|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.4
- Nehushtan = 'of copper; a brazen thing'
It was a name of contempt given to the actual serpent Moses had made in the wilderness
Nu
21:8 and which Hezekiah now destroyed because the children of Israel began
to regard it as an idol and "burn incense to it." The lapse of nearly one thousand
years had invested the "brazen serpent" with a mysterious sanctity; and in order
to impress upon the people its worthlessness, Hezekiah called it, in contempt,
"Nehushtan," a brazen thing, a mere piece of brass. There is a big lesson for
us here. As human being we also have this desire to invest actual objects with
sanctity. Would you throw away something as precious as that in order to stop
it from being a temptation to you?I'm sure I would say 'You can't throw that away,
it is part of our heritage ... etc. etc.", but Hezekiah here was a man of
purpose for God. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.21
The phrase 'daughter of Jerusalem' (2
Kings 19:21 Isaiah 37:22 Lamentations 2:13,15 Micah 4:8 Zephaniah 3:14 Zechariah
9:9) is a phrase used almost exclusively in the context of deliverance from
the enemy. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.21
The concept of Egypt as a bruised or broken reed also occurs in Isa.36:6,
Eze.29:6,7. How, if at all, does this relate to the work of Jesus as described
prophetically in Isa.42:3,
where the same Hebrew words (07533, 07070)
are used? Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 18:14-16
Hezekiah, though he was a 'good' king (18:3)
he buckled temporarily under the threat of the Assyrian. We can take courage that
even Hezekiah faltered in his faith. Nevertheless, as we will learn in future
chapters, he recovered from his lack of faith. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :4
Mention of the 'brazen serpent' which Moses had made in the wilderness (Numbers
21:8) is the only indication in time that Israel had kept the serpent. But
by now it had become an item of adoration - but in reality it was a relic which
should have reminded Israel that their fathers had sinned in the wilderness and
had it not been for God's compassion there would have been no deliverance. So
they ere not remembering the sins nor the God that had delivered them! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 18:6 'clave' to the Lord <01692> is the same word found in Gen 2:24 when speaking of the commitment a man must make to his wife. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.15 To meet the demands of Sennacherib the temple was again raided. Silver was taken from the treasuriers and gold stripped from the doors and pillars (V.16) to be given to the king of Assyria. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Samaria was taken by the Assyrians in Hezekiah's 7th year (2Kin 18:9,10). Just 7 years later the Assyrians came against Jerusalem (2Kin 18:13), so Hezekiah must have been terribly afraid. Was Jerusalem and his kingdom going to be deported next? It's a sad reflection that he thought money could buy his release. In 2Chron 29:3 Hezekiah had opened and repaired the temple doors, in his first year. Then, in his 14th year, he cut off the gold from the temple doors, and even from the pillars which he himself had given to the Lord, and gave that to the king of Assyria (2Kin 18:16). David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
| As we read this section of scripture, we can only marvel at the longsuffering of God in permitting Israel to remain for so long, troughout their history shines out the mercy of their Heavenly Father towards His wayward children. How richly blessed we are to have such a merciful God; who has provided a means for us to become heirs of the promises made to Abraham. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
In 721 BC Samaria fell and Israel was scattered. That same year, Shalmaneser died and was succeeded by Sargon II (722-705 BC). He campaigned in Gaza in 720 BC and Ashdod in 712 BC. Sargon died in battle and was succeeded by Sennacherib (704-681 BC). Vs.2,7,8 Hezekiah (726-697 BC) began his reign at twenty-five years old. He refused to knuckle under Shalmaneser or Sargon and even boldly campaigned against the Philistines himself, but not in alliance with Sargon. Hezekiah anticipated a future confrontation with the Assyrians and fortified Jerusalem. He also constructed a tunnel from the Gihon spring to the Pool of Siloam to ensure an adequate water supply. Vs.14-16 However, when Sennacherib started to threaten, Hezekiah did not show the same faith or boldness that he did against the previous Assyrian rulers and tried to buy his way out of trouble. Sennacherib was not buying it, and sent his lieutenant Rabshekeh to taunt, to threaten, and to persuade Hezekiah to yield. And so, the test of faith was underway. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
