|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| This very practical
chapter demonstrates how God knows the future. We have here a turn of events so
dramatic and unlikely that no-one could have predicted it, but by the power of
God, Elisha was able to make this proclaimation and so convince those around him
of his truth as a prophet. Here was an immediate fulfilment of the prophecy of
the day before - the test of a prophet. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.11
The word 06441 'Within' is used exclusively
of the temple / tabernacle Leviticus
10:18 1 Kings 6:18 19 21 29 30 2 Kings 7:11 2 Chronicles 3:4 29:16 18 Psalm 45:13
Ezekiel 40:16 41:3 showing that it is a specialised word. There is always
value in looking at the distribution of the way in which a word is used in Scripture. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| We cannot help
but be struck by the way in which God dispersed the Syrians. He caused them to
hear a noise which frightened them into fleeing. This was a direct way that God
chose on this occasion but we note that it is not the norm. Usually there was
some effort required of the people. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Language from this chapter is seen in Revelation 6 in the seals
Showing that the siege of Samaria and the dire circumstances of the inhabitants of the city at that time are a pattern of the distress that is seen in the events of the seals. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :12
Interestingly, despite having been told by the prophet that they would be delivered
(:1-2)
the king did not believe that deliverance had come. He trusted his 'lord' on whose
arm he leaned more than his LORD in whose arm he should have trusted. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 7:3 Have you thought about the providential way in which these lepers were outside the city? God had already said, though Elisha, that the 'lord' would see the plenty but not benefit from it. Had these lepers not been at the gate to go into the camp of the Syrians then the subsequent events may well not have taken place. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.10 The uniform arrangement of encampments in the east is to place the tents in the center, while the cattle are picketed all around, as an outer wall of defense; hence the lepers describe the cattle as the first objects they saw. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Continuing with our types in the account of Elisha, we read today of incredible plenty being available, first seen by the leprose men (was this Gehazi and his sons?) Does this show us that the gentiles and previous enemies will all work together, and live in peace, when the windows in heaven are opened? This is the promise of the Kingdom. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
V.1 The siege of Samaria had been long and hard. The Israelites had been devastated by starvation, disease, and death. Desperate conditions had produced desperate actions, such as cannibalism. Times were bleak and there seemed no hope in sight. And yet, suddenly Yahweh changed conditions. Let us remember such examples when we hit low spots in our lives, when things look desperate and hopeless. Yahweh can swiftly reverse fortunes: Is any thing too hard for the LORD? (Gen 18:14). Let us put our trust in Him: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. (Prov 3:5,6). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
7:19 So the lord who did not believe the words of the prophet did not benefit from their fulfilment. Notice ::16,17 emphasises that Elisha was speaking the word of God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
7:16 Against the background of a king who did not believe in the God of Israel He was shown to be in control of world events, though it did not seem to have an impact upon the king. In like manner we may see God’s hand at work in the nations but still not place our personal trust in Him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
Vs.1,16,18 The seah was a measure of capacity and the shekel a weight. The seah was one-third of an ephah which was, itself, between three-eighths and two-thirds of a bushel. A bushel is approximately 35 liters (US measure); or 36 liters (imperial measure). The shekel was the standard weight for gold and silver in the Near-East at the time, but could vary between 9-17 gm. There is no indication in this chapter whether the shekel referred to silver or to gold. However, to be consistent with the valuations of 6:25, I suspect that silver is meant.That being the case, let's compare: the capacity of a seah was approx 9 liters. And so, 1 seah of flour (9 liters) would cost the equivalent of $6.40 by today's valuation of silver. Two seahs (18 litres) of barley would cost the same. Remember the price of the pulse in Ch.6? It was $8. Now, 6 cabs = 1 seah. Therefore, 1 seah of pulse would have cost $194, which would be 30 times the price of 1 seah of flour. And so, we can see the quick reversal of fortune that Yahweh had wrought. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
