|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.8
- We have language here which mirrors that of the time recorded in Gen.47:29
when Jacob called Joseph to him to ask him not to bury him in Egypt. The phrase
'deal
kindly [and truly] with ..." seems to be reserved for just these special
type of occasions: Gen.24:49,
Josh.2:14, Ruth 1:8. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.6
- There were three times in the year when all the males had to go and present
themselves before Yahweh. [Deuteronomy
16:16] There are only
three times in the whole of Scripture where 'yearly sacrifice' occurs. [1Samuel
1:21 2:19 20:6] We
must conclude that it is one of the three main feasts. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.2
- Jonathan speaks with insight here when he says 'God forbid, thou shalt not die'.
If nothing else he knew that David had been anointed to be king but had not yet
taken up that office. We see a number of occasions in Jonathan's life that show
him to be a man of faith. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 20:1
The way in which David asks Jonathan why his father is seeking to kill him indicates
that even though David told Samuel all that Saul had done unto him (1
Samuel 19:18) Samuel had been unable to satisfy David's questioning. We should
realise that our Spiritual mentors do not have all the answers. Samuel certainly
did not. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| chs 19 and 20
- UNDIVIDED LOYALTY Jonathan was in a tough position. He loved David with all his heart, yet he also loved and respected his father, King Saul. But Saul and David were enemies. Whose side should Jonathan take? If he took David's side he would either have to flee with David or Saul would kill him. If he too Saul's side he would be forced to give David up and break the oath of friendship they had sworn. There are times when we find ourselves in similar positions where two of our best friends become enemies and both use us as the sounding board. What do we do? Jonathan did not side with either. He was loyal to the end to both Saul and David. How did he do it? Jonathan's principles and foundations were pure. His life did not resolve around people - either David or Saul, but on the principle of doing the right thing. His job as the crown prince was to be loyal to king Saul - and he stayed loyal. He stuck with Saul right to the bitter end. He also loved David right to the end, stood up for him and remained faithful. Jonathan remained true to his principles and it is that that got him through. When we are in the same situation we must pray for strength to remain true to our principles and ask God to open our eyes to the right way and let him direct our paths. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| David is becoming
more and more estranged from all those he loves and trusts. He has fled from home.
Samuel could not answer his questions and now Jonathan does not seem to appreciate
Saul' murderous intent. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| THE MARKS OF
FRIENDSHIP One of the most beautiful friendships in the Bible is that between Jonathan and David. There are three things in this chapter that show this friendship so special. David needed to know how Saul, Jonathan's father, really felt about him. Did Saul want to kill David, or not? As David explained the situation to Jonathan, Jonathan showed the response of a true friend for whom nothing would be too difficult. He said, "Whatever you want me to do, I'll do for you." It was an attitude of self sacrifice, love and humble service. Another mark of the friendship between Jonathan and David was in their covenant of friendship. Both Jonathan and David made promises to each other that they would be friends for ever, whether separated or together. The third binding fact that held both Jonathan and David together was their love for the LORD. Both were dedicated to the LORD, and loved and trusted him with all their hearts. The LORD was the witness to their friendship. May we show the qualities of true friendship in our lives, loving others as ourselves, serving one another in love, and in unity with the LORD. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 20:25 In saying Saul sat 'by the wall' we are being presented with detail which may seem irrelevant to the narrative. But consider this. Saul has been told that he will lose the throne and he is paranoid that David will take his position. So Saul sits with his back to the wall lest anyone could come up behind him and kill him - so little did he understand David. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.27 " where cometh not the son of Jesse" The question was asked, as it were, casually, and with as great an air of indifference as he could assume. Jonathan having replied that David had asked and obtained his permission to attend a family anniversary at Bethlehem,( V.6) the pent-up passions of the king burst out in a most violent storm of rage against his son. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| David was indeed blessed. He had Samuel (as we noted yesterday), and he had Jonathan. True friends understand each other. When they parted they bound themselves under an oath of friendship, wherever they might be. Their last meeting is recorded in 1Sam 23:16, where Jonathan "strengthened David's hand in God." David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