18:13 The way in which the Assyrians took the fenced cities of Judah but not Jerusalem matches what had happened in the days of Rehoboam – 2Chron 12:4-6 . Maybe the way Rehoboam humbled himself acted as a stimulus to the people in the days of Hezekiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.17 The king of Assyria sent three individuals to meet Hezekiah. In the KJV these three are named Tartan, Rabsaris, and Rabshakeh. They are not proper names but titles. Tartan was the title for the highest ranking officer in the Assyrian army - the commander-in-chief. Rabsaris was the right-hand spokesman for the king (ambassador). By the way, saris means eunuch in Akkadian, but that is not necessarily meant literally. However, subservience is implied. Rabshakeh literally means cup-bearer, but the original duty had expanded to that of a commander in the field. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
18:19-24 The Assyrian truly highlighted the issue with his repeated use of ‘trust’ in his speech. But this was also the challenge against the God of Israel. Hezekiah, of course, trusted the God of Israel who was the only God. That God was the only god was the point that the king of Assyria did not grasp. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
A BAD YEAR
It was in the fourteenth year of Hezekiah's reign as king of Judah that "Senacherib king of Assyria attacked all the fortified cities of Judah and captured them." (2Kin 18:13)
As a king, to have cities in your kingdom captured and destroyed must be one of the most devastating things that could happen. It strikes at the morale of the army, the whole kingdom, and the defeat lies heavily on the conscience and heart of the king. Defeat in one place sets the king and his army up for defeat in more places.
We also learn that Hezekiah reigned in Jerusalem for 29 years. Skipping a few chapters on to the time of Hezekiah's sickness when he almost died, we learn that at that time, God added fifteen years to his life. A little bit of maths, talking 15 from 29, tells us that Hezekiah's illness also took place in his fourteenth year. So it seems that almost all we know about Hezekiah happened in his fourteenth year. It was the year his kingdom and kingship were attacked, and also the year he got so sick he almost died.
Yet it was in the fourteenth year of Hezekiah, in the midst of all those trials, that he showed an amazing strength of faith.
Bad times, maybe even bad years, or decades, will happen to us. When they come let's be like Hezekiah and use the trials to show an amazing faith. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
|
Vs.22,25 In Assyrian eyes, the God of Israel was just another national god. National gods of other lands had not deterred the Assyrians from invading and conquering those lands. So why should the invasion and the conquering Israel be any different? So arrogantly confident was Rabshakeh about Assyrian success that he derided the power of Israel's God. He claimed that Hezekiah had made God impotent by removing His high places and altars. Moreover, he presumptuously claimed that God, himself, had told him to attack Judah. Yahweh, the living God of Israel, was not amused. Later, the Assyrians would understand that: It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God (Heb 10:31). Nehustan is a derogatory Hebrew term meaning an insignificant piece of bronze. About 700 years previous, Moses was commanded to make a bronze snake and put it on a pole. This was done to save the Israelites from snakebite (Num 21:8,9). It portended the saving power of the Lord Jesus, over death, when He was lifted up on the cross. However, since the time of Moses, Israel had used the relic of the bronze snake as an idolatrous object of worship.Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
