." (v.2) It was then that I realised that I needed to spend time getting myself right with God first before any prayers could be really effective. We can't expect God to listen to us if we have chosen to separate ourselves from God and have not made the effort to get right with him again. He is a God of love, but he is also a God of justice who wants his people to be responsive to him. So let's not stay separated from God, but repent and come to him in humility. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
V.5 If someone fosters sin, it will turn around and bite (kill) him/her at some point. V.17 For spiritually protective dress, see Eph 6:14-17. V.18 When Jesus returns, He will judge every man according to his deeds (Rom 2:6); His fiery indignation shall devour His adversaries (Heb 10:27); His enemies in the isles afar off will not escape (Eze 39:6). V.19 Yahweh’s Name shall be known from one end of the earth to the other in the time to come (Isa 45:6; Eze 26:23; Mal 1:11). Vs.20,21 Jesus is the Redeemer of both Natural Israel and Spiritual Israel (Rom 11:26; 1Pet 1:2). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| God's ear had been closed to Israel's prayers because their sins had come between Him and them (v2). Hezekiah realised this was the case because he could see that the curses of Deuteronomy 28 were coming upon the people (see 2Chron 29:5-9 in fulfilment of Deut 28). God in His mercy provided Hezekiah as a mediator to come between God and the people (v16 and 2Chron 29:10) which role was later taken on by Jesus, through whom we can go to that same God in prayer (1Tim 2:5-8). This is an enormous priviledge we should make constant use of. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| Isa 59:7-8;Rom 3:15-17. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
59:14 Truth is the bedrock upon which judgement and justice stand. Often we try to make decisions based upon part knowledge. We may even withhold parts of the truth as we feel that a decision has to be made and all the facts will hinder that decision making. It is fundamental that all the facts are known – the truth – about a matter before decisions are taken if those decisions are to be just. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 4
v. 4
- Let us remember that when Jesus was tempted he turned to the scriptures to answer
his temptations. Remember that we are exhorted many times to do the same. Rom.15:4,
Eph.6:17, John 6:63. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3 v.2 - The phrase 'kingdom of heaven' is unique to Matthew's gospel and is found in the following places [Matthew 3:2 4:17 5:3 10 19 20 7:21 8:11 10:7 11:11 12 19:12 14 23 20:1 13:11 13:24 31 33 44 45 47 52 16:19 18:1 3 4 23 22:2 23:13 25:1 14] We realise that when John came preaching repentance and the kingdom of God he only had the Old Testament and the revelation that he received as a prophet to guide his understanding of what he was preaching about. We might ask 'how much did he understand?' He was able to declare that Jesus was the 'lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world' [John 1:29] But we do know that the prophets, and the angels for that matter, had a limited knowledge of the purpose of God and had a desire to know more. [1 Peter 1:10 - 12] 4
v.3 - 'if
thou be the son of God' as a temptation is seen also at the end of Jesus'
life. [Matthew
4:3 6 27:40] This marks the point that whilst the devil left him for a season
[Luke
4:13] He was continually
being tempted. It might be that we are not told about the continuing stresses
that Jesus was under but we are told about the work that he did that we might
understand that we should not dwell on our own problems but rather concentrate
on the problems of others. 'If' is the recurring word in the temptations. as
if Jesus is questioning his own position with each of the trials.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The way in which Matthew links these two Old Testament passages gives us an insight into how we should relate Isaiah 42 to Psalm 2. 4:8 The 'high mountain' of the temptations contrasts with the 'high mountains' (Revelation 21:2). It was the joy of the kingdom which strengthened Jesus in the temptations. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| THE FRUIT OF
REPENTANCE When the Pharisees and Sadducees came to John to be baptised by him, John had a strong message for them. He said, "You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? Produce fruit in keeping with repentance. And do not think you can say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham. The axe is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire." In their baptisms they declared that they had decided to change their way of life and were now going to turn back to God. But what John told them was to make sure that their decision showed in their actions. It is no use looking at our heritage and thinking that can save us - we must be God's people both in word and in actions. If we say we are going to be God's people but then don't act like it, we end up just like a good looking fruit tree that only has bad fruit. Let us not get caught in the same trap. Stop pretending and produce good fruit. "IF