V.5 A celebration had been instituted every month, at the time of the new moon (Num 28:11-15). Trumpets were blown to herald this feast (Num 10:10; Psa 81:3). V.6 At the time of this new moon festival David excused himself, through Jonathan, on the pretext that his family was holding an annual feast at Bethlehem. He, obviously, wanted to avoid contact with an enraged Saul. V.24 The annual family feast excuse was a lie as David was in the field at the new moon and not in Bethlehem. V.42 And after he said his farewell to Jonathan, David went to Nob, not to Bethlehem (1Sam 21:1). Is this an example of an acceptable lie - in this case for the preservation of life? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
Jonathan's faith in God was unshakeable. Jonathan's earthly calling was to be the next king after Saul. Saul reminded him of this in 1Sam 20:31. Jonathan, however, had no intention of establishing his own throne, knowing that the purpose of God was with David (v15). It took great faith to resist that temptation, especially since he was rather better suited to the role than his father was. Jonathan's faith caused him to look into the future where he knew David would be crowned king. At this moment in time David was about to go into exile, and his future looked very bleak indeed. Jonathan had the faith to see that God would establish David no matter what, and that it was in fact God's will that David should go away (v22). This type of faith can be very helpful to us if we can develop it. It is virtually the same as looking into the future. We know that God's purpose is with a heavenly kingdom and not an earthly one. Therefore, we know that we will never be truly established in our present state. We ought to mull this over, like Jonathan did, and allow the clear vision it gives us to stop us clinging onto vain hopes of earthly glories. Our kingdom will come soon enough, along with Jonathan's, when we sit together with the LORD's anointed on his throne, and reign together with him. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
20:30 Saul would have been more accurate if he had described Jonathan as the son of a perverse and rebellious father! Saul, seemingly, did not see his problems. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
20:8 Notice the covenant that David and Jonathan made which is recorded in 1Sam 18:3 – was made before God. It was not simply an agreement between two friends. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| MUD SLINGING There comes a time for every one of us when we are involved in an arguement or dispute of some sort. I find it interesting listening to debates of the people around me. Often it seems one person is able to stick to the topic of the discussion and to debate it in a logical and not so heated way. But when the other debating party realises that they will not get anywhere by logic and reason, their side of the arguement can often turn to mud slinging, finger pointing and character slander, attempting to knock the other down in order to make themselves look good. When Saul wanted to kill David (for no good reason), he could not stand against the questions and reasoning that Jonathan put to him. So instead of humbly apologising and changing the way he thought, Saul turned dirty. He got angry. He shouted at Jonathan "You are the son of a perverse and rebellious woman!" Then he said, "Don't I know that you have sided with the son of Jesse to your own shame and to the shame of the mother who bore you?" (1Sam 20:30) Saul ended up flinging his spear at Jonathan to kill him. People like Saul are easy to observe and also easy to imitate. When we find ourselves in an arguement, let's collect ourselves, our emotions, and our thoughts. Then we should humbly accept that what we say may need more thought. Let's not stoop so low that we end up slinging mud at someone else. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| David was aware that there was no safety being with Samuel. Samuel's influence over Saul would only last for a limited amount of time. Even though David realized that God was with him, and had promised him the throne, but he also knew that he must not presume on this, but use every available right means for his safety. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.30 The enraged Saul had cursed out Jonathan for his love of David. Saul's language is ironic in crudely bringing Jonathan's mother Ahinoam into the rant (1Sam 14:50). David also married an Ahinoam (1Sam 25:43). Ahinoam means my brother is gracious - a description that would be appropriate for the passion that David and Jonathan had for each other. V.42 The close bond between David and Jonathan is evident from the record. Their covenant in perpetuity capped this special relationship. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
20:4 Jonathan’s commitment to David is seen in his promise – an open ended commitment to David. Do we ever feel this way outward our brethren and sisters? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
20:3 Despite Jonathan’s words to David we see David a man troubled and uncertain about what is going to happen and sensing a trap in the words of Jonathan. So we see David becoming more distanced from his family and friends. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
