|
||||||||||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.7
- It is surprising how God chooses to use signs like this rather than heal by
the direct action of his power. Here are other examples of when prophets used
a natural substance when it was clearly God who brought about a miraculous healing
- 2Kings
2:20-22, 4:41. One assumes it is for the benefit of the onlooker, giving them
as chance to belieive through the action. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| v.6
- the older I get, the more scary I this story seems. What a responsibility -
to know you are going to live for another 15 years. What temptations it opens
up, and yet what perspective it creates. It is worth contemplating just what we
would choose to do right now if we were told that we had exactly 15 years to live.
Our reaction to this will depend on how old we are now, but my feeling is that
a contemplation of this will cause us to thank God that we don't know the
future. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| v.1
Setting 'in order' is a significant thing in the service of God Genesis
22:9 Exodus 26:17 39:37 40:4,23 Leviticus 1:7,8,12 6:12 24:8 1 Kings 18:33 2 Kings
20:1 2 Chronicles 13:11 29:35 Ezekiel 41:6 Acts 18:23 1 Corinthians 11:34 14:40
Titus 1:5 Do we just muddle through life or is there some order and structure to our worship and devotion to the Father. For example do we have a strategy to ensure that we read Scripture regularly or pray regularly? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 20:3
Hezekiah's prayer was answered immediately. Why was this? We know that God hears
(and answers) prayers that are voiced 'according to his will' (1
John 5:14) so we have to conclude that what Hezekiah asked was according to
God's will. Psalm
102 is a prayer of a man in dire straits. Maybe this is that prayer of Hezekiah.
If so it is instructive because the Psalmist prays for the fulfilment of God's
plan with Zion rather than seeking his own deliverance. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 20:14-17 We might wonder why the Lord reproved Hezekiah for showing his wealth to the Babylonians. Maybe he was just proud and gave the impression that it was all his doing. Or maybe he was reproved because he had already been told (Isa 14) what the Babylonians would do and therefore should have realised that the Babylonians were not people who he should be involved with. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.5 An immediate answer was given to Hezekiah's prayer, containing an assurance that the Lord was mindful of His promise to David and would accomplish it in Hezekiah's experience, both by the prolongation of his life, and his deliverance from the Assyrians. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
| It is apparent from what God says to Hezekiah, that he should have been more circumspect in what he showed the messengers from Babylon (2Kin 20:12-19). There is nothing wrong in being friendly to visitors, but the Chronicles record tells us that "God left him, to try him, that He might know all that was in his heart." (2Chron 32:31). It's obvious therefore that Hezekiah had some sort of pride or other sin in his heart when he gave the Babylonians their conducted tour. Another lesson for us! David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
|
V.7 Hezekiah became ill in 701 BC ( Isa 38:1-21). He developed a deadly boil (Heb. shechiyn). This is the same kind of deadly boil promised to a disobedient nation (botch = shechiyn) (Deut 28:35).Yahweh cured Hezekiah using a lump of figs (KJV). The fig symbolized Israel Matt 21:19; 24:32-34). Perhaps the message, here, is that: even though a death sentence had been pronounced on Israel, if it would repent, Yahweh would relent. Yahweh would hear Israel's cry as he did Hezekiah's (2Chron 20:9). Vs.12,13 After learning of his illness, Merodach-Baladan sent envoys to Hezekiah. This was two years before Sennacherib laid siege to Jerusalem. Merodach-Baladan, whose name means heir of Marduk (chief god of Babylon), was really a puppet of Sargon II. Vs.17-19 Hezekiah's revelation of his treasures to Merodach-Baladan's envoys gave rise to Isaiah's prediction of the Babylonian captivity. But, it seems that Hezekiah was more concerned that his extended life would be one of peace rather than distressing over the forthcoming calamities to Jerusalem. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
20:12-13 The record here simply records what happened. It is the record in 2Chron 32:31 which informs us that the event as ‘from God’ to ‘prove’ Hezekiah that he might know himself. It is so easy so leave God out of our lives and think that we can muddle on without any regard to His involvement in our lives. He creates environments to ‘prove’ us. We must be alert to this and be ‘exercised’ Heb 12:11, else we will not benefit from the experiences of life. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.1 Hezekiah had shown faith and had received Yahweh's grace up until the pronouncement of his death. But, after begging for extended life, things went wrong. Yahweh tested his pride through the visit of the Babylonian envoys (v.12; c.f. 2Chron 32:31). Hezekiah failed by showing off his possessions (v.13). Moreover, when confronted by Isaiah with the error, Hezekiah did not repent by confessing his sin (vs.14-18). Instead, he expressed his gladness in being able to live the rest of his life in peace (v.19). The fifteen extra years could have jeopardized his eternal life, because his former righteousness would not be able to save him from current sin, unless forgiveness was sought (Eze 33:12). Let's be careful for what we ask. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