7:2 That the ‘lord’ would see and yet not benefit from the plenty because of his unbelief is like the Jews who will see Abraham in the kingdom and themselves thrust out – Luke 13:28 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.3 There are some commentators who think that the four lepers were Gehazi and his three sons. However, I have not seen any hard evidence of this. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
7:3-4 The situation of these four men was terrible, really. The city was shut up for fear of the Syrians. The four men were outside the city, unable to enter, waiting for the Syrians to come against the city. They had no food or water, the people in the city did not care for them enough to even try to make provision for them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
7:6 Here is a clear example that God can save in the quiet way. No one had heard anything, the Syrians had just got an idea and so fled. Naaman had thought that God required some ‘great thing’ but learnt it was in the little things that God can be seen. Likewise here. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2Kin 7:1-2 - this prophecy was fulfilled the next day as Peter Cresswell noted in his 2001 comments - it indicates how faith and spiritual food is necessary for salvation/life [prophetic fulfillment 2Kin 7:16-20 - the officer was rejected at the "gate" Heb. "shahar" (8176) means "opening, door, gate" - John 10:7,9]. 2Kin 7:3-4,8-10 - Lepers (figuratively sinners who were facing death) enter the V.3 "gate" (8176); V.8 receive food, drink, gold (faith purified by affliction?), silver (redemption?), new raiment (clothes of righteousness?); V.9 day of "good tidings" [Heb. "besorah" (1319) means "reward for good news, good news, glad tidings, good tidings"] and perhaps echos the hope in Gospel we share; V.10 the lepers share the good news with the "porter" [Heb. "shoer" (7778) means "gatekeeper, doorkeeper"]. The four lepers somewhat contrast with Naaman (2Kin 5:5,9,16) who tries to purchase freedom from figurative sin and death by offering gold, silver and new raiment - we can't earn or pay the price for freedom, it is a freely offered gift of grace fully paid for by Christ - faith and love are required not our possessions. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.
15 - Wormwood is noted for its intense bitterness Deut.
29:18 Prov. 5:4 Jer. 9:15 Amos 5:7 It is a type of bitterness, affliction,
remorse, suffering. In Amos
6:12 this Hebrew word is translated "hemlock" . See also Rev.8:10,11
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.31
'will not cast off His People' forms the basis for Paul's comment in Romans
11:1 The power of the use in Romans is that even at a time when Israel were
in Babylon for their sins God had not forgotten them. So even though they had
crucified their Messiah [Acts
2:23] the salvation that is available through the gospel is still available
to them. Such is the love of the Father. v.37 Acknowledging that our actions are determined by the Lord's will is first seen in King David. 2 Samuel 15:25,26 and re stated by his son Solomon Proverbs 19:21 Jeremiah draws the attention of those who would speak falsely to the fact that Yahweh determines actions. Lamentations 3:37 This clear Old Testament concept then passes into New Testament use being seen first in the Lord Luke 22:42 And then in the apostles Acts 18:21 Romans 1:10 15:32 1 Corinthians 4:19 16:7 Hebrews 6:3 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.21
is the result of the contemplation of the terrors described in v.1-19.
v.20
provides the link - the link is in recognition of our own position, and the consequent
humility. It is through the bad things of life that we gain. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 3:40
The call to search and try [their] ways was given because Israel should have been
able to see why they were in captivity. If they had recognised their waywardness
even at this late stage God would have forgiven them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| HELP FOR DEPRESSION It was the worst trouble anyone could be in when the city you live in and love is besieged by the enemy, when all of your friends and loved ones turn against you and the LORD your God, when you see them dying of diseases or starvation or you hear the army ravaging and killing on the streets and you hear the screams of the people you love as they are taken or die. No wonder Jeremiah said, "My soul is downcast within me." But in the midst of all his depression and weeping there was one thing that still picked him up. "Because of the LORD's great love we are not consumed, for his compassions never fail. They are new every morning; great is your faithfulness," he said. No matter how bad things might get for us, for most of us they will never get as bad as they did for Jeremiah or Job. Yet both of these men could honestly say that they still had hope in the LORD. The LORD their God was the one who picked them up out of their depression and helped them through it. He will do it for us too. So no matter how bad things get, let us always put our hope in God whose faithfulness and compassions never fail, but are new every morning. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| As you read this
chapter notice the way in which Jeremiah sees the destruction of Jerusalem as
