|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.21
In naming his son 'Er' Shelah may well have been trying to preserve the name of
his brother who died before the Lord Genesis
46:12 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :1-23
Sons of Judah :24-37 Sons of Simeon :38-43 Some specific exploits of the sons of Simeon Having worked through another line of sons of Judah we now turn to the sons of Simeon. Note (:41) the mention of Hezekiah indicates that this list at least, was written after the days of Hezekiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :43
The Amalekites were like a running sore to Israel. They discomfited Israel in
the wilderness (Exodus
17:8) and crop up regularly as Israel's enemies during the time of the Judges
and on into the time of the kings. So Saul's rebellion was the more serious. He
had disregarded a direct command from God to destroy them (Deuteronomy
25:19) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 4:9-10 Jabez is only mentioned here. The details in these verses may seem irrelevant and of little value. However maybe they are an indication that Jabez was unique in his generation for his Honour - integrity. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.9-10 An added thought to Bro. Peter's comment on Jabez. He enjoyed a remarkable degree of prosperity, and God, in this instance, proved that He was not only the hearer, but also the answerer of prayer. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
The last few verses in today's chapter (1Chron 4:24-43,) tell us more of Simeon's tribe than we read almost anywhere else. It seems as though the Simeon tribe were subsumed within Judah. This brings Jacob's prophecy true, where he said that Simeon and Levi would be divided and scattered in Israel (Gen 49:5-7) because of their cruelty to Shechem Gen 34).
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
4:39-43 This fairly extensive historical comment, mentioning Hezekiah – indicates that the details of the book of Chronicles were finally incorporated into a book after Hezekiah had been on the throne – probably in the days of Ezra or Nehemiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
4:14 It seems that the valley was so named because of the trade of the sons of Joab for Charashim means craftsmen – the two Hebrew words are related. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
V.43 The Amalekites were descended from Amalek, the grandson of Esau (Gen 36:12). Esau was always at odds with Jacob (Israel), and so it was with the Amalekites. They were the first to attack Israel after they had emerged from Egypt during the Exodus (Num 24:20). The Amalekites continued their hostilities against Israel even after Israel had entered the land of Canaan. Yahweh gave Saul the task of destroying the Amalekites, but he failed (1Sam 15:2-4). The Amalekites, as a collective force, were finally eradicated by the Simeonites in the late eighth century BC. However, we do see a vestige of the Amalekites appear at a later time. In the fifth century BC, Esther encountered Haman the Agagite (Est 3:1). Agag was king of the Amalekites (1Sam 15:8). After Haman was killed, we hear no more references to Agag or the Amalekites in scripture. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
AGAINST THE ODDS
It was in the days of Hezekiah that God reduced the kingdom of Israel down to nothing, and finally removed it from his Land. Israel were unfaithful to him. The king of Assyria also marched down against Hezekiah and captured the fortified cities of Judah. It was a time when Judah was on the back foot. They were not the aggressors, but the defenders. So it was against this background that we see a surprising turn of events.
The men of Simeon bucked all the trends of weakness and unfaithfulness, to expand their territory and put the remaining Amelekites to death. If they had been looking around them and taking their cues from the rest of Israel and Judah, they would have been cowering at home, prepared to fight in defence, but also prepared for defeat. Instead they stood up in faith, and claimed the Land that God had said he would give them.