18:1 When Hezekiah came to the throne we are six hears away from the beginning of the siege of Samaria. The Assyrian threat loomed large in the early years of Hezekiah’s reign. He saw trusting in God as the solution to the Assyrian threat and began his preparations very early in his life. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.25 Samaria had fallen; Israel had been taken captive and scattered by the Assyrians. Judah and Jerusalem were now being menaced. However, this threat would be averted. The people of Judah would have the experience of Israel, and their own near tragedy to consider. Moreover, they knew that the prophets of Israel had been warning the northern kingdom for years about their impending doom. However, the lesson of Israel, and Hezekiah's close call, ultimately had no lasting impact on Judah. Despite the warnings of the prophets, Judah would be overrun and Jerusalem would fall, 136 years after the fall of Samaria, in 586 BC. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
18:33 the disdainful ‘Where are the gods’ echoes the vile question of Pharaoh – Exo 5:3 – the same fate awaited the king of Assyria as that the king of Egypt suffered – humiliation before the king of the whole earth. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 Hezekiah (726-697BC) means Yah has strengthened or strength of Yah. V.4 The copper serpent had seen functional service in the wilderness. But, since that time it had become an idolatrous object of worship (Num 21:5-10). We must be careful not let traditional things of Christadelphia become larger than life, or take on meanings that were not originally meant. V.7 Ahaz, Hezekiah’s father, had become subject to an annual tribute to Assyria. It must have taken a great deal of faith and trust in Yahweh to make so bold a move. V.8 The expression: from the tower of the watchmen to the fenced city (KJV) seems to be proverbial and not indicative of geographical points, because the same expression is found elsewhere (2Kin 17:3). V.9 Shalmaneser IV succeeded Tiglath-pileser to the throne in 727 BC. He began the three-year siege of Samaria, but did not see it completed. The siege was finished by Sargon. During the interim, Shalmaneser retired to Nineveh where he died. V.10 This occurred in 721 BC. V.13 Sennacherib (704-682 BC) was the son of Sargon. Sennacherib came up against Judah in his third year, 701 BC. This could not have been in Hezekiah’s fourteenth year. Hezekiah’s fourteenth year was 712 BC, and Sennacherib came to power only in 704 BC. And so, the fourteenth year must be a copyist’s error. The text should read: ... the twenty-seventh year of Hezekiah’s reign. V.14 The Assyrian account of the same event contains an greater amount of gold and silver. But, the chronicles of Ancient Near East kingdoms often exaggerated such things to boost national pride. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
18:15 The taking of the fenced cities of Judah is the background to Isa 8:7-8 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2Kin 18:3-6 - Hezekiah is considered by some a type of Christ; Hezekiah's sweeping reforms perhaps echo the work of Christ at his first advent (Col 2:13-15). 2Kin 18:4 - "brasen serpent" - in Moses' day it was on a pole (Num 21:8-9;John 3:14-15) and thus was a type of the flesh crucified but in this instance there is no reference to the pole so perhaps it is symbolic of the flesh uncrucified that was being wrongly worshipped. 2Kin 18:9 - "Shalmaneser" [(8022) means "fire-worshipper"]. 2Kin 18:13,17,29,36 - Hezekiah is considered by some a type of Christ; the invasion of Sennacherib and the threats perhaps echo the opposition Christ received though he didn't answer back (Acts 4:26-27;Mark 15:5). 2Kin 18:17 - "fullers" [Heb. "kabas" (3526) means "to wash, to trample, to wash by treading, to be washed"]. A tunnel diverted water from the Spring of Gihon into a pool within the city walls (2Chron 32:1-4). 2Kin 18:18 - "Eliakim" [(471) means "God raises, God sets up, God establishes, God of raising"]; Eliakim is thought by some to be a type of Christ (Isa 22:20-25); [2Kin 18:37 - (Eliakim was) "...over the household..."]. 2Kin 18:31 - having one's own vine and fig tree is perhaps an echo of a return to the land and the millenial day of rest (Mic 4:4). 2Kin 18:32 - "...The LORD will deliver us"; "bread"; "wine" [Heb. "tiyrosh" (8492) means "new wine, freshly pressed wine"]. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.1
- It would seem that (like in ch.20:1),
these elders had come to enquire of the Lord. I must admit to a personal assumption
that the prophets were alone with God when they received their revelations, but
this makes it clear that that was not the case, at least not always. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.12
- Let us be sure not to fall into this thinking. God sees all that we do. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| This chapter contains
part of a vision that Ezekiel received. The vision runs from 8:1-11:24.
