September 1

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - 2Kings  6
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to 2Kings 6 online in the King James Version
Listen to 2Kings 6 online in the New International Version

 

v.6 - The word 'stick' here is normally translated 'tree'. It is possible that there was quite a lot of effort involved therefore in retrieving this axe. Maybe a tree was put across the river for the man to go out on to retrieve it. It is a different picture altogether from throwing a stick into the water and then the iron floating near the river bank. Just a thought - and of a little significance, as it suggests that effort is needed on our part before God will bring about blessings in our life, which we know to be true.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.1 This is the last reference to the sons of the prophets. These individuals are the remnant of the good work which Samuel established during his long period as Judge and prophet in Israel. He established the schools of the prophets, one of which is mentioned in Naioth 1 Samuel 19:18 - Naioth means 'dwelling'. Other schools were in Bethel Gilgal Mizpeh and Ramah.
This comment shows that the good work of Samuel carried on well after his death. Whilst the historical record hardly mentions Samuel's work in the connection it is clear that he did a great deal of good. In like manner we may do a great Work by careful and diligent effort, but it may well not be seen easily - just the long term benefits show.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.16,17 - The implication here is that there are those who can see the hosts of the Lord which encamp around those that fear Him, and those that can't. What a wonderful reason to increase the use of our eye of faith. Let us practise continually that these things might also be in our vision and remain there.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

Elements of this chapter form the basis for language in Isaiah 49

place too strait for us
Isaiah 49:20
open his eyes that he may see
Isaiah 49:8
sent them away

Isaiah 49:25

We should be aware that elements of the history of Israel recorded in the historical books often form the basis for later teaching.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:29 The way that the woman boiled her son and her fellow hid hers shows that the curses of Deuteronomy 28:53, 55 have come upon Israel - because of their sinfulness.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Your comment about the tree sent me to the Aramaic version that reads. "And the prophet of God said to him, Where did it fall? And he showed him the place.
And he cut off a stick and thrust it in there; and it stuck in the hole of the axe head. And he said, Take it up to you. And he put out his hand and took it.

(With this version, it would have been a long stick or the axe head was fairly close to the shore). Either way, effort was required.


Jean Cheetham [Moorestown New Jersey (US)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Jean
6:30-31 What a strange king! On the one hand he is in mourning in sackcloth and on the other hand he wishes to kill Elisha, the prophet of God. 

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

V.30 All this time Elisha was living in the city, still a trusted councillor, but the plight of the city and the sorry story of a woman he had just heard brought Joram to a decision.(V.31) Joram had reckoned without the hand of God. Not only was Elisha aware of the king's intention, but he was also ready with the news of the raising of the siege. Even to such a king, "son of a murderer" (v.32) as Elisha described him, was granted deliverance by the hand of God.


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
The account of the iron swimming surely speaks of resurrection.  But the iron axe head only rose to the surface when the stick was also thrown into the river.  If "the stick" symbolises the "Tree of Life", a recurrent theme in Scripture, then in this story surely we have an account of man being raised from the dead, by the act of Christ dying and rising again.  The types we have been following in these recent chapters about Elisha surely are emphasised by today's chapter. Jews return and are given their land back, Gentiles (Naaman) are washed clean, and now the dead are raised.
"The mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha." (2Kin 6:17). Such is the angelic presence around them that fear Him, invisible now to the human eye, but probably to be seen in the Kingdom.  The enemies of God, or those who would have been enemies, are to be brought to Christ's throne, and will be converted or destroyed.

David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David
V.22 Elisha was not of a vengeful spirit and refused to consent to such aggressive treatment, ordering instead that the captives should be given food and drink and allowed to go back to SYria unmolested.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

 

V.13 The incident at Dothan shows to us that what we see with the eye of objective reality is not the complete picture.  If we had the veil of sight lifted, then we would see the glorious reality of Yahweh at work.  One day this shall be so, but until then we must try to elevate our view to that of faith rather than sight. 

Dothan is about eleven miles north-east of Samaria, and so it was quite a journey to lead the blind.  Dothan is where Joseph sought his brothers before being hustled off to Egypt (Gen 37:17).  His brothers were blinded as to Yahweh's purpose with Joseph, and it took a time and a journey (to Egypt) before they received their sight.