It only takes a small amount of faith for God to move in a situation. We can be inspired by the men of Simeon, because while it appears that society, and even many faithful people, seem to be sliding toward destruction, we can, even though we are small in faith and number, buck the trend and live a life of faith that is victorious in the strength of the Lord. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
4:1 In speaking of the sons of Judah we now deal with that which is summarised in 1Chron 2:4 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
4:24 Now we deal with the sons of ‘Simeon’ – though the firstborn he follows Judah – 1Chron 4:1 – marking in this book of families how Judah supersedes Simeon in the matter of birthright. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.9,10 Jabez means sorrow. It appears that he was given that name because his mother had a difficult time in giving birth to him. Jabez was an honorable man who wished not to live life according to the meaning of his name. He asked Yahweh for a blessing to let him grow into greatness, and to avoid sorrow in his life. Yahweh granted Jabez his petition. Jewish writings say that Jabez became a great doctor of the Law. His reputation became known far and wide. He attracted many scribes to him. It seems that the town named after him became a center of learning (1Chron 2:55). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
4:21-23 Here we have two families who are described as having particular skills. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.2
- The word riddle (<02420> chiydah)
is used of a secret - and usually a dark secret at that. Num.12:8
(dark speeches) 1Kings 10:1, 2Chron.9:1 (hard questions). However, here and
in several other places, the dark sayings are attributed to the wise, so clearly
the idea is of things that are revealed only to those who seek them out - Psa.49:4,
78:2, Prov.1:6. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 17:8
bear fruit John 15:8 17:23 under it ... dwell Daniel 4:12 17:24 green tree, dry Luke 23:30 The parable of verses 1 - 10 speak of the removal of Israel and then Judah into captivity. The use of 'vine' language catches the image that Yahweh, through Isaiah, presents in Isaiah 5 In a time reminiscent of the Babylonian invasion Jesus takes the message of Ezekiel 17:8 and makes it very personal. Whilst Ezekiel is speaking of the nation and its fruits Jesus takes the ideas of the prophet and applies them to individuals. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.3
- That is, Nebuchadnezzar who had great power, riches and many countries under
him, will come to Jerusalem and take away the king, as in v.12.
It seems strange that God should choose to use the picture of the eagle for this
nation of evil, where it is elsewhere, apparently used mainly for powers of good. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 17:15
The one who 'rebelled' was Zedekiah. The account of this is in
2 Kings 24:20 2 Chronicles 36:13 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| THE BRANCH There is a neat description of Jesus at the end of this parable from verses 22 - 24. He is spoken of firstly as a shoot from the very top of a cedar, a tender sprig from its topmost shoots. The cedar, we find earlier in the parable, represented Judah and its branches were its people - especially its noble people. Jesus was the best of God's people and was planted in Israel. Next he is described as being planted on the mountain heights of Israel. So Jesus is given a position above all others. Isaiah 11 v 1 says, "A shoot will come up from the stump of Jesse; from his roots a branch will bear fruit." And Philippians 2 v 9 says that "God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow." Jesus was different from the rest of Israel because he bore fruit whereas he described Israel as a dry and dying tree. We are also described in this parable. We are represented by the "birds of every kind" that nest in the tree and find shelter in its branches. Jesus is the one we must go to for shelter. He said, "Come to me all you who are weary and burdened and I will give you rest." More than just being a refuge, Jesus must also be our home, the centre of our lives, where we are comfortable, safe and warm. Let's make sure that Jesus is like that for us. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 17:15
The covenant which Zedekiah broke is outlined in Jeremiah
34:8-11 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 17:20 Whilst Ezekiel said that Zedekiah would be taken to Babylon he tried escape (2Kin 25:4)highlighting that he rally did not believe God's prophetic word. