|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.30
(following on from v.25)
demonstrates how that throughout this chapter which covers some considerable time,
there was nothing to report except the ever increasing corruption of the ways
of the people because of the examples set by their kings. It is into this all
time low of Israel's existence that God sends Elijah. It seems that the work of
a prophet was never easy. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.4
- This is exactly the same curse as that given to Jeroboam in ch.14:11,
and of Ahab in 21:24,
and it also represents the fate of Jezebel, predicted in 21:23,
2Kings 9:10. To be eaten by dogs is a fate of those too poor to arrange a
burial or those without friends or relatives to do it, so quite a serious dishonour
to a person of power. Here is God's demonstration that He is in control. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Ahab is presented
as the worst king up to this point. In searching through the historical record
we find no mention of Baal worship from the time when Gideon threw down the altar
of Baal (Judges
6:25-28) and the reign of Ahab. So his reign brought in a terrible retrograde
move. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :12
We should not assume that Zimri acted because he wanted to fulfil the word
of God to Jehu. Rather God, knowing the end from the beginning, knew the man and
how things would work out. Zimri fulfilled his own evil will and in so doing fulfilled
the words of the Lord to Jehu. That does not justify Zimri's actions. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 16:2 We may think of the northern kingdom as being simply a rebellion against the house of David. However it was 'of God' We see a similar comment (2Kin 14:7) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.25 Was worse because he was the first to strengthen his position with foreign alliances. Up till his day Israel had kept aloof from her neighbours, but Omri sought an alliance with his powerful neighbour Tyre, and cemented such an alliance by the marriage of his son, Ahab, with the Tyrian princess Jezebel. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| "So Tibni died, and Omri reigned." (1Kin 16:22). This short sentence tells us that even in a wicked country like the northern part of Israel, you can't have two kings reigning. There's a useful lesson for us, here. We cannot serve two masters, and "A double minded man is unstable in all his ways." (James 1:8). David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
V.1 This Jehu is not to be confused with the Jehu of 1Kin 19:16,17. This Jehu was a prophet sent against Baasha; the other one was Yahweh's revenger on the house of Ahab. V.4 However, there are some similarities surrounding the time of both men. It was forecast that both Baasha and Jezebel would suffer the same kind of death (2Kin 9:35-37). Vs.9,10,12 It is interesting that as Jehu confronted Jezebel, she cited the example of Zimri the usurper (2Kin 9:31). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
V.8 When we compare this verse with 1Kin 15:33, we see that Baasha reigned for a total of twenty three years. Elah, his son must have reigned for less than two years, even though it says that he was king for two years, when we put this with V.10 we can soon see that it was just short of two years. He came to the throne during the 26th year of Asa, and was killed during the 27th year of Asa's reign. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.34 After the destruction of Jericho, Joshua made a curse on anyone who would re-build the city (Josh 7:26). In Ahab's time, Hiel re-built Jericho and lost two sons according to Joshua's curse. Men of Yahweh who made blessings and curses had them honored by Yahweh. We, as people of Yahweh in Christ, are asked not to pronounce doom on anyone (Rom 11:14). Rather we are to follow the example of the Lord Jesus and not rail against injustice (Isa 42:3;53:7; Matt 5:39). Judgement will come later by the hand of Yahweh (Rom 12:19). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:6 A repeated word used to speak of the death of the king is that he ‘slept’ thus demonstrating that resurrection was an integral part of the teaching in Old Testament times. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Zimri's reign lasted but seven days (V15) but, in those seven days he was able to succeed in executing the judgement pronounced by the prophet Jehu against the house of Baasha (V.2-3) in wiping out the whole house of Baasha. (V.12) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
16:15 Israel, I the north, was evil, ruled by evil kings. This evil was compounded by instability. Zimri reigned only one week. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.17,18 Tirzah had been the capital city of the Northern Kingdom since Jeroboam. Omri attacked Tirzah and, with the help of Zimri, it was destroyed. V.24 After the destruction of Tirzah, Samaria became the new capital of Israel. Samaria remained the capital of Israel until Assyria laid siege to it in 723 BC, which lasted for three years. After that, many of Israel's tribes were removed by the Assyrians and sent into captivity. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:30-33 There probably is not a greater or more extensive condemnation of any king of Israel or Judah than this one of Ahab seen here. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.16 Sometimes the people's names, in the Bible, do not match their characters. For example, Zimri means praiseworthy, while Omri means servant of Yahweh. On the other hand, Jehu fits because it means Yahweh is He (v.1). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:8 In giving a year in the reign of Asa when Elah began to reign we are given a point of reference when we seek to sort out the relationship between the reigns of the kings of Judah and Israel. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.3,4 Baasha replaced Jeroboam for his sins. But, Baasha sinned just like Jeroboam, and, therefore, he would be punished just like Jeroboam (1Kin 14:11). Vs.9,10 Jezebel compares Jehu, Yahweh’s avenger of the house of Ahab, to Zimri (2Kin 9:21). Jehu, the son of Hanani, declared Yahweh's punishment against Baasha via the hand of Zimri (v.16). Jehu, the son of Nimshi, was the instrument of Yahweh’s punishment against the house of Ahab (2Kin 9:7). The house of Ahab would suffer the same fate as the houses of Jeroboam and Baasha (2Kin 9:9). Anyone from the house of Baasha, like that of Jeroboam, who lived in the city, would be eaten by dogs (v.4; 1Kin 14:11). Of the household of Ahab, Jezebel, who lived in the city (Jezreel), would suffer the same fate (2Kin 9:10,35,36). V.29 And so began Ahab’s 22-year reign, from 919 to 897 BC. He had flashes of obedience to Yahweh, but was highly influenced by his ambitious Zidonian princess. Ahab did not learn by Solomon’s experience of taking strange wives, which turned him from worshipping Yahweh (1Kin 11:1). Notice that one of those strange women was a Zidonian, like Jezebel. Likewise, scripture tells us that marrying a spouse who is not in the Truth can be disastrous to one’s spiritual health, and exhorts us not to do it (Prov 22:14,33; 2Cor 6:14). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
There are several statements in this chapter which show that God works behind the scenes in our lives. Baasha's ascension to the throne in 1Kin 16:2 seems obviously God's work because God speaks directly to Baasha by a prophet. Yet at the time Baasha may have had no idea he was being influenced by God (15:27-30). Also the events in v18-19 appear on the surface to be entirely Zimri's own actions, until we read that they happened "because of the sins which he had committed". So the Bible means us to see that God was at work in these events, conspiring for them to end in Zimri's destruction. Although this chapter is mostly negative, we can still gain instruction on how God works through these examples in our own lives for good. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
16:34 The injunction about rebuilding Bethel was given by Joshua in Josh 6:26. So Hiel’s actions were in direct rebellion against the words of God thought Joshua. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 1Kin 16:31 - "Jezebel" (348) according to Strong's means "chaste" but according to Brown-Driver-Briggs means "unchaste, Baal exalts, Baal is husband to". Jezebel's father "Ethbaal" (856) means "with Baal". Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.7
I suppose we tend to assume that the word of the Lord came instantly. This is
not the case, and this is clearly not an isolated incident of the patient waiting
required for God to give His answer. It is presented as a general principle and
a requirement of the believer -
Psalm 27:14 Isa.28:16 Hab.2:3 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.3
- This should be our constant desire. This maybe picks up the advice of ch.6:3? Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 42:2
One wonders why the people felt the need for Jeremiah to pray for them. Could
they not pray themselves or did they think that the prayer of a prophet was more
effective than a prayer offered by a common person. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :18
Even though the people want Jeremiah to pray for them - as if they had repented
- they were still to suffer the judgement of Deuteronomy
28:37 'astonishment' - this indicates that the desire for Jeremiah to pray
for them was not a mark of true repentance. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 42:2 Continuing the them of Jeremiah praying for the people. He had been told three time (Jer 7:16, 11:14, 14:1) not to pray for the people already so it is clear that he had been in the habit of praying for the people. However was there any point in praying for a people who did not want to obey God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.7 The delay must have severely tested the faith of the Jews. As each day went by they would have become more and more filled with fear lest the Babyonians swoop down upon them. They had not learned the lesson that Moses had tried to teach the nation when he led them from Egypt, when God declared " Stand still and see the Salvation of Yahweh" as day followed day, they became more and more impatient with the still, silent prophet, who trmained apart from the people, awaiting the answer of God. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