a personal calamity. This can be seen in the repeated use of 'I' 'my' 'me' 'mine'
But when he comes to speak about how he should feel he includes all those that would turn to God in his comment :25 The Lord is good unto them ' Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 3:19 'wormwood and the gall' quotes Deut 29:18 - the culmination of the curses that God said would come upon Israel if they were unfaithful. We saw many links with Deuteronomy 28 and Leviticus 26, too many to enumerate here, when we worked through the prophecy of Jeremiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.27 The "yoke" to be accepted humbly by the faithful (Jer 37:8-12), was the yoke which Christ later offered. Also, it is important that we begin to bear this yoke in our youth if possible; Youth is the time for establishing life long ambitions and habits; it is also the time for high hopes, when we may fail to understand the utter futility of seeking fame and riches. The things learned in our youth will be the most easily remembered when harder times come. Think what Solomon wrote; Ecc 12:1 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| V.59 Jeremiah cities God's gracious answers to his prayers as an encouragement to his fellow countrymen, God's past deliverances and His knowledge of Judah's wrongs are made the grounds of prayer for relief. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
Jeremiah had been warning the men of Jerusalem and Judah for years about the coming destruction on the city. But they would not repent, and he suffered greatly for his message. He knew that Yahweh was just in bringing such punishment, but he still could not be restrained in sorrow or compassion for the events that took place. We must not forget that Yahweh has feelings too (Psa 78:40). He must have also felt great sorrow. After all, Jerusalem was the city in which He chose to put His Name (1Kin 11:36). Even though the enemy must fall, it is not a matter for rejoicing (Prov 24:17). We should also take the same attitude. When the enemies of Yahweh fall, we should be glad (for His sake) but not gloat. Who are we to be self-righteous? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
V.1,21,22,25,31,32,33,40,57 - we read of affliction, hope, self-examination, repentance, and God's compassion. In Heb 12:6-11 we read of God chastening those whom he loves and the positive benefits that can result. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
| Despite the terrible traumas Jeremiah had suffered, he still is able to say, “It is of the Lord’s mercy that we are not consumed” (Lam 3:22). He was certain that God was still therefore him. The prophet had literally called upon God’s name out of the low dungeon (Lam 3:55), and God heard his cry. So the Lord is for us, also. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
3:22 It may seem odd that Jeremiah speaks of benefiting from God’s mercies. Actually Jeremiah realised that the nation deserved to be destroyed for their sins. So that they were sent to Babylon showed God’s mercy. In the same way it is through God’s mercy that we do not die without hope. Adam and his children deserved death – nothing else. It is only through God’s mercies that we still live. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
3:22-24 Jeremiah was able to see God’s ‘compassion’ and have ‘hope’ in such difficult a situation as when the city of Jerusalem was destroyed because he knew that God had also promised a regathering of Israel at the end of the 70 years. Can we have such trust when things appear to be falling apart around us? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
Vs.59-66 Jeremiah calls on Yahweh to punish his (Jeremiah's) enemies. This is akin to David's imprecatory psalms (those appealing for curses or judgements on his enemies). These invocations are not calls for revenge solely on behalf of the sufferer. The enemies of the righteous sufferer are also the enemies of Yahweh. Yahweh has also been abused in these circumstances, and so divine retribution is warranted. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
3:53 In speaking of ‘in the dungeon’ Jeremiah may well be reflecting on his condition when the city of Jerusalem was besieged – Jer 38:6 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.22-26 This third elegy of Jeremiah provides a powerful exhortation. Yahweh will try those whom He loves. But, whatever trials he brings, and some of them might be very difficult, He will never leave us (Heb 13:5). When things look desperate, we should turn to Yahweh because His mercy is unfailing. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