But consider the circumstances. The elders of Israel, who were captive in Babylon,
have to come to see what God has to say to them - but their hearts are far from
God. So Ezekiel is given a powerful condemnation of those in Jerusalem. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 8:15
There is a beautiful contrast between 'hast thou seen this' here and the wonderful
vision that Ezekiel was called to see (47:6)
later. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 8:18 When Ezekiel was told that God would not hear the prayers of the people this echoes what God had told Jeremiah (7:16) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.4 The Shekinah cloud of God's glory, at this point still remains in the temple, like that which Ezeiel saw "in the plain" (Eze 3:22-23); not until Eze 10:4 ;18 did it leave the temple at Jerusalem. The glory then left Jerusalem and stood on the Mount of Olives. Eze 11:23 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.14 One of the abominations that Ezekiel saw was women weeping for Tammuz. According to the pagan beliefs of fertility cults, Tammuz was betrayed by his lover Ishtar (the same as Astarte, the Queen of Heaven), and thus died each fall. The decaying vegetation at the fall of the year was testimony to this event, and thus a cause of mourning. Interestingly, during their stay in Babylon, the Jews adopted some Babylonian months into their calendar which remained after the exile. One month was Tammuz (June/July), a time of lush vegetation and summer fruit. This is in keeping with the annual revival of Tammuz, only to suffer death once more in the fall. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
V.16 - with their backs turned toward the temple of the Lord they had symbolically turned away from God Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
Today’s prophecy was given to Ezekiel a year and a month after the previous ones (see Eze 1:1,2 and Eze 8:8). It’s interesting to note that the elders of Judah were in Ezekiel’s presence, probably hoping he would have a message for them. He did. God brought him in vision to Jerusalem, and showed him four different horrors which were done in Jerusalem, all recorded in today’s chapter. These series of visions then go on until Eze 11:24,25.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
8:1 The ‘elders’ who went to listen to Ezekiel might well have been the same elders who were spoken to by Jeremiah – Jer 19:1 - If so they had heard about the judgment that would come and yet they were still rebelling against God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
8:4 There are a number of times that Ezekiel sees the ‘glory of God’ throughout his prophecy. Thus it was important that he had the detailed revelation in chapter 1. The vision in chapter 1 was not to provide us with an area of Scripture that we can debate. Rather it was to prepare Ezekiel for the visions that were to follow. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| In this chapter we begin a new section of Ezekiel's prophecies, up to this point we have read of the visions that Ezeliel received dealing with both Judah and Israel. The visions in this chapter and the next three refer to Jerusalem and the remnant of Judah under Zedekiah, as distinguished fron the Babylonian exiles. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
V.3 The image (idol) that provokes to jealousy is not defined, but is probably Asherah (Astarte). Manasseh had set one up in the temple (2Kin 21:7). Subsequently, Josiah destroyed it (2Kin 23:6). This present idol could be a replacement for the one Josiah destroyed. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
8:11The word ‘ancients’ is the same word translated ‘elders’ in verse 1. Whilst the ‘elders’ are sitting before Ezekiel in Babylon he sees what their counterparts are actually doing in Jerusalem. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.3 Ahaz had removed Yahweh's altar and placed it north of the Syrian altar that he had made (2Kin 16:14). The idol, an Asherah pole, had been placed closeby. This pole was, in all likelihood, a successor to the one that Josiah had destroyed. V.11 Shaphan was the priest who read the newly-discovered book of the Law to Josiah. It is ironic, then, that Shaphan's son, Jaazaniah, was one of the idolaters. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