In this chapter, all the people come to Jeremiah and ask him to pray for guidance (v2). They declare how they are willing to take any answer, and do exactly what God requires of them (5-6). It sounds very similar to our prayers, doesn't it? The ones we pray when we need or want something. I dare say that our motives are often the same as these people too. They wanted to go to Egypt, and only Egypt. They wanted to feel safe. They wanted to be well fed (v14). Nothing wrong with that surely? So why ask God then? If there was nothing wrong with going to Egypt, why did they pray to God for guidance, rather than just going? Surely if something's right then you just do it! They knew that it was wrong to go to Egypt. They knew God had said "you will never go back there" (Deut 17:16). They were doing the thing that young children do, asking a second or tird time just in case the answer would be different "this time". How often are our prayers for guidance just thinly diguised demands for what we want? How often do our prayers come from our deceitful heart, trying to feel justified in going a way we know to be wrong? Sometimes we ought to look into the word of God for our answers, rather than spending too much time in wordy requests for guidance. Prayers can make us feel very pious, but we can find ourselves justifying just about anything by claiming "I made the decision prayerfully" or "It must be God's will". David said "thy word is a light to my path". It is to the word that we should go for our guidance. It is here that God has already written an answer to our every prayer. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
Vs.2,3 Prayer is an integral part of a relationship with Yahweh (Rom 12:12; Phil 4:6;1Thess 5:17;1Tim 2:8; James 5:16). However, prayer is of none effect if hearts are not genuine, as Yahweh reads the innermost thoughts of man (1Sam 16:7; Matt 6:8). Here, the remnant of Judah asked Jeremiah to pray to Yahweh for guidance for them. But it was obvious that their hearts were not true (vs.20,21). They had already made up their minds before asking for guidance, and were really seeking approval. Thus, what Jeremiah said on another occasion rings true (Jer 17:9). We are encouraged to pray to Yahweh often (1Thess 5:17). But, must never attempt to use Yahweh as a rubber stamp. If we are genuine, we will leave all results to His will. Jesus was prepared to do this, in His most anxious hour, and so should we (Matt 26:42). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| TEN DAYS LATER Sometimes praying to God is like having a one-way conversation. We talk, we pray, we ask, but never seem to hear back. At those times we may begin to wonder whether God is really listening. Why can't it be like the old days when God answered straight away through his prophets, and people knew they would get an answer? Jeremiah was one such prophet. When he prayed, God answered. Jeremiah was the voice that made speaking to God a two way conversation. So the people asked Jeremiah to pray to the LORD for them. They said, "Pray that the LORD your God will tell us where we should go and what we should do." (Jer 42:3) So Jeremiah agreed and prayed to the LORD. Then the record continues by saying, "Ten days later the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah." (v.7) No, it was not always straight away. In this case it took ten days before the LORD answered Jeremiah's prayer. At other times and with people like Elijah, Daniel and Peter, the answers came even as they were praying. But sometimes answers take time. Let's be sure that we wait patiently for God's reply without giving up and doing our own thing. We can always be sure God has heard and that he will answer in his own good time. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| The remnant of Judah asked God, through Jeremiah, to counsel them. “We will do whatever God tells us to,” they said. Poor Jeremiah! He boldly relayed God’s words to them, all the words recorded in Jer 42:9-22. He probably guessed what the people would say and do, but still he faithfully spoke God’s words. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
42:2 Remember we have already read that Jeremiah had been told not to pray for the people Jer 7:16, 11:14, 14:11 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
42:3 Notice how the people are distanced, in their own mind, from God calling the ‘the Lord thy God’. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
42:19-22‘go not to Egypt’ had been the warning of the prophet – Isa 31:1 – the people had asked Jeremiah to pray for them and now they are not willing to listen to the answer! How often are we like this? We are happy to do what God wants of us when it matches our own desires. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.7 Yahweh could have answered Jeremiah right away if He wanted to do so. But, Yahweh often tests the faith and patience of His children. We should be aware of these things in our lives: Rest in the LORD, and wait patiently for him (Psa 37:7). V.21 We are encouraged to pray (Phil 4:6). And we should have the confidence that we shall receive an answer (James 1:6-8). However, that answer might not be the one expected or desired by us. But, if we are faithful, we shall accept it because Our Heavenly Father knows what is best for us. If we seek eternal life, and a place in the kingdom, then Yahweh will guide us to those goals, but only if we listen to Him (Luke 11:32). The remnant of Judah wanted salvation. Yahweh showed them the way to salvation. However, they refused His guidance because it was not what they wanted to hear. Let us not make the same mistake in our dealings with Yahweh as Judah. If we do, we will not end up with eternal life or a place in the Kingdom Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
42:4-7 Notice how Jeremiah tries to get those to whom he is speaking to recognise God as ‘their God’ and not just the God of Jeremiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| :9,
12, 14 present a threefold 'appeared' 'that in the mouth of two or three witnesses
' [Deuteronomy
19:15]. This powerful testimony to the resurrection of Jesus is developed
[1
Corinthians 15:3-8]. We should not underestimate the power of these eye witness
accounts. The fact that we are now 2,000 years on from the event does not make
the testimony of eyewitnesses any less credible.