3:25-27 So Jeremiah sees good coming from the events that have overtaken Jerusalem. He must be thinking of the chastening hand of God and the benefit of responding to the chastening because there was no short term benefit. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.1-19 Jeremiah pours out his anxiety and complaint about the way he was treated during his witness in Jerusalem. There are glimpses of Job in Jeremiah’s experience. Compare, for example, v.4 with Job 16:8; 30:30. V.21 etc. After his complaint, Jeremiah remembers that there is hope of salvation because of Yahweh’s mercy. Repentance and forgiveness are necessary before Yahweh will render His grace. But, salvation is possible to those who are contrite. Like Jeremiah, we have trials in our lives, yet we live in hope of salvation. To ensure a successful end, we must remain in contact with Our Heavenly Father. Rom 12:12 sums up this three-part formula: Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| v52-57 appears to refer to the time Jeremiah was stuck in the mire at the bottom of the dungeon. If this is the case, we have a few extra details here not mentioned in Jeremiah 38. In v53 "they threw stones at me" suggests they threw stones at him as he sank in the mire, unable to move out of harms way. So he could have been wounded and bruised as well as emaciated when Ebed Melech lifted him out. More reason why Ebed Melech was so careful with Jeremiah not to hurt him with a rope (Jer 38:11-13). But the water in v54 is unlikely to be a literal detail, because Jer 38:6 says there was no water in the dungeon. Instead, it is a turn of phrase used also in Psa 68:1-4 referring to his overwhelming sorrow. This is also the context of our chapter as we can see by the same wording in 48-51. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
3:23 Her Jeremiah is reflecting on the chastening hand of God. The affliction will be replaced with compassion when Israel repent Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.2
- This is one of the few places where scripture actually gives us an instruction
to do something regularly on the first day of the week. There is no instruction
about breaking bread weekly, as far as I can find. Please click my name below
and tell me if you think there is. It seems to me that they broke bread every
time they met - in houses, or wherever, not in the rather ritualistic way that
we do it, but giving of money here is encouraged on a regular basis, so that it
is there when it is needed. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.1
- 3 The giving of money to those in need is part of the service that the brethren
and sisters could do for others. The situation was that in Jerusalem there were
many brethren and sisters who were destitute because of their faith in Jesus. Jewish brethren, who accepted Jesus, were 'put out of the synagogue'. The implication of this is that they were ostracised by their Jewish brethren and as such would not be able to work in a Jewish environment. They would loose all their friends as well. With no social security they were truly destitute. v.10 Notice the matter to despising Timothy is raised. This problem raises it's ugly head again 1 Timothy 4:12 Clearly a problem for the young man Timothy wherever he went. v.17 Notice the effect that a pastoral visit had on Paul. We tend to think of spiritual giants as being self sufficient. This should show us that they are not. The fellowship of a likeminded brother or sister can be seen from this example to be invaluable. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 16:10
The issue of 'fear' and Timothy is also seen in 2
Timothy 1:7 as if there was something about the way that brethren and sisters
might have reacted to his teaching which unsettled him. We know that there were
serious problems at Corinth and so doubtless Timothy would have had hard things
to say to them. Paul, it seems, was conscious of the possibility that the brethren
might well have been hostile towards Timothy because of his message. This comment
advertised to the Corinthians that he was aware of that possibility. Such knowledge
may well have tempered their response to Timothy. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| We have a couple
of indications of what ecclesial life was like in the first century in this chapter. :2 They met 'on the first day of the week'. :19 Some, if not all, meetings were held in private houses. We should be alert to little snippets like this which help to build in our minds a clearer picture of ecclesial life in the first century. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Is it my imagination,
or can I detect a hint of sadness and hopelessness in the words of Paul? In v1-3
Paul feels he has to command them to make a weekly collection for their brothers
in Jerusalem. Would they not, by themselves, have done this? Was the Church in
Corinth so without compassion? In v10-11
Paul feels the need to urge them not to despise Timothy. Were they so blind as
to not be able to discern a trustworthy brother by themselves? In v15-18
he has to urge them to submit to the love and ministrations of brothers who were
more mature in the faith, and perhaps more devoted. Were they so quick to reject
the help and love of others?
And then a single statement at the end of the letter: "if anyone does not love the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be accursed (anathema)", which surely reveals to us the extent to which he was worried about their very salvation. Had the church in Corinth gone so far downhill that such strong words were necessary? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| I agree. There
is no specific instruction about breaking bread weekly on the first day. Why?