8:12 The myth that ‘the Lord seeth not’, echoed again in Eze 9:9 we may never actually say those words but from time to time our behaviour indicates that it is what we think. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 Here, Ezekiel begins a prophecy that continues into the next four chapters. V.2 This is the same man that Ezekiel describes in Eze 1:27. V.3 We are not told what exactly the image (idol) of jealousy was. V.10 The phrase creeping things refers to the gods that the Egyptians worshipped. Yahweh’s plagues in Egypt countered some of those gods. V.11 Seventy men (elders), as a pattern of leadership, started with Moses (Num 11:16). Shaphan had been the scribe who brought and read the Book of the Law to Josiah (2Kin 22:10-14). Jaazaniah, the son of Shaphan had shown total disregard for the Book of the Law. He had become the leader of a group of spiritual rebels. V.16 Sun worship originated in Persia. This event was particularly abominable because it took place in the inner court of the temple. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
If you were trying to describe to a child the depths of the heart of an adult, where love was kept, and hatred nurtured, where ideas sprang forth and the deepest secrets guarded; how would you begin to put it into words? And if not words, what picture would you use? God rose to this challenge by giving Solomon the pattern of the temple, so that men and women could visualise how one ought to keep God set apart, holy, in each ones heart and mind. So when God had to explain to Ezekiel what was wrong with Israel and Judah, he used that same temple image. This was an image, or reflection, of what went on in the heart of the nation of Israel. It was the fact that God had been replaced in the hearts and minds of the people that made God so angry and hurt. For us gentiles who have no temple this is easy to understand. But to them it was almost impossible to seperate the image (temple) from the true (the heart and mind). So Jesus proposed pulling down that temple so that finally people would understand how to worship his Father in spirit and in truth (John 2:13-21, 4:22-24, Isa 56:7, Heb 13:10-15) Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
8:3 Imagine the scene. The elders are sitting before Ezekiel and all of a sudden he goes into a trance. They sit amazed as he does not communicate anything to them. Then, eventually, he speaks – Eze 11:25 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.9-10
Obviously these temptations are recorded that we might use them example of Jesus
when answering to our own lusts and desires, as he was tempted in all points like
as we are. Here is by far the most serious type of temptation - the one where
we seem to be scripturally justified in what we do and therefore go forward with
great entusiasm straight into danger, because we have not first stepped back to
consider whether we have discerned scripture aright. The result, if we listen
to the voice of sin, it that in all sincerity, we believe we are doing right and
yet are living contrary to God's will. We must remove these kind of blinkers,
but before we can, we must see them there in the first place. It is a very hard
thing and calls for much prayer. Jesus overcame. There are many rewards, beyond
our wildest thoughts offered to those who overcome. Let us be among them. Let
us pray that God will help us to see our 'secret faults'.
2Cor.11:14, Psa.19:12 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 4:1
Being 'led by the spirit' is echoed in Romans
8:14 and Galatians 5:18. Jesus was instructed by the Word and so was able
to resist the temptations. In this he is our example. Our walking in the spirit
matches his, or it should. This is how we overcome. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :9
The temptation to cast himself down, which he resisted, raises it's head again
(4:29)
when the leaders wanted to cast him off the brow of the hill. Jesus could have
allowed this to show his position but did not. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| After Jesus spoke
"gracious" words unto the people of Nazareth, so that they marvelled
at him, they said "is not this Joseph's son?". They couldn't have been
more wrong. This mistaken identity caused them to try to kill him. Somehow they
didn't recognise him for what he was. Why was this, when it was so plain to the
demons? (v34,
41). Is it possible, that we also do not recognise the "gracious words"
of Jesus, when spoken to us by our brothers and sisters? Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| 4:22 The 'gracious words' from Jesus' 'mouth' echoes the language of Psa 45:2 where the king is spoken of. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.13 Not for a moment did Jesus leave the path of trust and obedience. He persevered in carring out the work which the Father had given him to do. For us also, the lesson is "Trust and obey".. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.43 It is important to note that the public preaching proclamation of Jesus was that of the Kingdom of God (Acts 1:3). The Kingdom is the hope of all true Christians, promised to those who love and obey the Lord (James 2:5). This kingdom, which will be a real kingdom on earth, has been promised of old (Dan 2:44). The faithful throughout the ages shall inherit it (Luke 13:28,29). Jesus will return to earth to take possession of His kingdom (Luke 1:32,33; Acts 1:11). The Gospel contains two parts: the things concerning the Kingdom of God and the Name of Jesus Christ (Acts 8:12). One must believe both parts to be a true follower of Christ. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