20:2 One might imagine that Saul was willing to tell Jonathan his plans about David despite his knowledge of Jonathan’s delight in David because Jonathan, being the next in line for the throne, might have changed his mind about David. Saul clearly did not know his son! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 1Sam 19:11 - Like Christ, David was watched for an opportunity to kill him. His bride's name, Michal (4324) means "who is like God" and those married to the beloved are to emulate Christ who manifests God. 1Sam 20:28 - Bethlehem mentioned for both David and Christ. 1Sam 20:30 - there were false accusers of Mary too. 1Sam 19:12 - The beloved (let down from a room) not unlike Christ who was in an upper room. 1Sam 19:24 - we have the king with his clothes stripped off not unlike Christ at the crucifixion. 1Sam 19:20,21,23 - we have prophesying and even the king prophesying not unlike the prophecies of and by Christ. 1Sam 20:2-3 - we have mention of the father not doing anything without telling first which is like our heavenly Father not doing anything without first revealing it to the prophets; we have the beloved being told he won't die though David noted he was a step from death not unlike Christ who was dealt a wound to the heel not head and didn't have his body corrupted. 1Sam 20:31 - in fear of David Saul says, "he must die" somewhat echos the cries of "crucify him". 1Sam 20:6,29 - we have mention of a sacrifice made for all his family. 1Sam 20:16 - a covenant was made that the beloved's friend [Jonathan (3083) means "God has given" (perhaps echoing those God has given to Christ to be in his kingdom)], who loved the beloved as himself, would not be cut off from the house of the beloved and that the enemies of the beloved would receive God's vengeance (echo of judgment day?). 1Sam 20:19 - the beloved was stayed three days and then mention of being hid by the stone "Ezel" (237) which means departure and was a memorial stone between Ramah (7414) which means hill and "Nob" (5011) which means "high place" echoing perhaps how Christ was hid by a stone and departed from it to a high place. 1Sam 20:20-22 - one of many mentions of three involved the arrows [(2671) derived from (2686) which can mean to pierce or chop into] which were likely in part wood and the message was the Lord had sent the beloved away not unlike Christ who was pierced on the wooden cross obedient to the Lord's will and sent away.1Sam 20:26 - the mention of the beloved being thought unclean perhaps echos the mortal flesh of Christ tempted to sin (Heb 4:15). 1Sam 20:27 - we remember Christ at the memorial table awaiting his return and he won't eat or drink till he returns. 1Sam 20:32 - it was asked what Christ had done to deserve death also. 1Sam 20:34-35,41-42 - on the morning after the second day of the month (i.e. the third day) there were three people present not unlike the three at Golgotha; the beloved arose (NIV indicates from the stone) and departed but the covenant between their seeds was binding forever (Gal 3:29). 1Sam 20:39 - perhaps the boy represents those who don't understand the Gospel message like the thief on the cross who was not converted. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.
1,2
- The suggestion here is that God himself might be revealed as he was at Sinai
in Exo.19-20, so that, as the people then were terrified, so the ungodly might
be. This will be fulfilled in the return of Jesus to the earth. Will there be
this heat that causes the earth to flow at that time. Peter says so [2Pet.3:10],
and goes on to make the point that the heat will indeed purge the earth of wickedness,
hence the question he goes on to ask in v.11,12. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.4
- Whereas man has sought to know what Yahweh planned as the solution to the consequences
of Adams transgression we have been shown. [1
Corinthians 2:8-9]
What a wonderful privilege. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.4
- Some of what God has in store for us is beyond our comprehension - and it all
is if we cannot develop the eye of faith with which to see it, but through the
Spirit much is revealed - 1Cor.2:9,10 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 64:1
Is this our prayer? Or are we happy with the way things are in our lives and so
would rather delay the day of the coming of the Lord? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :6
That man will 'fade as a leaf' returns to a theme Isaiah has already spoken of
(40:6) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 64:8 The willingness of Israel to respond to the potter contrasts markedly with how they were not responding ( 45:9) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.8 The clay is clay. If it ever becomes anything of worth, it is by virtue of the Potter, not of the clay. It is only when this fact is acknowledged that the clay finds itself upgraded into ceramic. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.10 we are told in Isa 52:1 that Jerusalem is "the holy city" What does the plural "holy cities" then mean? Is it saying that all Judea was holy to God? or are Zion and Jerusalem (the one city) the answer to "the holy cities"? John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.6 If we ever become puffed up with pride we would do well to reflect on this verse. This is our true position in the sight of Yahweh. We must humble ourselves, and only then will Yahweh elevate us from our lowly position (1Pet 5:6). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| There’s a very interesting comment in 1Cor 2:9,10 about today’s chapter.Isa 63:4 states that people haven’t heard or seen the wonders which God has prepared for us in the Kingdom. But Paul’s comment on this is that “God hath revealed them unto us by His Spirit.” How much therefore we do need both the Old and the New Testaments, together! David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