YOU HAVE REALLY TURNED FROM YOUR SINS TO DO, PRODUCE FRUIT THAT WILL PROVE IT" Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
ch 3 - If we were seeking to advertise something special we would doubtless select a prominent place to stand and speak. Not so John. He was down by Jordan away from centers of population. Why? God is not looking for 'passers by' to accept His call. He is seeking those who will be willing to put some effort into learning about Him. 4:9 Whilst the 'devil' offered Jesus 'all the kingdoms of the world' they were already his for the asking (Psalm 2:8). Likewise we have wonderful things promised to us so let us not be deceived by the apparent benefits of things we might think we can have now. Eve and then Adam made that mistake. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| ch.3 -
Here we find that as soon as John sees the Pharisees, he addresses their worst
fears about the coming King, which is that he will burn up the chaff with
unquenchable fire v
12, a fulfilment of what we saw yesterday. He warns them that the axe is laid
at the tree which does not bear fruit. The fact that the scribes and Pharisees
tried to kill Jesus right from birth, even though they knew and believed the prophecies
regarding him, shows us quite the depth of their wickedness, and quite how much
they feared his power. This sort of wickedness is shown over and over again in
scripture by those who deliberately sought to fight against Gods purpose,
even though they knew and believed the prophecies. We have for example Jezebel
and Athaliah who, knowing of the promise of God to keep a descendant of David
on the throne continually, tried many times over to wipe out all traces of that
kingly seed. How fitting then that we find the men in Jesus time who have
the same mindset, trying to do exactly the same thing to the one who was the final
promised son of David! See 2Kings
11:1-3.
A further point to ponder: Salvation for mankind was not to come through mankind, but through God. God signified this by claiming Jesus as His son in verse 17. John said that the baptism of Christ was different to his, because Christ was the son of God, and he wasnt (John 3:30-31). ch.4 - Why did Jesus go to Galilee of the Gentiles, as soon as he heard that John was in prison? What changed with the passing away of John? Similarly in John 4:1 Jesus departs to Galilee and Samaria once the Pharisees realise he is has more followers than John. Is Jesus signifying that it is now time to go to the gentiles, because Gods stiif necked people have had their chance? Again in verse 24, his fame went throughout Syria. Most of the prophecies of Christ speak of him going to the gentiles. A further point to ponder: What do you think was going through the dizzy, hazy, spinning mind of Jesus after forty days in the wilderness? Stones! How marvelous a proof of the devil being ones own thoughts it is, that all his temptations involve stones, tripping over them, or falling over! Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
3:12 In speaking of the chaff being burnt up John is quoting Mal 4:1 where Malachi says that the stubble represents those that ‘do wickedly’ so the Pharisees would doubtless see the force of John’s point. They were not just passive observers of the baptisms. Their inactivity was actually ‘doing’. It was doing wickedly. How often is our inactivity wickedness? 4:3 ‘If thou be the son of God’ is cast in Jesus’ teeth again (Matt 27:40) – this is how the devil ‘departed from him for a season.’ (Luke 4:13) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The concluding verses of Chapter 3 and the first verses of chapter 4 show an extremely close connection.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
4:2 After being weakened by forty days' fasting Jesus faced temptation. His trial was a great internal struggle pitting the flesh against the spirit. Jesus knew the unlimited power He had at His command (John 3:34). And yet, He resisted His desires in obedience to His Father. He did this in refuting the devil (fleshly desires) by the Word of God. Thus, the last king kept the Yahweh's Word whereas the first king (Saul) did not. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
3:7 The phrase 'wrath to come' is picked up by Paul 1Thess 1:10in a way which shows that repentance and baptism is the way that deliverance is obtained. 4:21 James and John may well have been mending their nets because of the draught of fished of Luke 5:6 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3:9 In warning the Jewish leaders not to lay claim to Abraham John saw the potential which was manifest – John 8:33 - when these same individuals were reasoning with Jesus some time later. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 3:4 John's garment, woven from camel's hair, reminds us somewhat of Elijah's mantle. when we compare this verse with 2Kin 1:8 we can clearly see that there is very little similarity. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