:15 In commanding the disciples to preach to 'every creature' we have the origins of the language [Colossians 1:23] where Paul informs us that the words of Jesus actually have been fulfilled. So, without wishing to say that we no longer need to preach, the work has been done. It is not as if our preaching if doing a work that the apostles did not do. They completed the job in their day and we are repeating the work, as far as we area able without the Spirit gifts. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Mark seems to
go out of the way to emphasise in a small space that the risen Jesus 'appeared'
(:9,
12, 14) that in the mouth of three witnesses ... (Deuteronomy
19:15) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| The mourning of
the disciples in
v10 shows us that all the way through the teaching of Jesus, they hadn't understood
his real message. They hadn't understood that he was going to die, and be raised
again, to save them from their sins. They had taken his ministry as being an extension
of the teaching of the law and the prophets, and as being an earthly ministry.
At his death a very necessary thing had happened. They had all sworn they would not forsake him, yet they all had. They were all condemned men and women. All their enthusiasm for the law, and their illusions of greatness during his rule, had been shattered. Their mourning for him was a mourning also for the cause that they had believed in so fervently, which was now lost to them. What was worse, they hadn't even stood up and fought for it. Yet, these were now men and women who Christ could work with. They were humbled and destitute. His reapearance to them effected a magnificent change in them. They were as it were "re-born", having been through a great trial of faith. They had failed that trial, and were now ready to accept the saving name of Christ, and his forgiveness. This was the gospel that Jesus now asked them to preach Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
|
16:19 In saying that Jesus 'sat on the right hand of God' Mark is highlighting the fulfillment of Psa 110:1 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.17-18 As we read through the Acts we see these promises fulfilled. Power to expel demons. Acts 5:19 Ability to speak in new tongues. Acts 2 Ability to pick up serpents, that is (implied), to pick up venomous snakes without being physically harmed. Acts 28:3 The power to place hands on the sick, who will then recover. Acts 3:6 There is no record of any one drinking a deadly drink without being hurt; but you will note with this promise, the word "if" is used. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
V.7 It is interesting that Mark states disciples and Peter ( cf. Matt 28:7). After the Lord's promise, Peter was to deny him (Matt 26:32-35). Perhaps, the angel distinguished Peter in v.7 as a reflection of this.Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Vs.1,3 The women came to the sepulchre to anoint the body of the Lord. But they wondered who would roll the stone away from the entrance for them. The stone was large, flat, round, and heavy. It ran on a track which had bumps on the ends of the opening to secure the stone from rolling away. It would need the efforts of several men to roll the stone clear of the entrance. The women would not be capable of doing this. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
16:12 The appearance to 'two of them' is the same incident as Luke 24:33. The appearance to 'the eleven'(Mark 16:13) is the same time as recorded in Luke 24:36 and John 20:19. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
WONDERFUL WOMEN of FAITH These women Mark 16:1 could do very little in the eyes of the world - * They couldn't speak before the Sanhedrin in Jesus' defense * They couldn't appeal to Piot * They couldn't stand against the crowds * They couldn't overpower the Roman guards BUT THEY DID WHAT THEY COULD - * They stayed at the cross when the disciples had fled * They followed Jesus' body to the tomb * They prepared spices for his body * They took advantage of what they could do for Christ, instead of what they couldn't do THEREFORE - they were the first to witness the resurrection Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
16:7 In singling Peter out to be told about the resurrection as well as the disciples of which Peter was one indicates that Jesus saw Peter had a particular need. After all Jesus had seen Peter leave the trial weeping - Matt 26:75. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Every time we read the account of Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection, we cannot help but be impressed with the exceptional love and loyalty that the women following him displayed. They were at Calvary when Jesus was put to death. They were in the garden when Jesus was buried, and now very early in the morning, they are there once again, in order to anoint the body. On more than one occasion we have it heard asked: Where were the eleven? John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