64:1 rend the heavens’ - Acts 10:11 :5 Worketh righteousness Acts 10:35 Shows that Isaiah is speaking of the call of the gentiles in this chapter. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
64:5 The working of righteousness is seen – Acts 10:35 – in the preaching of the apostles. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.6 Sometimes we might become self-satisfied in our walk, thinking that we are doing o.k. Yahweh reminds us that, in His sight: all our righteous acts are like filthy rags. Unpalatable as it might seem, filthy rags is a reference to material soiled by menstruation (see Lev 15:19-27). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
64:4 Of course man cannot know what God has in store unless He reveals it. – Ecc 3:11 but so often we try to use our own reasoning to anticipate world events. It is only through the details of Scripture, properly reviewed, that we can have any idea about His purpose in the world. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
64:5 Working righteousness is ‘doing the word’ – James 1:22. Not simply reading it but putting its teaching into practice in our daily lives. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 In this verse, there is an allusion to Mt. Sinai (Exo 19:18; Judg 5:5; Psa 144:5). V.10 Jerusalem will one day be the capital of the world. Then, she shall be adorned with beauty (Isa 52:1). V.11 In the Kingdom, a new temple will be built to allow the mortal population to worship Yahweh (See Eze 41). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
At the time of Isaiah (see 1:1) the temple had not been laid waste or burned with fire (v11). So this prophecy could be entirely future. But if we look closely, it possibly has its basis in the desecrations of Ahaz in 2ki16. There he erected an Assyrian altar (2Kin 16:11-16) and cut up or removed parts of the temple used for the offerings (2Kin 16:17-18). He used this new altar to replace burned offerings (2Kin 16:15). And by the time of Hezekiah, his son, the temple had been closed up, was filled with rubbish, and offerings had ceased completely (2Chron 29:3,5,7). So in effect God had ceased to be worshipped at all, hence in v5-7 their sins weren't being taken away by the daily sin offerings. But even though the days of Ahaz's antagonism were over, the awful truth revealed in v7 is that the people couldn't be bothered to re-establish the correct offerings and continual burning of the lamp before God. The ESV is "rouses himself" and AV/NKJV "stirs himself up". So how about us? Do we have the energy to rouse ourselves from slumber to approach God in prayer to ask for forgiveness daily? Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
64:4 This verse is quoted in 1Cor 2:9 to speak of God’s work in Christ. Paul continues by telling us that the things Isaiah speaks of have been revealed to us. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.2
- It is quite clear from this and many other scriptures that healing is available
only to those who have faith. This must be true of spiritual healing too. We cannot
expect grace at all, but we know we will not be granted it without faith. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.6
- The man sick of the palsy who has his sins forgiven is found in [Matthew
9:6 Mark 2:7 10 Luke 5:21 24] There is only one other occasion in the gospels
where Jesus forgives sins. [Luke
7:48] First we must
realise that Jesus' mission was to reconcile man to God. It is our sins and not
our sickness that separates us from Him. Therefore if Jesus was not able to provide
the forgiveness of sins then his mission would be of no lasting benefit. [Isaiah
61:1] Predicts the
work of Jesus [Luke
4:18.] Notice that
he is to bring 'the
opening of the prison' - this is reconciliation to God through the forgiveness
of sins. That his work could achieve this had to be seen in his ministry. Therefore
he, on the occasion of the man sick of the palsy, forgives sins. The animosity
of the leaders at this shows that they did not understand the work of Jesus. They
are correct, of course. Only God can forgive sins. However Jesus says [John
5:36] Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 9:1
Jesus' 'own city' is Capernaum - see Mark
2:3 - indicating that by this time Jesus had relocated from Nazareth to Capernaum. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :2
In saying 'thy sins be forgiven thee' Jesus is taking upon himself the responsibility
of God (Isaiah
43:25) as the leaders said, however this is why he did it - to confirm his
position, not to usurp God's authority. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| In verses
2, 22, and 29, Jesus calls our attention to the fact that people were healed
in accordance with their faith. The first instance is interesting because it was
the faith of the friends, rather than the sick man himself, that allowed him to