The three points below were developed by Bro. Douglas Egles of our ecclesia during a conversation I had with him regarding the question posed above. Consider: 1. Slaves of the Romans had the first day of the week off. 2. The synagogues were vacant on the first day for the Jews met on the sabbath. 3. Christ rose on the first day and they were preaching the resurrection. Bob Davis [] Comment added in 2003 reply to Bob |
||||||||||
| 16:13 The quotations 'quit ... be strong' from the mouths of the Philistines 1Sam 4:9 might seem rather odd. However it is the attitude of the Philistines in adversity that Paul is showing as the example that the Corinthians should follow. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.19 "salute" Our translation of the Greek word ASPAZOMAI (782) does not show the warmth that it has in the original. It is translated "embrace" (Acts 20:1, Heb 11:3) It comes from a Greek word meaning "to enfold in the arms." John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Some make the claim that they follow first-century Christianity. However, many elements have changed over time, particularly in the western world. Gone are the extreme poverty and ostracism experienced in the first century. Many ecclesias own their meeting halls, while others might rent. Very few meet in homes. These changes are not inherently evil, but there is a danger of becoming institutionalized, complacent, and removed from the biting reality that we should be demonstrably different from those around. There are ecclesias, in some parts of the developing world, that are in war-zones. Danger, poverty, and the threat of starvation all exist there. Just like the poor brethren of Jerusalem, these brethren have to be cared for by those who have the means to do so. Care should be taken not to be too comfortable, lest we be accused by the Lord like the Laodiceans (Rev 3:17). Look at the example of Israel (Deut 32:15). There should be no hesitation, as ecclesias or individuals, to lose it all for the sake of Christ (Matt 6:19,20; 19:23,24,29). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:2 The simple mention of ‘first day of the week’ is part of the New Testament incidental evidence that the believers met regularly on the first day of the week. Another example is Acts 20:7 We need to take care to be aware that some of our practices, though not commanded, have Biblical precedent. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| EFFECTIVE WORK AT HOME It has always been the case that the grass looks greener on the others side of the fence. That principle can even apply to mission work. We watch people going away overseas to preach the gospel in far off places, and we think that they have so much more opportunity to preach the word and to work for the Lord than we have here at home. It is obvious from Paul's letter to the Corinthians that there was a lot of work that needed to be done in the church at Corinth. Preaching, reforming and encouraging the believers would have seemed like a wonderful challenge to take on for the Lord. At that time Paul was in Ephesus. Over a period of years, Paul spent a lot of time in Ephesus. It must have almost seemed like home to him. But Paul was not blind to the fact that there were opportunities to serve the Lord at home so that he was about to run off, drop everything and preach elsewhere.. The mission field can seem appealing - and it is. There is plenty of work to be done for those who chose to do it. However, we only need to open our eyes to see that there is just as much work to do at home. Paul said, "I will stay on at Ephesus until Pentecost, because a great door of effective work has opened to me." (1Cor 16:8-9) Let us pray that our eyes will be opened to the great door of effective work we can do in our own churches right at home Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| V.12 Probably Apollos' unwillingness to go to Corinth was because, being aware of the admiration of his rhetorical style which had led astray some at Corinth, he did not want to sanction it.(1Cor 1:12, 1Cor 3:4) Paul could not state in this letter these reasons. Paul does however show that he had no ill feeling towards Apollos, as he refers to him as brother, which shows the unity between the two of them. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
16:8 In saying that he ‘will tarry at Ephesus until Pentecost’ we have data which helps to date this letter. It must have been written shortly before Acts 20:16 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 16:22 With the use of the two words "Anathema Maran-atha", Paul is reminding all of the simple truth, that those who love not the Lord Jesus Christ will be accursed when our King returns to this earth. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.14 Paul's states a simple command: Do everything in love (NIV). If we can remember this in all our dealings with one another, then pride and rancour will not occur. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:14 Remember when Paul talks about things being done ‘with charity’ he has associated ‘charity’ with ‘edification’ – 1Cor 10:23 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.2 A person should give according to his/her means. Paul does not suggest a formula, such as a tithe (10%). He leaves the amount up to the individual, as a free-will offering. Yahweh, of course, knows what amount is given, and the attitude with which it is given. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:3 Paul’s relationship with the brethren and sisters in Corinth was, to say the least, rocky. In order to minimise the possibility of further accusations against Paul he is concerned that the money collected is taken to Jerusalem by someone approved by the believers in Corinth. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.14 Paul spends all of 1 Corinthians Ch.13 developing this theme of charity. His conclusion is that to be effective and acceptable, all things must be done in charity. One can do the right thing, but if the attitude is not right, the effort is not acceptable. V.22 The words Anathema and Maranatha (KJV) mean: anathema = accursed; maranatha = the Lord come. The word accursed in 1Cor 12:3 is translated from the Greek anathema. The word maranatha is of Syriac (Middle Aramaic) origin. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
16:8-9 In explaining why he may ‘tarry at Ephesus’ Paul is showing the believers in Corinth that there are other things to consider than just their own position. We would do well to reflect on this principle, especially when we think our problems are so massive that they tend to take over our whole lives. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
FIVE INSTRUCTIONS
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| Reading v1-4 as if it were addressed to you, how do you think you would feel? Paul is very direct in commanding that everyone should give money. Bear in mind that there were already those who didn't accept Paul's authority (see 1:10-12, 2Cor 10:7-9). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
||||||||||