|
20:6 Whilst the point is not made that Hezekiah was childless at this time he evidently was because Manasseh was only 12 years old when he came to the throne – 2Kin 21:1 – so he must have been born during this period when Hezekiah’s life was extended. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
FIRST REACTION
Hezekiah was sick. When we are sick or in pain, any extra problems seem to be ten times worse. Then Isaiah arrived at Hezekiah's sick bed with the bombshell to cap off Hezekiah's bad year. He said, "This is what the LORD says: Put your house in order, because you are going to die; you will not recover." (2Kin 20:1)
Hezekiah's reaction to this message is worth our careful attention. "Hezekiah turned his face to the wall and prayed to the LORD ... And Hezekiah wept bitterly." (v.2-3)
What was the time frame for his prayer and weeping? He had prayed and at least begun to weep before Isaiah had left the middle court. It was while Isaiah was on his way out from giving Hezekiah God's message, that Hezekiah's prayer was answered. Hezekiah's prayer was instantaneous. Prayer was his first reaction.
How many of us, having been given the same message, would have wept first, then prayed? Not Hezekiah. He prayed first, then wept. He prayed straight away. There was not even a stunned silence. Hezekiah was in the practice of turning to God in prayer before all else, and he did it even while he was sick. What an example for us!
Let's do the same by making communication with our Maker our first priority at all times. Prayer should always be our first reaction. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
|
V.11 Yahweh caused the sun's shadow to be reversed ten steps. Is anything too hard for the LORD? (Gen 18:14). The answer is, of course, NO! In order to perform this miracle, Yahweh did not have to alter the rotation of the earth. This was a localized event and nobody elsewhere was aware of its happening. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
20:1-6 These words are found also in Isa 38:1-8. It is very rare indeed to see such a close duplication of the words of the historical narrative in the writing of the prophets. Maybe this is just one of the details which highlight what a close relationship Hezekiah had with the prophet Isaiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
20:5 The ‘third day’ is one of the few Old Testament Scriptures which speak in a shadowy way of the time of the resurrection of Jesus Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.1 We are living in the end times, and Jesus will shortly return to earth. Is it not time that we set our house in order? Besides, like Hezekiah we could be personally presented with death at any time. It would be a pity to imperil our hope of eternal life by not being ready to meet Jesus. Vs.5,8 Hezekiah had already been told by Isaiah that he would be healed: I will heal thee: on the third day thou shalt go up unto the house of the LORD (KJV). And so, why did Hezekiah need a sign that this would occur? Hezekiah’s being condemned to death, but rising to life on the third day, was a foreshadowing of Jesus’ death and resurrection (1Cor 15:4). The scribes and Pharisees wanted a sign from Jesus. He gave them the sign of the prophet Jonah concerning His death, and resurrection in three days (Matt 12:38-40). Hezekiah had been told by the prophet Isaiah that he would, in effect, rise from death in three days. And yet, like the faithless scribes and Pharisees, Hezekiah wanted a sign. Hezekiah’s lack of faith is a commentary on Israel’s lack of faith concerning its Messiah, Jesus. Note, that Hezekiah is not entered in the book of the faithful in Hebrews 11. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
20:5 David’s response to this generosity of God is seen in Isa 38:17 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
2Kin 20:1-3 - Hezekiah is considered by some a type of Christ; Hezekiah's facing death perhaps echoed that of Christ; the skin disease (leprosy?) perhaps echoed Christ taking on our sins (2Cor 5:21;Isa 53:5,6,12;38:1,16-19). 2Kin 20:4-11 - Hezekiah is considered by some a type of Christ; Hezekiah had a third day restoration/recovery which perhaps echos the resurrection and glorification of the Son (Heb 9:12;Rom 1:4). Some of the above gleaned from The Story of the Bible, by H.P. Manfield, Vol. 4, P.109. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.10
- There is much speculation about what this might refer to, but one thing is clear,
it is portraying the depth of the wisdom and knowledge of God, and showing that
it is beyond our comprehension. Psa.36:6,
97:2, 104:24, Rom.11:33. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
10:1
sapphire stone Exodus 24:10 The description
of the glory of God that Ezekiel sees leaving the temple draws on the language
of elements of Solomon's temple in 1 Kings. The temple was to show the glory
of God - but had been profaned by Israel. Because of this He could no longer
'walk in the midst of them' Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| Throughout this
chapter I am left with the feeling that our language cannot describe what Ezekiel
saw. This may just be my personal inability, but I suspect that we will not understand
fully until we are given a pure language, design for describing those things which
are eternal. Zeph
3:9 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| That the glory
of God does not change and so is the same in the land and everywhere else is seen
by the simple statement that Ezekiel makes (10:15).