V.24 The siege of Samaria was a terrible occurrence.  It shows how, even in the best regulated and lawful societies, human nature can deteriorate to its base behavior. 

V.25 The expression dove's dung does not refer to a bird's excrement but rather to a rough pulse which could have been made from peas, lentils, or other available seeds. A cab is equivalent to 2 imperial quarts, or 1.9 liters. 

Just to show the exorbitant prices being asked for items during the siege, at today's prices: an ass's head cost $517, while a fourth part of a cab of pulse cost $8. 

Vs. 28,29 Cannibalism, in the face of starvation, is a startling example of how easily a close society can breakdown under extreme pressure.

V.32 Although the name of the king is not revealed in this incident, it is Jehoram.  The clue is where Elisha mentions the king as this son of a murderer, a reference to Ahab, Jehoram's father. 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

6:4,8  Notice ‘Jordan’ – the river that Naaman as to wash in and ‘the king of Syria’ – Naaman’s lord. There are threads running through these chapters which link together the seeming unconnected events.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

 

V.21 The King of Israel, Jehoram, called Elisha father.  Later Joash would do the same (2Kin 13:14). Indeed, Elijah was called father by Elisha himself (2Kin 2:12). 

This appellation seems at odds with the interdiction of Jesus (Matt 23:9).  However, if seen in perspective, it is not contradictory.  Jesus' comment in Matt 23:9 is part of a tirade against the Pharisees (Matt 23:2-33).  Jesus accused them of being hypocrites and false leaders, and warned his disciples not to recognize them as true spiritual representatives.  (The warning extends to all subsequent false leaders also). 

On the other hand, Elijah and Elisha were true representatives of Yahweh.  Thus, they acted as spiritual fathers and were identified as such.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

6:22-23 Israel were delivered from their enemy and their enemy was also delivered. God is not concerned to destroy men but to save them. Isa 49:25 – uses similar language and ideas to speak of the deliverance of Israel from the hand of their enemies and ultimate deliverance.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
OPEN OUR EYES
 
I wonder how often Elisha could see angels. Although the record is brief, we hear no hint of surprise from Elisha in seeing either the army of Aram surrounding the city he was in, or the incredibly large army of angels God had sent to protect Elisha. No one else could see the angels that were visible to Elisha until he prayed that his servants eyes would be opened. Then, to the servant's surprise, he saw "the hills full of horses and chariots of fire all around Elisha." (2Kin 6:18)
 
It was not that the servant was able to see new things. The things he saw were already there. He had his eyes opened and was now able to see things he was previously blind to.
 
I have been constantly amazed at the results of the times I have asked for my eyes to be opened as I have read God's word. Times I have thought that there was nothing more to glean from a Bible passage have proved me very wrong. God has opened up for me some amazing insights into his word as I was released from some of the blindness I have been afflicted with.
 
We can't see angels. We are often blind to the beauties of God's word. Let's ask God to open our blind eyes so that we can get to know him in a much more full and complete way.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Robert

 

In Ch. 5 we saw the King of Aram giving his army commander, Naaman, permission to travel to Israel in search of a cure for his leprosy.  Naaman was successfully cured by the intervention of Elisha and returned home a believer in Yahweh (5:18). 

Yet now in Ch. 6, we see Aram at war with Israel. I suspect that the King of Aram in Ch. 5 is not the same king in Ch. 6.  It would seem unlikely that Naaman would have lead the army against Israel.  The span of time covering 2 Kings Chs. 1-13 is fifty years (850-800 BC).  And so, the time difference between the events of Ch. 5 and Ch. 6 could have allowed for much change.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

The King was absolutely right when he said "Surely this calamity is from the LORD!" (v33). It had appeared in prophecy in exact detail, see Deut 28:52-55. So even though he was angry enough to want to kill Elisha (v31) it shows that he was on the right track, the track to repentance. This was the reason God brought catastrophy upon Israel in the first place, as we can read in Deut 28. He wanted them to turn back to Him. The fact that the King was wearing sack-cloth further demonstrates his state of mind (v30).

