|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.3
- passing through the fire was a euphemism for child sacrifice [2Chr.
28:1-4] - an aspect of Baal worship which God particularly abhorred. This
seems to be the start of something of a run of this practice in Israel [2
Kings 17:17, 23:10] and is directly condemned in the law - Lev.18:21,
20:2. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.
1-9 Whilst Ahaz was plotting to save his own life the prophet Isaiah was speaking
words to encourage Ahaz to trust in Yahweh. What he said can be found in Isaiah
7 - 8. These chapters can be best understood against the background of this time in the historical record. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.7
- How often do we turn to the world for help when we are in trouble rather than
to God? Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 16:10
Isn't it odd that Ahaz sought to copy the Syrian altar even though he sought to
the Assyrians for support. Maybe he thought he should copy Syria's altar because
he was afraid of the Syrians. Maybe he thought that having their altar and, by
implication, their God, he would be allied with Syria. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| SELLING ETERNITY Ahaz had it said of him that "he did not do what was right in the eyes of the LORD his God." (2 Kings 16 v 2) What follows through the rest of the chapter, are examples from the reign of Ahaz, that show how he pushed God behind his back and effectively sold him to pursue his own ends. It began when Ahaz needed a friend to help him overcome the threat of the king of Aram. To buy the friendship, Ahaz took the silver and gold found in the temple of the LORD and gave it as a gift to the king of Assyria. Then Ahaz had a new altar made to replace the bronze altar that God had designed. The bronze altar was shoved to the side, out of the way. In his pride Ahaz pushed God aside, replacing him with what he thought was better. Finally he stripped away much of the glory of the temple, the bronze bulls, the Sabbath canopy, the royal entrance, the side panels and moveable basins - all to continue his friendship with the king of Assyria. Ahaz sold God for friendship, security and pride. Even today too many people sell their faith to buy relationships that are not based on God. Others give their spirituality away to secure their careers, or push God aside to make room for pleasure or entertainment. God can provide all our needs - not just for now, but eternally. The most precious things we have are eternal. Let's not sell them for pleasures that will not last. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| :5
This event is the basis on which Isaiah makes his promise (Isaiah
7:3-16) that Syria and Israel would cease to be a threat to Ahaz. It is always
valuable to relate the events in the historical books to the contemporary prophets
and vice versa. Such comparisons help to fill out our understanding of the record. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 16:1 Just a little point. From this record we have to conclude that Jotham was 19 years old when Ahaz was born to him see (2Kin 15:33, 16:1) so Ahaz was born before Jotham came to the throne. This sort of data can be calculated for may of the kings. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.5 Notwithstanding their great efforts and military preparations, they failed to take it and, being disappointed, raised the siege and returned home. Isa 7:1 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Ahaz, the evil king of Judah, "Took the silver and gold that was found in the house of the Lord", and sent it as a present to the king of Assyria, to hire him to fight against Judah's enemies. How little he regarded the things of the Lord! Ahaz also desecrated the holy Temple, with his import of an altar built to a pattern seen in Damascus. He even converted a part of the temple to become a place for the king of Assyria.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
| V.7 Ahaz had a complete lack of respect for Isaiah; in spite of the assurance given him by the prophet by two signs that the confederate kings would not prevail against him (Isa 7:14, Isa 8:4). He still sought assistance from Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria. He put aside what he had been told by the prophet of God to do that which he desired. Man's thinking for the most part has not changed, what a lesson for each one of us. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.2 Ahaz did not do right in the sight of God and his subsequent evil acts are catalogued. V.5 Yahweh prophesied, through Isaiah, that Rezin and Pekah would not overcome Ahaz in war (Isa 7:4-7). The sign that Ahaz was given contains duel prophecies (Isa 7:14-16). In the more immediate historical setting, we are told that before this child is old enough to reason morally, the two offending kings, Rezin and Pekah would be destroyed (Isa 7:16). The child, here, is Isaiah's son Shear-jashub (Isa 7:3). Pekah reigned 752-732 BC and then was assassinated (2Kin 15:27,30); Rezin died when Damascus was destroyed. Tilgath-pileser attacked both their kingdoms (Aram and Israel; and Damascus, which was destroyed in 732 BC). Both of these events occurred within 12 years of the prophecy's being given. In Judaism, one is considered to have reached moral understanding at 12 years of age. This complies with Isa 7:16 cf. Luke 2:42. The second reference, in Isaiah's prophecy, belongs to the future when Jesus will, ultimately, save His nation Israel (Isa 7:14; Matt 1:23). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:3 Whereas Ahaz’s sons were made to pass through the fire Ahaz should hav ebeen teaching them the law of God – Deut 6:7 – but as Ahaz was not learning from God but rather from the kings of Israel’s behaviour it was not surprising that he was teaching his sons error. We must guard to ensure that we are being instructed by God for if we are not then we will be unable to instruct our sons and daughters. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| As we read the account of Ahaz's reign, we feel that there is a strong exhortation for those of us who live in the affluent societies of the 21st. century. We would suggest that the great increase of worldly wealth and luxury during the reigns of Azariah and Jotham introduced a large number of corruptions, which, during the Ahaz's reign, and by the influence of Ahaz, brought forth the idolatrous practices which prevailed in all parts of his kingdom (2Chron 28:24). Let each one of us be aware of the potential dangers of wealth and of luxurious living. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
16:2-3 Ahaz, a son of David, is presented as using another as his role model – the kings of Israel. We need to watch carefully who is our role model. So often the things that those in the world do see so attractive. If we think we are not affected just think how easily we remember the catch phrases of those in the entertainment industry. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.11 Ahaz had Urijah (Uriah), the priest, build an altar, of Syrian design, on which to sacrifice to the gods of Syria. He also sacrificed to the same pagan gods on the altar of Yahweh (v.15). Ahaz was a wicked king, but, the attitude of Urijah was more disappointing. He complied with Ahaz rather than challenging him on the wrongness of his actions. As apprentice priests, of Christ, we have to challenge error when we see it, even in our own house (Rev 1:6; 5:10). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:1 The conjunction of the ‘seventieth year of Pekah’ with the beginning of the reign of Ahaz provides us with a fixed point which we can use when developing our own list of the kings of Israel and Judah. This detail helps us to see which king was reigning in Judah when certain kings were reigning in Israel. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 Ahaz means possessor. V.3 Scripture condemns Ahaz (Lev 18:21; 20:2). V.4 Ahaz is condemned again by scripture (Deut 12:2). We should remember, that if one rejects God’s Word, he/she shall be judged by that Word (John 12:48). V.9 Amos prophesied that the Arameans would be taken captive by the Assyrians and moved to Kir (Amos 1:5; 9:7). Kir was a region between the Black and Caspian Seas (present-day Armenia, Kurgistan, or Georgia). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:6 This ‘Rezin’ king of Syria is the ‘Rezin’ mentioned in Isa 7:1-8, 8:6, 9:11 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.3
- Here we have the 'high places' mentioned again. They are clearly not places
for the worship of God, though one assumes they started off with that intention,
which only makes it worse. This subject of destruction of these places of idol
worship stems from the curses [Lev.26:30]
and is the subject of some prophecy - here,
Isa.27:9 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
v.4 - 5 The promise that the dead one would be laid down before the idols was to demonstrate that the idols could not save. You might get the kids to look for other places where this sort of thing happens. For example the way that Dagon fell down before the ark of the covenant. v.8 The 'remnant' are those who sighed and cried for Jerusalem, in chapter 9. v.12 the pestilence and the sword catch the curses of Deuteronomy 28. v.13 And all the punishment is to show that Yahweh is the Lord. Again the kids might enjoy searching out other times when this sort of thing is said. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.7,10
- We know that God is the Lord when things go wrong in our lives too. God chastens
those He loves in an effort to encourage them to greater faith and patience and
humility - to bring to the fore those characteristics of which He approves. Let
us be sure to recognise His chastening hand and to respond by being exercised
by it. Heb
12:11 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| The fact that
Ezekiel, in the land of Babylon, is still warning of impending punishment upon
the land of Israel implies that there was communication between Israel and Babylon.