Here in Chapter 10 Ezekiel is, in vision, in Jerusalem seeing the glory depart
from the temple. In Chapter 1 he is describing the glory he saw by the river Chebar. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 10:18
Ezekiel, in Babylon, saw in vision the departure of the glory of God from the
city. He was amongst the first wave of captives and he knew the words of the prophets
that Jerusalem would be sacked by the Babylonians. So, if we consider his own
emotions as he saw the vision, we will see a man saddened by what he saw. He would
understand that the vision was the portent of the final end of the 'city of God'. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 10:15 When saying that the living creatures were like the ones seen by the river Chebar Ezekiel is telling speaking of his vision in chapter 1. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.4 The court outside was full of the Lord's brightness, while it is only the cloud that filled the house inside, the scene of idolatries, and therefore of God' displeasure. God's throne was on the threshold. The temple, once filled with brightness, is now darkened with clouds, John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.20 There is no doubt that the living creature seen here refers to, and is the same as the living creatures (Eze 1:20) Hence the living creatures of chapter one are identical with the cherubin of Chapter ten John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
Ezekiel, the captive in Babylon, was given great and heavenly visions of the power of almighty God. The angelic Beings that surround God were here recognised as “Cherubims” by Ezekiel (Eze 10:20). It’s interesting to speculate why Ezekiel was given such visions in Babylon, whereas Jeremiah and some of the other prophets did not receive such visions back home in the Holy Land. See the note on tomorrow’s chapter for one possible answer.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
10 The appearance of the glory of God contrasts starkly with the appearance of the six men with destroying weapons in their hands in Eze 9 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.2 When we go to Jeremiah's prophesy (15:14) it is clear that the fire represents the judgement of the God of Abraham upon His people. The man clothed in linen, in taking the fire and throwing it upon the city, is pouring out God's judgements. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
Vs.20,21 At the same time Yahweh is removing His glory from Jerusalem in stages (see yesterday's note), He is preparing the city for fiery destruction. The cherubim, with the four-fold faces represent the four Major Prophets and their comparative gospels. These all, of course, herald the Lord Jesus who is Immanuel, the true embodiment of Yahweh's glory. And, by extension, the four cherubim represent the Redeemed who will be with Jesus, in the kingdom, to carry out the righteous work with Him. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
10:20,22 Again we see that Ezekiel is drawn to comment that what he saw departing from the temple, in vision, was what he had seen at the beginning of his ministry in Chapter 1. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
V.14 The four creatures, which re-appeared to Ezekiel, represent the four aspects of Jesus as described through the four Major Prophets and the four gospel records (see note on Ezekiel 1). Thus, collectively, the four creatures are the embodiment of Christ. V.12 The many (pairs of?) eyes that are attached to the creatures illustrate those who make up the Body of Christ, His brothers and sisters. In John's vision of the Kingdom, the four creatures show up again at the throne of the Lord (Rev 4:6). Since the command of Christ's to spread the gospel in the entire world (Mark 16:15), countless (pairs of?) eyes have been added to His ecclesia. When the Lord's household is complete and He returns, His saints will be changed to be like Him (1John 3:2). Then, their eyes shall really see Him as He is (Rev 22:4). Furthermore, the role of the Redeemed, in the Kingdom, will be with Jesus in teaching and judging the nations. They shall be working on their task, throughout the earth. Their eyes shall, indeed, be everywhere. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
10:2 The man ‘clothed in linen’ who is going to oversee the departure of the glory of God is the same man who marked the foreheads of the faithful – Eze 9:2 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
10:4-12 The description Ezekiel gives here is full of allusions and quotations from issue to do with Solomon’s temple.