4:33 The healing of the man with the unclean spirit' is the first miracle that Luke records that Jesus performed. The man typifies Israel in their sinful state. Just as the man was healed Jesus will heal the nation. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| What was Jesus doing during this 40 day period? He had no daily work to perform, we are told that he did not eat, hence he would not have had to look for, or prepare any food; he was no longer a carpenter of Nazareth; he would not have had others with him. He was in the wilderness without any companions. For almost six weeks he was free to wonder in the wilderness, or free to rest. It is not unreasonable to suggest that his only activity would have been reflection on the Word of God, and to be in prayer to his Father. The Word would not have been in book form as we have it, but only in his heart and mind. Both his Heart and mind were filled with the Word of God. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
4:10 The use of Psa 91:11 by the tempter – a Psalm which spoke of God’s care for Joshua and Caleb in the wilderness journey – shows the deceitfulness of sin. We can often find Scripture to support wrong actions. The antidote is to seek the whole counsel of God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
V.2 After being physically and mentally weakened by forty days of fasting, Jesus was ready to be tested. He became embroiled in a great internal conflict. Like any human being, He struggled with obeying God while, at the same time, being tempted by His own desires (Heb 4:15). Jesus refuted every temptation by countermanding it with the Word of God. Thus, He successfully overcame His trial. The lesson for us is to let the Word of God guide us in our lives. But, that cannot be done if we do not know what the Word says. And so, let's make its reading a habit. Remember, Jesus did not have a Bible in His hand when He was tempted - He knew the Word by heart. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
4:23 In saying “whatsoever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in thy country” we learn that whilst Luke presents this event as following on immediately after the temptations in the wilderness it was not the next event in Jesus’ life. He had been preaching in Capernaum and healing. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
4:23 In saying “whatsoever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in thy country” we learn that whilst Luke presents this event as following on immediately after the temptations in the wilderness it was not the next event in Jesus’ life. He had been preaching in Capernaum and healing. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.5,9 We have just read how Ezekiel was transported, in the spirit, to Jerusalem (Eze 8:3). As part of His temptation, Jesus was similarly transported, in vision, to see the kingdoms of the world; and the temple in Jerusalem. Jesus knew He had unlimited power, and could indulge any whim (John 3:34). However, He chose to resist any temptation with the use of scripture (He used Deuteronomy). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
4:25-27 Here, so early on in the ministry of Jesus, we see an indication that the gospel was to be taken to the gentiles. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.21 This verse proves that Jesus, and His activities, were prophesied in the Old Testament. And so, any follower of Jesus must understand the Old Testament (Luke 24:44). V.28 Although true according to scripture, any allusion to the Gentiles was not welcomed by the Jews. V.30 A miracle was performed whereby Jesus could pass through the hostile crowd. V.31 Capernaum became the residence, and center of operations, of Jesus. V.32 the word power (KJV) is better translated authority (ESV). V.43 It should be clearly noted that Jesus preached the kingdom of God. One cannot be a true follower of Jesus without understanding and believing the kingdom of God (on earth). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
4:44 In saying that Jesus ‘preached in the synagogues of Galilee’ we learn something of the way that Jesus became known. Everyone would go to the synagogue every sabbath and so he would get a high exposure providing a speedy basis for making himself known to the people. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||