|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 1
v.10,12 - Our modern view of the worth of this life leaves us horrified at
these acts of God. We surely do well to remember to put this present life - our
time of temptation and trial and desperate need for God's grace, into perspective
- recognising its worth for what it really is - a chance to prove ourselves worthy
of eternity, not, of course, by our own deeds, which cannot make us righteous,
but by our faith in the saving power of God through the blood of his Son, and
in his willingness to save us from sin by his grace. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1v.2
The enquiry of Beelzebub highlights Ahaziah's faithlessness. Israel should have
taught the nations about Yahweh rather than go to those nations and their Gods
for support. 2 v.24 The way in which the bears killed the forty two 'children' shows that Leviticus 26:22 was fulfilled on them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.3
- Here we have just the situation which we looked at yesterday. This time God
intervenes directly to send the answer. Let us hope that in our lives, God sees
fit to intervene and make sure that wherever we choose to enquire, we get His
answer. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:9-16 One wonders why Ahaziah thought he could take Elijah given that Jezebel had not managed it. Even if he had thought to try after the deaths of the two bands of fifty he would stop. 2:2,4,6 The way in which Elijah tried to get Elisha not to go with him proved a test of Elisha's willingness to go wherever he was required I the service of God. Obstacles might be put in our way in our work in Christ but they should not stop our activity. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:4 Elijah's warning to Ahaziah 'shalt surely die' quotes Genesis 2:17 - thus emphasising the reason for his death = He was following the way of the serpent. 2:23-24 The taunt 'go up thou bald head' would seem to be a taunt based upon the fact that Elijah had gone up in a chariot. The 'little children', having seen the end of the prophet Elijah, were looking for Elisha to disappear off the scene in the same way. An indication that these 'little children' were pleased to see the end of a prophet of the Lord. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 2
Kings1:6 - Therefore you shall not come down from the bed where you have gone
up, but shall surely die. There is supreme irony in this. Remember that Elijah
had said joked with the prophets that maybe the gods where asleep and so couldn't
hear them calling (Beelzebub of Ekron being one of them) (1Kings18:27). Now he tells Ahaziah that HE will not come down from HIS bed. Highlighting this irony underlines the supreme power Yahweh had over the situation. Ross Melles [] Comment added in 2003 reply to Ross |
||||||||||
1:10 The way in which Elijah called down fire on those who sought to take him is the basis for the way in which the two witnesses (Rev 11:5) behave. 2:15 The resting of the spirit of Elijah on Elisha is like the holy spirit descending like a dove (Matt 3:16) on Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 2:23 This episode serves as a reminder to all disciples that they are not promised that there will be no sadness or tribulation in their service. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Elisha commenced his ministry by using Elijah's mantle to open the Jordan waters. Was that a symbol of Christ coming to His Promised Land, ie the Kingdom? God Willing I would like to explore possible "types" in the following days when we read the account of Elisha. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
Vs.2,4,6 Elijah asked Elisha to tarry three times but he refused to leave him. This echoes Naomi and Ruth. Naomi urged Ruth to return to her people three times but she refused to leave (Ruth 1:8,12, 15-17). These episodes demonstrate loyalty beyond the loyalty to either Elijah or Naomi. They really display loyalty to Yahweh, the God of Elijah and Naomi. A contrast to consider is that of Peter's denial (Matt 26:69-75). Peter turned away from his master Jesus, three times, by wilful denial. Elisha turned to his master Elijah, three times ,by staying with him. What do we choose to do with our master? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| 2:14 The waving of the mantle on the river, and the miraculous division of the waters consequent upon it, was an evidence that the Lord God of Elijah was with him, and as this miracle was witnessed by the scholars of the prophets from Jericho, they forthwith reconized Elisha as now the prophet of Israel. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