Also those who were in Babylon we still being warned that the captivity that they
were experiencing was only part of the story. The rest of the nation were going
to be punished also. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 6:14
So Israel were told that the land would be desolate as well as the fact that they
would be driven out of the land. Of course once they were out of the land they
would have no idea what the land was like. So God is concerned to let them know
that their sinfulness not only affected them but had an impact upon the land which
God had His eyes on all the year round (Deuteronomy
1:12) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 6:5 The scattered bones that Ezekiel speaks of here are the same bones which are 'the whole house of Israel (Eze 37:11) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.2 There is a close connection between the land and the people. In Lev 26 it is made plain that if the people were obedient, then the land would be blessed(v.4), whereas if the people were unfaithful to God the land would be made desolate(v.33). Judgement pronounced upon the land is an indication of the wicked state of the people in it. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.14 Yahweh promises that Israel will be laid waste from north to south. The town Diblah should read Riblah which is a northern Syrian town bordering Babylon. The Vulgate helps this understanding, and it was probably a copyist who made a mistake by putting D instead than R. And so the expression the wilderness toward Riblath literally means from the wilderness in the south to the border of Babylon in the north. It is equivalent to the saying, in the time of Judges and Samuel, which described the extent of Israel as from Dan even to Beersheba (Judg 20:1). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Israel sinned against God in the matter of their religion, Eze 6:3-7. They made idols and images. They worshipped false gods. In the sense that God was their husband, and Israel was the bride, they committed adultery, see Isa 54:5, and Jer 2:14). That was why the Lord was punishing them. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
6:7 Amidst all the words of warning about judgment we learn the reason for it all. God was concerned that Israel would recognise that He was Yahweh – their God. This was their problem. They would not recognise Him in their lives but He was concerned that they might worship Him so that they might be blessed. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
6:3 ‘I will destroy your high places’ utilises the punishment that God said would come – Lev 26:30 – if Israel were faithless. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
Vs.2,3 The expression the mountains of Israel refers to the Judean Mountains. Jerusalem is situated there at an elevation of 2600 ft. above sea level. Ezekiel later prophesies that at the end times Israel will be living peacefully on the mountains of Israel (38:8). The West Bank region is in the mountains of Israel, presently occupied by the Palestinians. Does that mean that the Palestinians will be displaced (or integrated)? This is something to watch for as we see events unfolding. We do know that the confederacy of Gog will invade a peaceful Israel but will be destroyed on the mountains of Israel by the Lord Jesus (39:2-4). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
6:5 Laying ‘the dead carcases of the children of Israel before their idols’ is a fulfilment of Lev 26:30. The repeated use of the curses of Leviticus 26 should have alerted Israel to the fact that they were sinful and had chosen the curses that would come upon them if they were unfaithful. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.5 Often found on tombstones, in the west, is the expression: Rest in Peace (R.I.P.). In the ancient Near East, however, conquering armies were not so considerate of their enemy's dead. The final insult, to the vanquished foe, was to break open their sepulchres and scatter the bones of the deceased on the ground. Yahweh promised this treatment for His people because of their idolatry. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
6:11-12 The ‘sword’ ‘famine’ an ‘pestilence’ catches what Ezekiel has already spoken – 5:12. So Ezekiel continues with the same warning against Israel. The objective? Not simply to warn them that they will be punished but rather to encourage them to repentance Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.8 Yahweh has, and always will, keep a remnant of His people because they bear witness to His being (Isa 44:8). V.13 This pagan practice of worship amongst the trees continued right up to the modern era. In fact, the Christmas tree is an offshoot (literally) of this practice. More will be said in December on this matter. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Notice the emphasis: "in every high hill, on all the mountaintops, under every green tree, and under every thick oak" (v13). Idolatry had completely permeated society. It's worth noticing that God would not have brought this terrible judgement on Israel and Judah if there was significant good left in it. That's not the way God works (see for example Gen 18:20-33). So we're being told here that idolatry had spread everywhere, like a cancer that couldn't be chopped out any more. God's comment on it is simply: "there was no remedy" (2Chron 36:14-21). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
6:4 The breaking of Israel’s ‘images’ is a fulfilment of Lev 26:30 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.46
- 'after three days'. Although this must have been a dreadful time for his parents,
here we have a type of the death and resurrection to take place some years later.