When we see others angry at God, we shouldn't fear the worst. Someone who is angry at God at least believes God is working in his life, and may be at the very point of repentance. Job is a good example of someone who was angry in his afflictions, yet learned from it.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Rob

6:1 That the place was too small for the sons of the prophets is taken up by the prophet – Isa 49:20 – to speak of the increase of the disciples of Jesus.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.6 Elisha, like Elijah before him, was a type of Christ.  Therefore, we should expect to learn something about Jesus through Elisha's dealings.  In the example shown here, there are two components: a stick (branch of a tree); and iron.  

Throwing a branch in the water was not necessary for Elisha to make the iron axe-head float.  He was illustrating a point.  Because of sin, human beings are under the weight (iron) of death (Psa 107:10). 

But, Jesus lifted that burden (i.e. iron floated) by His sacrifice on the cross (i.e. from a tree).  Moreover, He was endorsed as the promised Branch by other prophets (Isa 11:1;Jer 23:5,15; Zech 3:8,12).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

6:11-12 Isn’t it interesting that the Syrians realised that the prophet of God could know what they were doing? Clearly they had some awareness of the powers of Yahweh.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.15 We are equivalent to the servant of Elisha.  Elisha is a Christ-type and we are the servants of Jesus.  Like the servant of Elisha, we are limited in our understanding.  Elisha’s servant was shown a reality that exists, but which cannot be seen with human faculties. 

Let us remember that this divine reality is being played out before us.  We believe that angels attend us (Psa 34:7; Heb 1:14).  And yet, we do not see them during their activities.  Nevertheless, they really are present.  If our eyes were to be opened, like Elijah’s servant, we would actually see our angel at work.  Right now, we rest on our faith, but in the Kingdom, we shall see all (1Cor 13:12).

That Yahweh's angel attends us should give us encouragement and confidence in the knowledge that we are not alone.  By the same token, seeing that our angel is actually present with us, would we really want to do that questionable activity, in plain view of him?

V.31 Jehoram was mad at Elijah.  Maybe he thought Elijah was responsible for the conditions in Samaria. At least, having demonstrated divine power, Jehoram wondered why Elisha would not put a stop to the horrible circumstances.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

6:23  One might have thought that slaying the Syrian captives would have removed the threat of Syrian invasion but no. It was the mercy of the king in letting them go that caused the Syrians to not come against Israel. A soft answer turneth away wrath – Prov 15:1 - so said the wise man.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

David Simpson had some interesting 2004 comments re the resurrection.

 2Kin 6:2 - "beam" [Heb. "qorah" (6982) means "beam, rafter", etc.] is used with the implication rafters/beams will be used to build a dwelling place - the same word "beam" (6982) is used in V.5 which suggests a tree.

2Kin 6:4-7 - V4 mentions cutting down "wood" [Heb. "ets" (6086) means "wood, stick, tree, gallows", etc.] and V6 mentions a "stick" using the same Heb. word "ets" (6086) perhaps suggesting the cross which made the "borrowed iron axhead" (time in one's life is borrowed from God); V6 "swim" [Heb. "tsuph" (6687) means "float, swim"]. We have metal sinking in water (the burial of life?) and wood (the cross, Christ's sacrifice?) is thrown in by "Eisha" (a possible echo of Christ) and the metal rises to the surface to be lifted out (resurrection?) of the grave.

2Kin 6:13 - "Dothan" (1886) means "two wells" - could this echo the saving Word/living water of God for Israel and for Judah, or the saving Word/living water of God for Jews and for Gentiles?

 2Kin 6:17,18,20 - the servant's eyes had been blind and were opened then the Gentiles eyes were blinded and V.20 become opened. 2Kin 6:21-22 - both Jew and Gentile (perhaps an echo of being in captivity to sin and death) are spared/saved.

2Kin 6:23 - a great feast is prepared with eating and drinking (echo of the memorial feast?). 2Kin 6:25 - could this echo a spiritual famine in Israel? 2Kin 6:27  - "barnfloor" [Heb. "goren" (1637) means "threshing floor" - perhaps suggesting bread?] and mention of a "winepress" (echo of the memorial feast?).