The glory of that which Solomon built at God’s instruction is to go Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.1 etc. This is largely the same vision as Ezekiel experienced in Eze 1:22-26. Vs.2,6,7 Here it is signified that Jerusalem will be burned with fire. We saw from Ch.1, that the four living creatures (cherubim) symbolize the Redeemed who will be one with the man above the throne (Jesus). Jesus and The Redeemed will, in turn, burn and destroy Babylon. This is spiritual Babylon (Rome) (Rev 18:18). As we read through Ch.10, keep in mind the significance of the four cherubim (the four living creatures) which represent Jesus and His redemptive work. The saints, who will be accepted into the Kingdom, are also part of Jesus’ redemptive work. They, too, are represented by the four cherubim. Understanding this vision of Ezekiel will be made clearer by connecting the dots in Revelation. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
10:4 The way in which the glory of God filled the house is just like it was when Solomon dedicated the same building – 1Kin 8:10. However now it marks the beginning of the end of the temple. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.1-5
- There are a number of things that Jesus does to show us that belief is above
tradition, and yet we still surround ourselves in tradition. We still seem to
portray this human tendency to want to worship tangible things and place in those
things a great deal of reverence. Are we thinking carefully about what we are
doing? Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| v.1
'the second sabbath after the first' The phrase is advertising the time of the
year - I think. Leviticus
23:15 'ye shall count ... seven sabbaths' from the first wave sheaf. So we
are two weeks after the offering of the first wave sheaf. An 'undesigned coincidence' as J J Blunt would say - is the comment that they are going through the corn fields and the corn is ripe. v.6 'another sabbath' continues the counting from the first wave sheaf offering. v.11 'madness' this word only occurs twice in Scripture. The other occasion being 2 Timothy 3:9 where it is translated 'folly'. Notice the context is of the opposition to Moses. Jesus was the 'prophet like unto' Moses. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 6:20
on - This is Luke's account of the sermon on the Mount. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| :20-38
This is Luke's account of the 'sermon on the Mount recorded in more detail in
Matthew 5-7. Whereas in Matthew is stands on it's own here in Luke it is fitted
into a more detailed context. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| What is Jesus
getting at when he says "can the blind lead the blind? Will they not both
fall into the ditch?". It doesn't seem to make sense in the context of giving!
(v38).
He picks up the same alegory of blindness in v41-42
with the plank in the eye. Are these related?
In v27-31 he explains how far we have to go before our actions to our neighbour become a credit to us in God's eyes. This credit is found in v35 "your reward will be great, and you will be the sons of the most high." But the next phrase is interesting "For he is kind to the unthankful and evil.... therefore be merciful". Hang on, hasn't he just said that if we do these things then we're good, rather than evil! At this point your point of view will diverge from mine if you believe yourself to fit into the group of "righteous", and not into this group of "unthankful and evil". If we feel we are, or have been, in this latter group, then the next verses come alive. If we believe that we are doing quite a good job of tallying up this "credit", then they won't. Jesus is saying, "you are evil, unthankful, blind, and sinning, so since God is having mercy on you, shouldn't you also have mercy on those who are in the same boat as you?". Likewise "how can you condemn, or point out the error of someone who is no worse than you are?". The giving in v38 is the giving of mercy and forgiveness as God has given it in v35-36. Jesus is making the point that if we forgive EVERYTHING, then all will be forgiven us. This is born out in v42, because since we can never remove the plank from our own eye (because we sin over and over again), so we will never be in any fit state to judge our fellows. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||
| 6:21 In saying that the hungry will be 'blessed' Jesus is appealing to the fact that God suffered Israel to hunger that they might learn to trust him(Deut 8:3) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.1 According to Deut 23:25 The only thing wrong (or against the law) was by rubbing the corn in their hands, they were threshing, which by the law was forbidden. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
6:6 ‘Another sabbath’ continues the point of conflict between the Jewish leaders and Jesus about what could be done on the sabbath – clearly Jesus had been doing things between the sabbaths. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.7 The pedantic Pharisees were looking for an occasion to catch Jesus healing on the Sabbath because they wanted to accuse Him of working. Jesus explained that this was not a problem (v.9 c.f. Matt 12:10-12). In any event, He confounded them by orally commanding the healing. In what way does speaking constitute work (v.10)? Besides which, as Jesus points out, the priests break the Sabbath law when they perform their duties in the temple, and are not held to account (Matt 12:5). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