4:11 When we see that ‘angels ministered unto him’ we appreciate that Psa 91:11– quoted by ‘the devil’ was actually true. But it was fulfilled in a different way to the way in which the flesh thought about it. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Some people believe that Jesus faced an external tempter. They believe that this was Satan, a supernatural being (fallen angel), the universal agitator of evil. If Satan exists, he (?) would have been created by Yahweh. Divine angels, by nature, are immortal. Thus, Satan, a supposed fallen divine angel, would be immortal. That would mean that evil would exist forever. But, that is not in Yahweh's plan. The faithful followers of Jesus will live forever in peace (Rev 21:4). But all evil, including death itself will be abolished (Rev 20:10,14). The word Satan, which Bible translators chose to capitalize and personify, is nothing more than the inate human tendency to be oppositional to God's laws - the flesh opposing the Spirit. And so, each person is tempted internally by his/her own desires and not by an external agent. Jesus, being a man and having a human nature, weakened by forty days of fasting, was tempted internally. He overcame each temptation by refuting it with the power of the scripture. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
3:5 In preaching ‘in the wilderness’ - Matt 3:1– john did not make himself easily accessible. Those who wanted to hear his message had to put some effort into the process and go out to hear him. We should not only be willing to listen to the message of the gospel when it is convenient and easy. We should be willing to put ourselves out to hear the message of the gospel. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The Devil And Satan - part 1 of 3 [lesson 12 of 20 from Outline of Basic Bible Teachings by Wes Booker (for part 2 see July 15, Matthew 16)] I. The Devil A. "Devil" is translated from two different Greek words, "daimon" and "diabolos": 1.) Daimon = demon (modern versions) = different kinds of diseases and illnesses in the New Testament 2.) Diabolos = a New Testament word. Literally 'traducer, one who defames or slanders'. Translated "false accuser; slanderer". Comes from two Greek words - "dia" = through, and "ballo" = throw. The idea is one who strikes through with words, i.e. a false accuser or slanderer. "Devil" is NEVER found in the Old Testament, and "devils" is only found four times - each refers to idols. B. Serpent - mentioned in the Old Testament - Gen 3. It was a beast which God made - Gen 1:24-25. It was part of the "very good" creation. According to popular theology, either (1) the devil became a serpent, or (2) the devil entered into and / or controlled the serpent. There are problems with both views. The serpent becomes a symbol for sin in the Bible - Matt 23:33;Matt 3:7. C. Heb 2:14 - important points: 1.) Christ had the same nature as all men; see also Heb 2:17;4:15 2.) If Jesus destroyed the devil through his death, then why is the devil still around tempting people to sin? 3.) Also, how can a supernatural fallen angel devil be "destroyed"? "Destroy" translated abolish, do away, cease, etc. 4.) But if "the devil" = sin nature, then Jesus could destroy it through a perfect life, a sacrificial death, and resurrection to eternal life. 5.) The devil has the power of death. Other verses say that sin has the power of death. Therefore the devil = sin, and is a personification of sin nature - Rom 6:23;8:3;1John 3:8;James 1:14-15;Heb 9:26 D. Devil (diabolos) is also used of Judas Iscariot (John 6:70-71) and of women and men - 1Tim 3:11;2Tim 3:3;Titus 2:3 = slanderer, false accuser E. If the devil is a personification of sin, then why did New Testament writers choose to personify it? Sometimes New Testament writers personified "sin" - Rom 6:6-20. Also other attributes of human nature are personified - wisdom (Prov 8), love (1Cor 13). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
3:7 John's indictment of Israel's leadership echoes the indictment we just read in Isa 59:5. John exclaims that the Pharisees and Sadducees were a generation of vipers. The seed of the woman - those who have chosen to follow God on His terms. The seed of the serpent - those who have chosen to follow their own fleshly desires. The Pharisees and Sadducees were supposed to be the knowledgeable, religious leaders of the Jews. And yet they were in error from both the true understanding of God's plan and in correct conduct. The lesson for us is that if we desire to serve God, then we must make sure of what He wants. This can only be obtained by reading His Word, the Bible. We must not give credence to those who claim to be religious authorities until we have checked out what they say against the Bible (See Acts 17:10,11). 4:4,7,10 Jesus countered His temptations by reflecting on God’s Word. This is the most powerful instrument for overcoming the flesh (Heb 4:12). 4:11 When Jesus’ temptation was over, angels ministered to him. Those angels are available to the true followers of Jesus also (Heb 1:14). 4:23 When Jesus preached, His message always concerned the gospel of the kingdom. And yet, the kingdom is the very fact that Christendom denies. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
4:23 The religious leaders and seat of religion in Israel was to be found in Jerusalem. So Jesus went about Galilee preaching. His message was for the people who saw a need rather than those who thought that they did not have any need for salvation. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||