2Kin 6:29 - we have the son eaten but a son also lives on (is this an echo of  "Take, eat: this is my body...as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come" - 1Cor 11:24,26 - ?) not unlike Christ who escaped from death.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
Reading 2 - Lamentations 2
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Lamentations 2 online in the King James Version
Listen to Lamentations 2 online in the New International Version

 

v.6 - It is the ultimate dishonour that within the fold, God should despise the king and the priest. This is what we are taught to aspire to be in the ultimate honour of the establishment of the kingdom. To be kings and priests - which represents the Melchizedek priesthood, to which Christ belonged and to which we hope to belong, is our promised reward. So here again, Israel have rejected salvation, through rejecting Christ, even before he was born.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.14 False, lying, prophets had always been a problem in Israel. Before the time of the Assyrian invasion Micah had warned of them. Micah 3:5 At the time of the Babylonian captivity they were still a problem. Jeremiah 5:31 6:13 14:13-14 23:11-27 Zephaniah 3:4 And even after being take captive Judah had not learnt. Lamentations 2:14 Ezekiel 13:3
Amidst the doom of captivity the prophet speaks of a time of restoration Jeremiah 29:14 And return to the theme even after the desolation of Jerusalem Lamentations 2:14

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.1-4 - We see in verses like this that the Lord God is angered by certain types of behaviour. We see these patterns of behaviour around us all the time. Let us be sure that we too are angered by them. There are things which we clearly should not tolerate.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

Again more links with Deuteronomy 28

her king … among the gentiles
Deuteronomy 28:36
Eyes do fail
Deuteronomy 28:32
Women eat their fruit
Deuteronomy 28:53

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
"My eyes fail from weeping, I am in torment within, my heart is poured out on the ground because my people are destroyed, because children and infants faint in the streets of the city." So Jeremiah wept for the destruction of his people and their life in that terrible time when the king of Babylon took the city of Jerusalem. Jeremiah wept for the people that had no hope and no future.
But in these last days there are still many people in the same situation as those Jeremiah wept for. Some have not heard the gospel message and have no hope for that reason. Others, like most of the people in Jerusalem, have heard it but have chosen to ignore it and to turn their backs on the only one who could give them any hope at all. Do we weep for those people - especially for those who once knew Christ, but have turned and rejected him? They have no hope and, like the people of Jerusalem, are staring death in the face unless they repent. Let us show the same compassion to them as Jeremiah showed to his people - warn them and weep for them.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
During the time of Manasseh (2 Kings 21) God said that he would 'stretch out a line over Jerusalem' (2 Kings 21:13). Now Jeremiah uses very similar language to speak of the judgements that the Babylonians had brought upon Judah (Lamentations 2:8)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
2:22  In saying 'my terrors round about' Jeremiah is reflecting on the changed name of  Pashur to Magormissabib.  Which, as can be seen from Jer 20:3 is what the changed name means.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

V.15 "the perfection of beauty." The quotation is from Psa 48 "beautiful for situation (lifted up, exulted Zech 14:10; , Psa 68:15-16) is mount Zion; the city of the great king." As always, God's enemies see only the present and fail to comprehend the vast changes to be wrought in the future; as guaranteed by God; such as the exaltation of mount Zion and Jerusalem in the Millenial Age. Isa 2:2-4;, Isa 24:23


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

Vs.20,21 As with the siege of Samaria, human behavior during the siege of Jerusalem was equally depraved.  Young and old slain, their bodies left to rot in the streets; priests and prophets slaughtered in the sanctuary; mothers eating their children.  

Like its destruction in 587 BC, Jerusalem's destruction in 70 AD was equally dire, when over one million Jews were slaughtered.  And so as we read Lamentations, we could be thinking about the final catastrophe which will occur in Jerusalem.  At that time, Jesus, and His saints, will intervene to save it (Zech 14:2). 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

Throughout this chapter Jeremiah recounts how God has punished Judah.  The Lord has brought these dreadful conditions onto His special people. They must realise that their sin has been in their religion. They must listen to God in the future.  But do they?

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

2:1  Zion is covered with a cloud in God’s anger. In the past there had been a cloud of glory when Solomon dedicated the very temple – 1Chron 5:14  - which was destroyed before Jeremiah’s eyes.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

 

V.14 The visions of the prophets were false and they did not warn the population against its sin.  The proverb rings true that without a (true) vision the people will die (Prov 29:18). 