1:13 The third captain had a dilemma. He had to obey the king – because he believed in God! So he did the king’s bidding and then pleaded with the prophet. 2:19-24 Jericho was the first city taken by Joshua. But it was ‘barren’. Elisha healed the bareness. Bethel – the house of God, on the other hand, as barren of spiritual youths for it was from there that they came and mocked Elisha. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2:11 Elijah was taken up to (or into) heaven. The word heaven in Hebrew is shamayim, which means the sky, as well as God's dwelling place. It is clear that in Elijah's case it means the former. 2:16,17 Why would the prophets be intent on searching for Elijah if their belief was that he was transported to God's dwelling place? The fact that Yahweh did not want Elijah to be found does not alter the fact that he was buried on earth. Yahweh did not want Moses' burial site to be found either (Deut 34:6). And, John confirms that the only man ever to be in the presence of Yahweh in heaven, His dwelling place, is the risen Christ (John 1:18 - see the KJV rather than modern versions, in this case). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
1:2 In going to Ekron to enquire of Beelzebub God was affronted. Given the king did not rely on God He simply stated that He was still active. His death was the evidence of that. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:15-16 So the king receives the same message as he had already heard in verse :4. One wonders whether he had thought that if he had seen the prophet face to face he would have got a different message. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
The Book of 2 Kings spans a three-hundred year history from the rebellion of Moab to the collapse of Judah. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:18 The Biblical narrative are always highly selective. They are God’s view of events. Not those of a mere historian. So we learn, here, that God wants us to focus on just one event in the life of Ahaziah. That event shows his complete reliance upon the false gods and lack of reliance upon the God of Israel. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:1 Moab, had been subdued by David. But in the reign of Ahaziah, Moab rebelled against Israel (2Kin 3:4,5). It would be in the reign of Jehoram, Ahaziah’s son, that Edom would, similarly, rebel against Israel (2Chron 21:8-10) . 1:2 Baal-Zebub (Lord of the Fly), the god of the Philistines, is the god to whom the Pharisees accredited Jesus’ miraculous power (Matt 12:24). 1:9 Ahaziah, the son of Ahab and Jezebel, had been taught idolatry well. But, he knew full well who Elijah was, also. Instead of acceding to Elijah’s words from Yahweh, Ahaziah had the gall to think that he could apprehend Yahweh’s prophet. Unfortunate, disastrous results followed (vs.9-12). 1:17 Yahweh’s will was accomplished, but only after the arrogance of Ahaziah had cost 100 lives. 2:9 Elisha asked for a double portion of Yahweh’s spirit. We know that Elisha received this double portion because everything that Elisha did was twice what Elijah did. For example, the famine under Elijah was three-and-a-half years long, while the famine under Elisha was seven years in length (2Kin 8:1;James 5:17). As you read, look for other examples. 2:12 Prophets were allowed to rend their garments (in grief), but a high priest, under the Law, was not allowed to do this (Lev 21:10). However, that did not stop Caiaphas at the trial of Jesus (Matt 26:65). 2:21,22 Elisha is a Christ-type. When Jesus returns to earth, He will heal the waters of the Salt Sea, and life will return, and the countryside will flourish (Eze 47:10; Zech 14:8). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