be healed. Does this apply to us today? James 5 seems to suggest that this is
in fact the case: "and the prayer of faith will save the sick". It is
noticeable that prayer was the agent through which the elders would heal, and
not the holy spirit gift of healing. It would seem, then, that we have immense
capacity to effect the healing of our brothers and sisters through prayers of
faith. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| 9:11,14 Notice the contrast. When the Pharisees wanted to fault Jesus they came to his disciples. When John’s disciples wanted to know about Jesus they went directly to him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Matt 9:9 The simple words FOLLOW ME akoloutheo 190 "be in the same way with" This was the calling that Christ made. Matthew accepted the call, as others did. Matt 4:18-22. Others were not prepared to pay the price. I.E. The rich man. Mark 10:21-22. The call to-day is still the same, and like it was then, a few accept, but the majority decline. (How short sighted they are.) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
- Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
9:2,22 Like we saw in January, there is a link between the man sick of the palsy and the woman with the issue of blood. Jesus told them both to be encouraged. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.9 "Receipt of custom" Matthew, being a tax collector, would have been in the toll house or booth. At this time being by the seaside, Matthew was likely collecting a ferry tax for the transit of people and goods across the lake. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
9:10 They are in Matthew’s house – Mark 15, Luke 5:29 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.20 The woman knew that she would be committing a sin if she touched Jesus (Lev 15:19-27). However, she did touch Him and she was healed (Matt 18:17; 2Cor 5:21). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
V.9 Matthew was called by Jesus. Connecting some dots, we see that Matthew was also named Levi (Mark 2:14; Luke 5:27). Being the son of Alphaeus probably connects him to the apostle James as a brother or half-brother (Matt 10:3; Mark 3:18; Luke 6:15; Acts 1:13). Matthew's job was to collect transport taxes. He would sit in his place (a toll booth would be the modern equivalent) and exact taxes from locals taking their goods to market and from caravans hauling their wares to distant markets. Highways were comparatively few at this time and could easily be monitored by tax collectors. Matthew would have a keen understanding of the value of goods of all kinds, weight, and monetary exchange rates. He would be competent in several languages. He would collect these taxes for his Roman overlords and keep a percentage for himself. These publicans (an older term for tax collectors) were hated by the Jews for two reasons: firstly, they worked for the occupying Romans; and secondly, tax collectors had the reputation of becoming wealthy by overestimating the value of goods to boost their commissions. Another notable tax collector, in the Bible, is Zacchaeus (Luke 19:2). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
9:13 Here Jesus advises the Pharisees to go and read Hos 6:6. Later – Matt 12:7– he observes that they did not understand what it means, indicating that they had not gone and read it with understanding. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
9:8 Whilst Jesus’ critics did not see beyond the things that Jesus said and did the multitude did, recognising that Jesus’ actions were ‘of God’. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.2 Palsy (KJV) is a word which is contracted from paralysis. Paralysis cane be described as: the loss of sensation, or the power of motion, or both, in any part of the body. Vs.16,17 The New Covenant cannot operate with the Old Covenant. Later, Judaizers would try to force members of the early ecclesia to be circumcised and to obey the Law of Moses. Vs.29,30 Compare Jesus’ different treatments to the blind. Some He did not touch. Others, Jesus touched in different ways (Mark 8:23-25; 10:51,52). V.34 See Matt 12:24. The Pharisees assigned the power of God to Beelzebub. Beelzebub literally means Lord of the Flies. Flies gather where there is garbage and human waste. No contrast, between Yahweh and effluence, could have been greater. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
9:18 It was the ‘rulers’ who were opposed to Jesus but here we see one seeking Jesus’ help. Doubtless all the rulers recognised that Jesus was doing God’s work. Most of them chose to ignore what they knew. This man had a personal need and so that over rode any prejudice against Jesus that he might have had. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Why do you think Matthew, the sinner, is all of a sudden introduced in this chapter about healing? Could it be that the writer wishes us to see that the healings were only a prelude to the real purpose of Jesus - to forgive sins? This seems likely, because in v5-6 Jesus states clearly that the miracles were there to prove he could forgive. Forgiveness is an invisible attribute. We have to take it on faith. So Jesus was saying: "if you need demonstration that I have the power to forgive (or heal) sins, you can see it in the fact that I have the power to heal physical problems. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
||||||||||