We have the same responsibility to warn our brothers and sisters, whether individually or communally.  That is the role of a true watchman (Eze 33:1-6).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

2:8The line stretched over Zion that Jeremiah speaks of here is the fulfillment of what God said to Manasseh – 2Kin 21:13


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

2:9 ‘Her king and her princes are among the gentiles’ echoes Deut 28:36. Notice the precision of Jeremiah’s words. Whilst de 28 mentions ‘king’ Jeremiah adds ‘princes’ because not only was Zedekiah in captivity but other kings before him had been taken captive – notably Jehoiachin who was still alive in Babylon.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.1 His footstool (KJV) refers to the ark.  Yahweh was so angry that the temple had to be destroyed, along with its accoutrements. 

The ark, also, represents Christ.  But, because Jesus always pleased His Father, He was never destroyed (Matt 3:17).  True believers are part of Jesus, and as such, are part of the ark.  If they please Yahweh, by keeping His commandments, they too will never be destroyed (1Tim 6:12). 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

2:1 God had already spoken of Jerusalem as part of His footstool – Isa 66:1 so Jeremiah makes God’s comment in Isaiah more personal.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.6 The violent taking away of the tabernacle is likened to that of a garden.  All gardens and vineyards in the Ancient Near East were hedged, or had walls around them.  These hedges or walls were put there to protect the garden.  Once they were taken away it meant that the garden was vulnerable to being destroyed. The garden figure was used to show that when Jerusalem’s defences were taken away, the city was destroyed (Isa 5:5). See vs.7-9.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

2:2,3,4,5,6,8 Notice how Jeremiah recognises that all Jerusalem’s problems are of God.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - 1Corinthians  15
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to 1Corinthians 15 online in the King James Version
Listen to 1Corinthians 15 online in the New International Version

 

v.1-4 set out the importance of the discussion of the whole chapter, and show just how the concept of Jesus' resurrection, and therefore our consequent promise of resurrection, is central to their (and our) salvation. Paul goes to a lot of trouble to make this point before going on to discuss in great depth the principles and practices associated with the life to come.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.12 A fundamental problem is highlighted here. We might view it as a matter of fellowship. If one did not believe in the resurrection we would be inclined to withdraw from them. Notice that Paul's response has been to show that to disbelieve in the resurrection is irrational because it ignores eye witness evidence and unscriptural because it ignores the teaching of Scripture. The point being is that Paul expected those who held this view would respond to the evidence and change their position. It is only those who will not be taught who are to be shunned.
v.13 - 19 To further emphasise his point Paul develops the logical implications that flow from saying there is no resurrection.
We would benefit from realising that error can be combated effectively by developing the implications of that error. In this way the folly of error can be highlighted more easily than by trying to 'prove' that the other is wrong.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
15:5-8 The force of the eye witness evidence of the resurrection of Jesus should not be under-estimated. It forms the basis for the rest of the argument that the apostle develops.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:3 Paul says Jesus died 'for our sins according to the Scriptures' can we produce a list of Old Testament passages which specifically demonstrate that Jesus' death was to take away sin?
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
There is a wonderful description of our resurrection here in the seed which is sown (signifying death in the ground) and then grows into a plant or tree, which bears absolutely no resemblance to the seed that went under the ground! Paul says that so it will also be with us (v44). In v36-37 Paul says that it is necessary for our fleshly body to die, so that the spiritual body may grow instead of it. It is a mistake to think that the spiritual can grow of the flesh, or along side it (v50).

This verse links up very well with Luke 18v18, where the ruler asked Jesus what he could do to "inherit" eternal life. Paul says that this is impossible, because "flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God". It doesn't matter how good our flesh is. It doesn't matter if our flesh keeps all the commandments of God, or loves our neighbour as ourself. What is needed is to die to the flesh, and start again with the spirit (46-49). Paul says that we were born first of Adam, and therefore bore his image (or nature), but likewise we can be reborn in the image of Christ, by putting on his nature (v49). The advice of Jesus to the ruler was to give up everything he had, and come, follow him.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Rob
15:52 The sounding trumpet is the fulfilment of the jubilee Lev 25:9 which is the time when the captive will be freed Isa 61:1-3 from sin and death for ever.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

Christ's resurrection rests on the evidence of many eye witnesses, including Paul himself, and is the great fact preached as the groundwork of the Gospel: They who deny the resurrection in general, must deny Christ, and as the consequence of the latter will be, that the followers of Christ's preaching and faith are vain.(v.2


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

V.29 There are a couple of passages in this chapter which should be clarified. The expression baptized for the dead is believed by some groups to be an opportunity to ensure the salvation of those who have died by being baptized for them as a substitute.  This is a highly heretical error. 