2:16 The thought that the ‘spirit of the Lord’ had transported Elijah to another place is consistent with Obadiah’s thoughts – 1Kin 18:12 - earlier where he expressed the view that Elijah was not easy to find because of God’s involvement in his life. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2Kin 1:2 - Ahaziah ignored the commands for safety (Deut 22:8). 2Kin 1:8 - Elijah somewhat resembled John the Baptist (Matt 3:4). 2Kin 1:13-15 - at the third time Elijah rose up and life was spared; perhaps the groups of 50 (2Kin 1:9-14;2Kin 2:7,16) echo the millenial judgment day where some are not accepted and the day of Jubilee where some who humbled themselves before God are freed from bondage to sin and death. 2Kin 2:8,14 - perhaps we have an echo here of the baptisms by John the Baptist and of those baptized in Christ. 2Kin 2:17 - at the end of three days no body was found; John 20:2 - Christ's tomb was empty at the end of three days as he rose up and was given life. 2Kin 2:11 - perhaps we have an echo of Christ ascending into heaven (Acts 1:9-11;John 3:13). 2Kin 2:2 - this "Gilgal" [(1537) means "a wheel, rolling"] probably was not the low lying Gilgal at the Jordan where Israel was circumsized a second time on entering the holy land when the reproach of Egypt was rolled away (Josh 5:2,9); the lower lying "Bethel" [(1008) means "house of God"] was named by Jacob who had the vision of a ladder that linked heaven and earth (Gen 28:10-22;Gen 35:14-15). 2Kin 2:4 - "Jericho" [(3405) means "fragrant, city of palms, city of the moon, its month"] has some explanatory references (Deut 34:3;2Chron 28:15;Judg 1:16). 2Kin 2:6,14,15 - "Jordan" [(3383) means "descender, a descender"] is aptly named as the river starts from snow covered Mount Hermon 9000 feet above sea level and descends to the Dead Sea 1390 feet below sea level; along the way the Jordan passes through a city named "Adam" (Josh 3:16) and goes from life to death in the Dead Sea, perhaps symbolic of the progress of mankind which terminates in the grave; three men were magnified in the eyes of their contemporaries through crossing or coming out of the Jordan - first was "Joshua" (Heb. means "Yahweh will save" - Josh 3:7,10), second was "Elisha" (Heb. means "God is salvation") and third was "Jesus" (Grk. means "Yahweh will save" - Matt 3:17) who conquered the power of the flesh as it flowed from Adam to the corrupting Sea of Death - Jesus now guides believers through the waters of baptism to the promised land. 2Kin 2:9-11 - this inheritance of a double portion may suggest the right of succession as with the first born and thus may be an echo of Christ (Deut 21:17;Rom 8:29). 2Kin 2:19-22 - making water wholesome or healed by using salt may have a symbolic meaning in that water sometimes suggests teaching from the word (John 4:6-15;John 7:37-38;1Cor 3:6;Eph 5:26) and salt which can indicate a covenant (such as the covenant to Abraham) and is added to a sacrifice, perhaps suggests purity, healing and preserving (Num 18:19;Lev 2:13) - Christ's sacrifice offers a purification, healing and preservation of those in the Word. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.2
- The word 'standard' (nec 05251) is interesting
here. It is clear from other passages that this refers often (possibly on every
one of its 20 occurrences) to the raising up of Jesus on the cross. Here we have
the sacrifice of Christ referred to as that which will break the evil worship
of Babylon. Here are some of the other passages: Num.21:8,9
(pole) Psa.60:4 (banner) Isa.5:26 11:10,12 (ensign). Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.34
Yahweh planned to give Israel rest after their wandering [Deuteronomy
3:20] This promise is picked up by Joshua [Joshua
22:4 23:1] But was not fully achieved but Solomon saw it when the temple was
erected and dedicated when he had been made king [1
Kings 8:56 1 Chronicles 23:25] But this was only a shadow - the destruction
of Babylon - the symbol of all that offends picked up in Revelation will bring
in that rest - [Jeremiah
50:34] So let us labour to enter -- [Hebrews
4:11] Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.6
- There is much talk of lost sheep, led astray by corrupt leaders, but the purpose
of Jesus was that he might gather such people together and offer them true leadership.
These people included David (Psa.119:176),
and all of us (Isa.53:6).
Jesus came for these - (Matt.9:36,
10:6) - that we might be returned to the Shepherd and Bishop of our souls
(1Pet.2:25) Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| And so the punishment
of Babylon (50:1)
will provide the means for the return of Israel. (50:19).
Whilst we know that this is what happened those Jews going into captivity would
have to believe the words of the prophet. However for those who were faithful
these words, repeating the message of restoration in earlier chapters, would have
been a great comfort. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| We have seen (Chapter
12, 24, 31) links with the song of Miriam when Israel were delivered from Egypt.