Jesus was gone for 3 days - possibly presumed dead. The joy of his resurrection
can perhaps be better appreciated by our finite minds if we consider the joy of
receiving back a child we thought was gone. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2:8
Shepherds abiding see
Micah 4:8 A point worth
thinking about on this one is that Luke presents a number of events which are
designed to show that the revelation of God is not to the mighty. On this occasion,
when the high priest and all the priests are busying themselves about the Passover
the Lord reveals His purpose to 'mere' farmers. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 2:25
Simeon was 'waiting for the consolation of Israel' Joseph of Arimathea was 'waiting
for the kingdom of God' (Luke
23:51). A little detail to which we can add John
12:42 'Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed
'. A confirmation
that there were many who realised that the time period of Daniel was fulfilled
and Messiah should come. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :19
In keeping 'all those things and' pondering Mary is behaving like Jacob (Genesis
37:11) reflected upon the words of the child Joseph. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Some questions
to ponder:
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| 2:14 What prompted the angels to praise God? I suggested, that as angels are not all knowing (1Pet 1:12), they, on hearing the announcement, realised the significance of the birth of Jesus as part of the redemptive plan. Their praise was a consequence of their growing understanding of God's redemptive plan. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.39 This was the village of which Nathaniel said "Out of Nazareth can any good come" John 1:46 Yet, it was here that Jesus grew up. It was here that he spent much of his life. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| V.52 - Jesus grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and men. We have an Old Testament passage seemingly refering to this learning/growth process in Isa 7:14-15. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
V.1 Caesar Augustus was originally Caius Julius Caesar Octavianus, the grand-nephew of Julius Caesar. When Augustus' father died, he was adopted by Julius Caesar. Augustus was simply a title meaning reverend one which was given to Octavianus by the Roman senate. V.14 Every Christmas the apostate churches go gaga over the birth of Christ with their crčche displays of the nativity scene. They love to cite and sing about this verse without understanding its meaning. They naďvely believe that somehow this baby has brought peace to the world. The Lord, himself, denies this: Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. (Matt 10:34 NIV). Much bloodshed has been wrought over the centuries, in the name of Jesus, by the apostasy. The Lord will ultimately bring peace when he returns, puts down His enemies, and reigns in His kingdom (Isa 9:6,7; 1Cor 15:25,26). However, most churches deny the scripture because they do not believe in the kingdom on earth, but rather have given themselves over to the pagan notion of immortal souls. A corner stone of the true Gospel is the kingdom (Acts 8:12), and true believers should hold on tenaciously to its hope. Therefore, true believers should never engage in any pagan rituals associated with Christmas, as their significance runs counter to the tenets of the Truth. More will be said on this topic in December. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
2:7 Various pieces of language used around the time of Jesus' birth are also used around the time of his death. wrapped him Matt 27:59 laid him Luke 23:53 inn Luke 22:11 guestchamber - same word Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 4-5 Jesus said What is due to Caesar render to Caesar, and what is due to God render to God (Luke 20:25). Mary in these two verses had not delivered Jesus, yet he was being obeyed by both Joseph and Mary. There was never a thought in their mind of refusing to obey the emperor in a manner that was not contrary to the will of God. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
2:46 The way that Jesus is seen amazing the doctors of the law is a demonstration of the truth of Psa 119:100 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.8 indicates that the time of year was spring (lambing season, Feb./Mar.). That is the reason the shepherds were in the field at night, protecting their flock. This refutes the nonsense that Dec. 25th. (The pagan Roman feast day of Saturnalia) was the birth date of Jesus. V.42 Twelve was the age of moral understanding in Judaism (see my note on today's 2 Kings 16 reading). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
2:14 The angels saying ‘Glory to God in the highest’ is echoed by the common people – Luke 19:38 – at the time of Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2:9-10 We have already seen in verse 7 similar language to that which is fund around the time of the crucifixion of Jesus. Here are some more similarities in this verse.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
- Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
- Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
V.4 It is not likely that Mary and Joseph were in Bethlehem very long before Jesus was born. After the birth, Mary would have had to perform her days of purification according to the Law. The sequence would have run: -eight days after birth, Jesus was circumcised (v.21 cf. Lev 12:3). -Mary had thirty-three days of purification (v.22 cf. Lev 12:4). After the days of purification, a burnt offering had to be made at the tabernacle (Lev 12:6-8). In the case of Mary, that meant at the temple in Jerusalem (v.22). Note that her offering of two birds, rather than a lamb, signified her state of poverty. And so, from the time of Jesus' birth to the time of the departure to Jerusalem was 41 days. During that time, Jesus was visited by the shepherds (vs.15,16) and the wise men (after Herod tried to recruit them for the young child's destruction) (Matt 2:1-9). Herod's attempts to kill Jesus, of course, were thwarted (Matt 2:12). V.25 The consolation of Israel is a phrase that meant the redemption of Israel through its Messiah, which was long awaited by pious Jews. Simeon is derived from the Hebrew word shama which means hear. The message about the Messiah had been heard and understood (vs.30-32). V.36 Anna is a contraction of Hannah which means grace. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
2:30 In recognising that he had ‘seen thy salvation’ Simeon, echoing Isa 52:10, is speaking of the fulfilment of Scripture. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||