All examples in the scripture of baptism are by individuals for the salvation of themselves and no one else.  Baptized for the dead is a reference to those believers who have died and who are now being replaced by new believers. 

Paul is saying that if the old believers are not going to rise from the dead, then what is the point of the new believers being baptized, because they are not going to be resurrected either.  But, of course, the thrust of Paul's thesis is that all baptized believers will surely be raised.

V.52 Then we read: and the dead shall be raised incorruptible.  This appears that the dead will emerge from the ground already in a immortal state.  But, that clause is followed by: and we shall be changed

The point of Paul's argument is that the chosen shall be raised and then changed to incorruptibility (Immortality). This is dependent upon acceptance at the judgement seat at which we must all stand (Rom 14:10). 

If we were automatically raised to immortality, then why would we need to appear at the judgement seat?


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

1Cor 15:15,19 - The disciples preached that God raised Christ from the dead. Paul noted that if they were wrong about Christ's resurrection then there is no hope for anyone to be resurrected (including themselves) and thus the remark that they are to be pitied as all these written accounts of the resurrection were authored by people not paid and in fact persecuted (often killed) for their beliefs. Incidentally, if Christ was not resurrected, why was an occupied tomb not produced?

V.33 - To avoid corruption we should do our best to surround ourselves with positive godly influences. With unprofitable influences a click away on the internet, movies, TV, and company that can divert us from serving God, etc. there is plenty of temptation to pick and choose in this age of information/communication.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

15:45 The contrast between Adam – ‘a living soul’ and Jesus ‘a life giving spirit’ is in the abilities of the person named. Adam could only confer on his children his own nature Genesis 5:3 whereas the risen Jesus can confer eternal life on his children.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
HOPE IN ACTION
 
Our future in Christ is secure. Nothing can shake the promise of resurrection to God's faithful people. Resurrection is a certainty - more sure than anything else we can have in this life. Our resurrections will also be a time of great reward when we will receive a new and immortal life - a life that has none of the problems and pains of the life we now live. Resurrection is an incredible hope.
 
It is because of the certainty and the awesomeness of the resurrection, that Paul says this at the end of the chapter: "Therefore, my dear brothers, stand firm. Let nothing move you. Always give yourselves fully to the work of the Lord, because you know that your labour in the Lord is not in vain." (1Cor 15:58)
 
Take a look at your own life. Do we stand firm in our faith? Do we always give ourselves fully to the work of the Lord? If either of those answers are "no," then it follows that either our faith in God's promises is lacking, or that we do not fully understand the implications of the resurrection.
 
This life is not worth the time and energy we give it. Let's focus on God's promises and the resurrection and always give ourselves fully to the work of the Lord

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Robert

15:54 The swallowing up of death in victory’ is a quotation from Isa 25:8.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
15:4 In spite of the watch, Christ came forth from the tomb. When the women left, the guard was placed there; the night came, and was followed by the Sabbath. All was quiet. The authorities had their watch, but there were other unseen guards. It is recorded by the Psalmist that the angel of the Lord encampeth around those that fear Him; how much more so around His own beloeved Son.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

 

V.2 Paul's statement is a poignant reminder that just believing the Gospel message is not sufficient for salvation. A faithful maintenance of life in Christ is required - or as Paul puts it elsewhere: ...if you continue in your faith, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel (Col 1:23).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

15:33 Do we really take this to heart ourselves? Or do we not take care about the company which we keep?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

15:2 If we ever needed to have proof that not believing in, or misunderstanding the resurrection left believers ‘without hope’ here we have it!


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

HELL - part 2 of 2 [lesson 10 of 20 gleaned from "Outline of Basic Bible Teachings" by Wes Booker (for part 1 see October 26, Acts 20]

II. Hell in the New Testament. Three words (Hades, Tartarus, Gehenna) are translated as "hell".

     A. HADES, like SHEOL, simply means "the grave".   1.) Compare the following parallels - 1Cor 15:55 and Hos 13:14; Matt 16:18 and Isa 38:10; Acts 2:27 and Psa 16:10    2.) Though all go to Hades, the hope of the righteous is to be redeemed through resurrection - Hos 13:14;Isa 26:19;Dan 12:2-3;1Thess 4:13-16;Phil 3:8-11;Psa 49:15 (see Psa 17:15;71:20).   3.) Jesus Christ will liberate the righteous of all ages from sheol or hades - John 5:25-29;11:25-26;6:38,40;1Cor 15:20-23;Rev 20:13

     B. TARTARUS = the pit. Tartaroo (derived from tartarus) occurs only once, in 2Pet 2:4 (compare with Num 16:29-32). It signifies to cast into Tartarus. This verse may refer to the destruction of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram in Num 16.