We have another one here :19
'habitation' Exodus
15:2. The deliverance from Egypt is a powerful message of deliverance that
was to be re enacted when Israel came out of Babylon and will ultimately be fulfilled
when their Messiah comes and they all turn to the Lord. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 50:38 The drying up of the waters (Euphrates) is the basis for Rev 16:12 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.24 This prophecy against Babylon forms an appropriate conclusion to the series. The nations immediately bordering upon Palstine have had their fate foretold, and now the tool was in turn to fall because they became proud with their conquests, and would not be healed Jer 52:9 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Vs.1,2 The overthrow of Babylon was not synonymous with Nebuchadnezzar. Nebuchadnezzar II ruled Babylon from 605 to 562 BC. Cyrus II moved into Babylon (without a fight) in 539 BC. At that time, Nabonidus ruled Babylon through his son, Belshazzar, who acted as regent. Babylon is characterized as evil, the symbol of which is carried forward to Revelation. But, this has more to do with Nimrod's Babylon than Nebuchadnezzar's. In fact, Yahweh had a special relationship with Nebuchadnezzar. He taught him, chastised him, and groomed him. In the process, Nebuchadnezzar humbled himself. This was not unlike our own experiences with Yahweh. Through Yahweh's forgiveness and mercy, we cannot discount Nebuchadnezzar's being in the Kingdom. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| a) Now comes two long chapters about God’s future punishments on Babylon. I wonder if Judah would realise that when Babylon was conquered, then they, the Jews, would be able to return to their land? See for example Jer 50:28,33-34. Cyrus, the conqueror of Babylon, made the proclamation for the Jews to return in the first year of his reign, (Ezra 1:1-4). b) God also gave a wonderful promise to the men of Judah, in Jer 50:17-20. He said that just as He had punished Assyria, who took Israel captive, so He would punish Babylon who was to take Judah captive. Samaria fell in 721BC, and Nineveh the capital of Assyria fell in 606. Judah would have lived through both events. Jerusalem then fell in 587 (although you cannot be really certain about dates.) David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
50:19 In saying that He will bring Israel ‘to his habitation’ the prophet is quoting the song of Moses– Exo 15:2 – showing that there would be a deliverance like the Exodus from Egypt in due time. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.10,11 Yahweh will destroy the wicked, but it does not give Him pleasure to do so (Eze 33:11). He expects His own people to have the same attitude (Prov 24:17). It is no wonder, then, that Babylon would be destroyed because they took pleasure in the downfall of Judah. Babylon's pride would ensure its destruction (Prov 16:18; vs.31,32). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
50:4 Notice that it is ‘Israel and Judah’ that are to return. This did not happen in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah. Only Judah returned at that time. Israel had been taken captive by the Assyrians some time earlier. Therefore this prophecy will only be completely fulfilled when Christ returns and Israel are finally regathered. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 50:24 Babylon was taken unexpectedly. Cyrus took Babylon by diverting the Euphrates. By this strategy the Persians threw themselves so unexpectedly upon the city, that when the outer parts of the city had been taken, those who lived in the center of the city were not aware of the fact that they had been overtaken. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
V.2 The chief god of Babylon was Merodach (Marduk) sometimes referred to as Bel (equivalent to Baal meaning master). Merodach (Marduk) was considered, by the Babylonians, as the creator of all things. He was honored as king in an annual ceremony. All Babylonian rulers were considered his sons, and his name is reflected in some of their names, like Merodach Baladan and Evil Merodach. To clarify, the her in the phrases her idols; her images, refers to Babylon and not to the god Merodach (Marduk). This is qualified by the her(s) of v.3. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
50:4 That Israel and Judah will come ‘with weeping’ is the time when Zech 12:10 says Israel will recognise Jesus as their Messiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
50:6 God had promised a ‘rest’ which was their entry into the land under Joshua. However the people had rebelled against God’s offer right from those days right up to now. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.3 The Medes are referenced here. Vs.4,5,19 These verses are talking about the restoration of the temple and the Land under Nehemiah. V.21 Merathaim means double rebellion, and is an epithet for Babylon. Pekod (means visitation) is another name pertinent to Babylon, as she would be visited in judgment (v.27). V.37 The mingled people (KJV); foreign troops (ESV) were also part of total Babylon (e.g. Jer 25:20,24). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
You may have been wondering why this prophecy is completely incorrect. Or that's what we would think if we applied it to Babylon's fall to the Medes and Persians. As has already been said in other comments for this chapter, Cyrus took the city quickly and almost peacefully. We can see in Daniel's account that he merely switched allegiance and served the new regime. Yet in this prophecy there is total destruction:
This picture is much more like the vision we see in Revelation 18, where in v19 it says "in one hour she is made desolate". So we need to ask ourselves the question: "how is it that Babylon is still standing at the end time?". And if so, where is it now? The site in Iraq is desert and ruins. The answer, simply, is that Babylon was handed down from one empire to the next. Babylon was establised at the time of Babel, seen again with Assyria and resurfacing as a name again with Babylon of Nebuchadnezzar fame. Then handed down to Cyrus and Darius who was conquired by Alexander the Great, a Greek. Again, he just walked into the city and adopted it and its idolatry. So history, and the Bible confirm this, since Daniel's image shows each of these empires as part of the same image (Dan 2). We could call that image Babylon if we wanted to. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
50:6 That Israel had been ‘lost sheep’ and their shepherds had neglected them is also the theme of Ezekiel to those in captivity – Eze 34:1-22. Ezekiel makes the same point as Jeremiah – that the ‘lost sheep’ will be saved. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.7
quotes
Exo.32:6-8. It is so easy to dismiss these atrocities as things that are not
part of our lives in this enlightened(?) age, and yet this chapter makes it quite
clear that these passages are for our learning. Could this accusation be levelled
at us in this modern age of leisure activities? What do we do between eating and
sleeping? Is it God's work, or is it something else? This is what this chapter
is asking us to assess in ourselves. How much do we indulge ourselves in the readily
accessible and available entertainment, and how much do we choose to follow the
ways of God through active study and works? Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| The wilderness
journey is used in a precise way to address the problems of the brethren and sisters
in Corinth 10:6 they also lusted Numbers 11:4 10:7 the people ... rose up to play Exodus 32:6 Thus we can see that even a young gentile ecclesia was expected to have a knowledge and understanding of the Old Testament Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 10:1-5
The argument here is that even though one is baptised into Christ this does not
guarantee everlasting life. It is the same argument as Hebrews 3 and Jude 5. We
should realise why Israel fell in the wilderness - it was through lack of faith.