6:15 Whilst ‘Matthew’ and ‘James the son of Alphaeus’ are separated in Luke’s list of the twelve they were, in fact flesh brothers. Mark 2:14 shows that Levi was the son of Alphaeus but Levi is another name for Matthew for in Mark 3:18 ‘Lei’ has become ‘Matthew’. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| From the first day of their call the disciples began the challenge of putting away the "old man" Adam, and putting on the "new man" Christ. Rooting out all forms of pride and replacing it with humility. Bringing into our lives the commandments that Christ placed upon the disciples is our discipleship today. They learned to suffer wrong, never to resist evil. They learned to trust in God with all the problems they faced. Regardless how difficult it may seem to us, we must always remember that each one of us can overcome the ways of the flesh, otherwise we would have never been called. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
6:7-8 We should not presume that Jesus ‘knew their thoughts’ because of any supernatural power that he possessed. He understood human nature and had experienced the ire of the leaders on the Sabbath and so would have worked out what they were likely to think and do. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Vs.28-30 Today, it is the norm to stand up for your human rights. If you do not demand satisfaction for wrong done to you, you can be considered weak and peculiar. And yet, that is what the Lord demands of His followers. We are not here to contend for any rights. We are here to show the submissive example of Jesus to all, even if it means personal loss. It takes strength, courage, and faith to do that. Let us remember that this is their world and we are just sojourning, just passing through, representing Jesus as we go. And when Jesus returns, we shall inherit our world. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
6:19 We regularly read of Jesus healing people. Do we think that Jesus’ miracles required effort on his part? This use of ‘virtue’ indicates at least that Jesus was aware of each healing he performed. Doubtless performing miracles was a tiring experience. It certainly involved as fellowshipping of the suffering of the one being healed as can be seen from the way that amidst a number of miracles Matthew – Matt 8:17- says that Jesus healings was a fulfilment of Isa 53:4 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
WE SET THE STANDARD The day of judgement is coming. I wonder how harsh Jesus will be in his judgement of me? If he wanted to, he could point out all my faults, the ones I know about and the ones I don't know about. He could tell me all of the opportunities I have missed to serve him, and all of the times I just stuff up, even though I do my best. But I also wonder how forgiving and generous he will be when he judges me. If it is a mans glory to overlook an offense (Prov 19:11), then it must be even more so for the King. We can wonder all we like, but the answer is found in the way we live, in the judgement we measure out and in the generosity with which we give and forgive. Jesus said, "Do not judge and you will not be judged. Do not condemn and you will not be condemned. Forgive and you will be forgiven. Give and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you." (Luke 6:37-38) What Jesus is saying is that we set the standard. The standard of judgement, kindness, love and forgiveness that we show to other people will be the standard by which we will be judged. If you want to be judged harshly, live harshly. But if you, like me, realise the need to be forgiven, we also must learn to be generous in our forgiveness. We set the standard. How will we be judged? Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
Vs.2-4 This exchange illustrates the difference between the letter of the Law, and the spirit of the Law. Strictly, under the Law, David should not have eaten the showbread. But, the greater principle of saving a life surpassed the strict adherence to the Law. V.5 Jesus used the example of David purposefully. David was the anointed of Yahweh (1Sam 16:13). He foreshadowed Jesus. Jesus will be the one to assume sitting on the throne of David (Luke 1:32). And so, David as Yahweh’s anointed, could override the Letter of the Law. Jesus, who is the Messiah, the Son of God, the greater David, came to fulfil the Law (Matt 5:17). In fulfilling the Law, Jesus became Lord of the Sabbath. Note, the word also (KJV) comes from the Greek kai . It also means even which makes for a better translation. This is how kai is translated in Matt 12:8.Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
6:35 Jesus’ instruction that we should be merciful as God is merciful adds to Jesus’ words in the Sermon on the Mount – Matt 5:48– where he enjoins perfection on us. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||