     C. GEHENNA = the valley of Hinnom. It is a Greek word which represents the Hebrew 'Ge-Hinnon' (the valley of Tophet), a contraction of 'Son of Hinnon'.   1.) It refers to a valley to the south of Jerusalem where the Israelites sacrificed their children to Molech in accordance with heathen practice - Josh 15:8;2Chron 33:6;Jer 7:30-31;32:35     2.) The valley was desecrated by Josiah in 2Kin 23:10   3.) After the practice of child sacrifice was stopped by Josiah, the valley was turned into a city dump. Fires were kept burning constantly to consume the rubbish and prevent pestilence. The carcases of animals and criminals crucified under Roman law were cast there as a further sign of shame. Worms were ever present, feeding on the carcases that escaped the fire. This valley, associated with the consummation of man's wickedness, becomes the appropriate symbol of divine judgment in the time of Christ. Gehenna is the only word that is translated "hell" with which fire is associated. It represents a judicial judgment to be rendered to the wicked - Mark 9:43-48;Matt 5:29-30   4.) The valley will be used in the latter days to receive the carcases of the unrepentant rebels against God - Isa 66:20-24;30:33;Jer 31:40


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

 

Vs.23-28 Paul provides a synopsis of events that will occur when the Lord Jesus returns to the earth.

When Jesus returns:

-He will set up His Kingdom and rule the earth from Jerusalem (Dan 2:44; Mic 4:2).

-He will put down those who oppose Him (Psa 2:9).

-Then a reign of peace and prosperity will ensue (Psa 72:16; Isa 11:1-9; Zech 8:4,5).

-Towards the end of the Kingdom age, a rebellion will occur that shall be quashed (Rev 7:10).

-A judgement will be made on those mortals who have lived during through the Kingdom period (Rev 20:11-13,15).

-Those accepted by the Lord will be immortalized and join the saints who were immortalized before the Kingdom age began.

-At this point Jesus will hand back the throne to His Father (v.24).

-Then the last enemy, death, will be destroyed (v.26).

-Then Jesus and the immortalized saints shall all be subject to God (v.28).

-Thus, the state of God-manifestation will be achieved for eternity.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

15:19  Whilst this statement might seem to contradict what we might think of a life as a believer it in reality is so. If Jesus did not rise then we have no hope and all our actions in trying to be like the Jesus of the Bible are pointless. In comparison to other en we put ourselves in a disadvantaged position. We seek the benefit of others rather than ourselves and are willing to suffer wrong. All of this is pointless if Christ did not rise. That is the point that Paul is making.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

THE BIGGEST NEED

What should we give people to take away from their time with us at church?

The trend that seems to be developing among many Christian groups is one that leads toward entertainment. Many groups provide the popular music, entertaining speakers, interactive programmes and drama. All of this is good because it encourages people to come along for the enjoyment, but if it is left at that, it doesn't necessarily fill the needs people have.

Some groups focus on the humanity of people and reach out to help with soup kitchens, fundraising ventures, collections for the needy, councilling and self-help classes. Again all of these are needed, but by themselves do not fill the greatest need we as humans have.

Some groups focus on Bible teaching, reading and study. They hold Bible classes, examine themes through the Scriptures, and learn the history and doctrines of the Bible. But again, the intellectual learning in itself will not fill the hole that God has put inside us.

Paul said, "For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was burried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures." (1Cor 15:3-4) We need hope! We need to know that we can be forgiven! We need to know that the price for our sins was paid and that death is no longer our master. We need to know God's love for us. This is all shown in this simple gospel message shared by Paul.

Let us make sure that in whatever way we use to help spread the gospel, we pass on the hope, the message of forgiveness and salvation that has been offered through Christ.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Robert