Vs.15,16 Jesus tells His disciples to preach the Gospel. The Lord's prescription, for salvation, is clear. The command to preach and the way of salvation have remained relevant throughout the ages. Vs.17,18 The signs accompanying believers were relevant in the first century when Holy Spirit gifts were given to help spread the Gospel. During the first century the Scriptures were completed. Holy Spirit gifts then ceased because, with the finished Bible, signs were no longer necessary to promote the Gospel. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:1-3 These details emphasise to us that beyond any shadow of a doubt the women did not expect Jesus to rise from the dead. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.16 This verse leaves no doubt that belief (in the Gospel) and baptism are two essential elements of salvation. Without them a person is condemned. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:18 The taking up of serpents and not being hurt is seen to be fulfilled in the life of Paul – Acts 28:5. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Baptism (lesson 3 of 20 from "Outline of Basic Bible Teachings" by Wes Booker I. Is it essential for salvation? Mark 16:15-16. meaning of word - "dip or plunge" II. Verses on baptism: A. John 3:3-5 - necessary to enter the kingdom B. Acts 2:37-38 - repentance needed first C. Acts 8:12 - knowledge of the gospel is needed D. Acts 8:36-39 - v.39: "when they came up out of the water" implies complete immersion E. Acts 9:17-19 - Saul (Paul) baptized F. Acts 10:44-48 - Gentiles first baptized G. Acts 16:25-33 - compare v.31 and v.33 H. Acts 22:12-16 - wash away sins I. Titus 3:4-7 - washing of regeneration (rebirth - NIV) J. Gal 3:26-29 - Abraham's seed III. What it symbolizes - death, burial, resurrection of Christ: A. Rom 6:3-5 B. Col 2:10-13 IV. Wrested scriptures: A. Matt 18:3-6 - note context: the need for childlike qualities B. 1Cor 1:17 - note context: it's irrelevant whether Paul was baptizer or someone else did the baptizing Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
16:3 The women knew that there was an obstacle (the stone) in the way of carrying out their work for their master. They did not allow this thought (this obstacle) to stop them in the work of their master, they started out even though they knew there was an obstacle in the way of fulfilling this work. How many times when we are in our masters service do we have obstacles ahead only to find a way has been prepared. Exhortation, there are many obstacles on the way as we walk towards the Kingdom/in our masters service, these must not make us sit at home or give up. This would be the mind of the servant with the one talent (Matt 25:24-25), we must remember the words of our master and take courage (Mark 10:27). Pete Barrett [Milnsbridge UK] Comment added in 2009 reply to Pete |
||||||||||
V.5 This young man found sitting was a divine angel (See Matt 28:2). Have you noticed that all the divine angels mentioned in the Bible were of male form? For example: the three men who came to Abraham (Gen 18:2); the angel who came to Samson’s parents (Judg 12:11-13); Gabriel who appeared to Daniel and Mary (Dan 8:16; Luke 1:19) etc. were all males. All divine angels reflected the image and glory of Yahweh. Man was made in the image of Yahweh (elohim, both a term which means the mighty ones (angels); but a term which can apply to Yahweh Himself (Gen 1:26). But, woman was made from man (Gen 2:22,23). And so, divine angels do not have a female form. However, women who are redeemed at the judgment will be like the angels in that they will attain immortality like them (Luke 20:36). But, more important, the Redeemed will be placed higher than the angels, in the future divine hierarchy. Jesus has obtained a higher status than the angels because of His inheritance (Heb 1:4). Those of His redeemed brothers and sisters will join Him, in that inheritance, and help Him rule in the Kingdom (Rev 20:6). The divine angels will be there to assist Jesus and the Redeemed in their roles. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:10-14 Notice the way in which Mark, by the spirit of inspiration, stresses that the disciples did not believe. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| It would appear from the references to white robes in Revelation that the young man in v5 is not an angel, but Jesus himself. The white robe is given to those who have finished their race and overcome the world (Rev 3:5, 6:11, 7:9,13-14). Is this possible given the evidence of the other gospel accounts? Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
||||||||||