They did not believe that God would keep his Word. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :11
In saying 'these things' 'are written for our admonition' reinforces the point
made in 9:10. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| A race of slave people; nomad people; living in an arid wilderness, eating miracle food and drinking miracle water. Each had miracle shoes which never wore out, and went everywhere on foot. No cars, bicycles, boats, or aeroplanes. No fridges, freezers, vacuum cleaners, radios, cd players, electric blankets, personal computers, or even roofs over their heads.
Yet strangely these people are held up for us as an example. In v1-4 Paul says that they were part of God's ecclesia as we are. In v11 he says explicitly that we are to think of them as our examples. And what's the reason for this? Because "with most of them was God not best pleased" (v5). These people whose lives are recorded for us, can save us from the fate that they suffered, because by looking at their fate we can take warning. If we will only take an honest look at our own way of life, and compare it to theirs, we may turn our hearts to God and save ourselves from such judgment. The warning of Paul is quite clear. "with most of them was God not best pleased, for their bodies were scattered in the wilderness". If we are not to be amongst the majority who will likewise perish, we need to heed the warning…. "let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall" (v12). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| 10:26-28 The twofold use of Psa 2:4 'the earth is the Lord's ...' shows that because all things belong to God it is acceptable to eat in ignorance things offered to idols but by the same token if one knows the unacceptable origins of the mean then one must not eat. This highlights that one is not guilty of another's sin simply by being with that person. It is knowledge that brings responsibility, not simply being near them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.1 to have come out of "Egypt" was no more a guarantee of entry into the "Promised Land" for the Corinthians than for the Israelites. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
1Cor 10:13 - All of us have been tempted/tried (3985) some more than others. We read here that God will not let us be tempted beyond what we can bear but will provide a way of escape. Noting how some are sorely tried one Sister had an interesting insight on this passage. She suggested we might be tempted/tried more than we think we can endure but not more than we can truly bear. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
- Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
10:1-4 Notice the repetition of ‘all’. This might seem almost unnecessary. However against the background of the divided and partisan ecclesia at Corinth it is important as it emphasises the unity of the ecclesia. We are all in the same situation whoever we are. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| SPIRITUAL PROVISION Paul makes some interesting observations. Speaking of the time when Israel were in the wilderness with Moses, he says, "They all were baptised into Moses in the cloud and in the sea. They all ate the same spiritual food and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ." (1Cor 10:2-5) As we look back on the wilderness journey we can see in hindsight the significance of where they came from, where they went to, and of all the evenets along the way. But I wonder, did Israel at the time recognise the significance of their baptism in the Red Sea, or of the bread of God, or of the living water, or of the rock that was Christ? I also wonder whether we would have noted the significance of these spiritual adventures had we been in the same position as Israel was. Right up to today, God is still calling out a people for his name - just as he did when he called Israel out of Egypt. And just as Israel had a spiritual journey through the wilderness, so we have embarked on a spiritual journey towards God's promised kingdom. Let us be alert to the spiritual provisions in our own lives so that we keep our hearts centered on God. Remember that sometimes they may be disguised as something quite ordinary, such as fleeing the Egyptians while running through the Red Sea. But if we open our eyes we will see the spiritual lessons and provisions that are sent from God Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
V.24 The epitome of Christ was His selfless character (1John 3:16). Paul exhorts brethren to be like Him when he says: Let no one seek his own good, but the good of his neighbor (ESV). If we could just remember this one thing, then the problems between ourselves would not exist. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
10:15In speaking of the Corinthians as ‘wise’ and asking them to ‘judge’ Paul is harking back to his words to them in 1Cor 6:5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
V.4 All events in humankind's existence have Jesus at the center. Paul talks about the spiritual rock in the wilderness journey being Jesus. He is indicating that Jesus, as Messiah, was (and continues to be) central to the existence and purpose of the nation of Israel. It does not mean that Jesus pre-existed His birth (it is impossible to pre-exist oneself) and was, actually, present in the wilderness with Israel. However, His purpose was. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
V.2 Moses was a type of Christ. He was the mediator of the Old Covenant. Israel was baptized (symbolic acceptance) into the Old Covenant. Jesus fulfilled the Old Covenant (Matt 5:17). He became the mediator of the New Covenant (Heb 12:24). To be spiritually associated with Jesus, one must be baptized into His name, after believing the Gospel He taught (Mark 16:16). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
10:1-5 The repeated ‘all’ is contrasted with ‘many’. Potentially all of those who me out of Egypt could have entered the land of promise. However the experiences of life caused many to fall and die in the wilderness. This is the warning that Paul is presenting to these Corinthians who rested in their ‘knowledge’ Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.2 being baptized into Moses meant into the covenant which he mediated. Those who were thus covenanted were obliged to keep the Law. Likewise, the true followers of Christ are baptized into Him, as the mediator of the New Covenant. They are obliged to keep the laws of Christ. V.4 The Rock produced water to the people in the desert. But, the Rock that followed them. How is that possible that the Rock followed them? It appears that the Rock, here, is a metonymy for the water which sustained the people on their wilderness journey. The Rock describes Yahweh as Israel’s savior (Psa 95:1). Yahweh gave His Son, Jesus to be the savior of the world (Acts 4:12). Jesus is available to all. People only have to partake of the water of life which pours from this living Rock (John 7:38). V.13 This is comforting when we meet the trials that will inevitably confront those who serve Yahweh. V.32 An offence is really a sin against Yahweh. Therefore, we should not be the cause of anyone's stumbling so as to commit sin. This kind of offence should never be confused with the modern definition of offence as a feeling of annoyance or resentment. However, as people of peace, we should still endeavor not to upset people on any level, if we can avoid it. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
V.10 Murmuring (grumbling) is not acceptable for the follower of Jesus (John 6:43). V.12 If we are satisfied with our walk, then we had better re-evaluate the situation really quickly (Eph 5:15). V.13 It is sure that trials and temptations will beset the disciple of Jesus. They are tests of faith, and opportunities to gain character. Accept them, and deal with them in faith. Then success will follow. If one complains and becomes angry, then failure will ensue (James 1:2,3). Vs.16-18 This is a profound truth. All true believers in Jesus, His brothers and sisters, are one bread, one body because they are all one in Christ. They are the temple of God. Should brothers and sisters not, therefore, have love and respect for each other, seeing that this is such a high calling? (1Cor 3:16). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
10:14 In calling the believers in Corinth ‘wise men’ he is haring back to their own claims to have ‘knowledge’1Cor 8:11 for example. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1Cor 10:1-4 - they drank from the same spiritual rock which was Christ. John 4:7-15 - Christ will give living water / eternal life. Num 20:2-13 - Moses struck the rock and he echoed Israel smiting Christ - in each case thirst was quenched be it literally or spiritually. Rev 21:6-7 - the water of life to he who overcomes. The above was derived from a talk given by Roy Buser (4/11/10). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
v13 is important. When we escape temptation we may feel personally that God has worked miracles to achieve it. And our escape may simply be down to the timing of events, so that no-one else knows how close a call we've had. This lesson is acted out for us in the old testament, where David was in an impossible situation, yet God gave him a miraculous escape. He called the place the "rock of escape" so that everyone else would know it too (1Sam 23:24-28). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
||||||||||