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.24 The destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 ushered in the dry tree period, which still remains today. The final phase of Ezekiel's prophecy remains to be fulfilled when the Lord will make the "dry tree to flourish" This will be fulfilled when the "tender one", already exalted and anointed King, will be planted as King in the "mountain of the height of Israel" (v.23) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| V.22-23. "A tender one" Zerubbabel never reigned as a universal king, nor could the great things mentioned here be said of him, except as a type of Messiah. The Messiah alone can be meant originally; "a tender plant and a root out of a dry ground" Isa 53:2 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.24 The dry tree (Heb. yabesh ets) applies essentially to Israel who will be made to flourish when Jesus comes to redeem them.The phrase also has a more personal connotation. Isaiah talks of strangers (Gentiles) attaching themselves to Israel (wild olive branch), and to eunuchs feeling like a dry tree (yabesh ets) (Isa 56:3). Yahweh says that they will be fully accepted if they follow Him faithfully (Isa 56:4-7). The Lord Jesus makes reference to eunuchs in Matt 19:12. Whether other-imposed or self-imposed, these faithful dry trees will ultimately flourish in the Kingdom. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Today’s chapter is one where God gives the prophet a picture (Eze 17:1-10), and then very carefully explains it (Eze 17:11-24). Israel is to be plucked off, and carried to Babylon – but in the end (Eze 17:22-24) the kingdom will be established in Jerusalem. The Lord’s promises, and His mercy, will prevail. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
17:8 The vine was planted in as fertile sport – like Isaiah 5:1-2 – that it might ‘bear fruit’ like ourselves – John 15:8. We must take care that we are not like Judah to whom Ezekiel spoke. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
17:23 The promise that a tree which would grow so that all fowls could lodge in it speaks of Babylon and provides the basis for Daniel’s words – Dan 4:12 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
V.3 Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon was the servant of God (Jer 25:9). Acting on behalf of Yahweh, he made a treaty with Zedekiah that if Judah would become subservient to Babylon it would survive. Zedekiah agreed, but then rebelled, thinking that he could elicit the help of Egypt to defeat Babylon. This foolish move cost Zedekiah the lives of his sons and nobles; the loss of his eyes, and later his life. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
17:12 It is only Ezekiel who uses the phrase ‘rebellious house’ and he uses the phrase 12 times to speak of Israel Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
17:24 The drying up of the ‘green tree’ is the basis for Jesus’ words in Luke 23:31 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
BROKEN PROMISE The king of Judah had made a treaty with the king of Babylon. To seal the treaty, he had taken an oath. The agreement that king Zedekiah of Judah made with king Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon was a very important treaty. It gave peace to the people of Judah while they kept their side of the bargain. Zedekiah chose to break his agreement. Perhaps breaking a promise didn't seem a big deal to Zedekiah. After all, it was only a promise between himself and a ruthless foreign king - wasn't it? God saw it differently. Several times the treaty is described as Nebuchadnezzar's treaty, but finally the Soverign LORD says, "As surely as I live, I will bring down on his head my oath that he despised and my covenant that he broke." (Eze 17:19) This was not just a promise between two men, it was a promise betwen the two kings and God. God took it very seriously. Zedekiah had serious consequences to face after breaking his promise. God sees our promises in the same way. Promises are a serious issue. They are not just made between husband and wife, employer and employee, supplier and customer, but they also include God. Our promises are between us and God, as well as the other party. Let's not make the same mistake as Zedekiah, but keep the promises we make. God is watching. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| A tree planted by God: Eze 17:22-24 - it has been pointed out previously that there may be a connection to Isa 53:2; I wonder if there might also be a connection with Matt 13:31-32. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
V.3 The eagle here is symbolic of Nebuchadnezzar. The highest branch of the cedar (KJV) symbolizes Jehoiakim (Jehoiachin) whom Nebuchadnezzar took captive to Babylon (2Kin 24:15). V.4 The young twigs were carried into a land of traffic (KJV); trade (ESV), signified that the young princes of Judah would be transported to Babylon (Jer 29:1,2). V.5 The seed of the land is Zedekiah. He was made king of Judah, but was a vassal of Babylon (City on the Euphrates – great waters (KJV)). The willow (Zedekiah) is dependent upon waters (Babylon) for survival. V.6 The vine (Judah) was of low stature (KJV); low spreading (ESV) ( had growth restricted because of control by Babylon). V.7 This eagle was Pharaoh-hophra, king of Egypt. The vine (Zedekiah) did bend her roots toward him (KJV) (tried to make an alliance with Egypt to throw off the shackles of Babylon). V.8 Nebuchadnezzar had left Zedekiah and Judah in a comfortable position, as long as they accepted the dominance of Babylon. V.9 The rhetorical question was: Would Zedekiah be able to throw off the shackles of Babylon? The answer was No! Nebuchadnezzar would answer Zedekiah’s treason by being constrained to depose Zedekiah, and to destroy his children (pull up its roots and cut off its fruit (ESV)). Also, Zedekiah’s nobles would perish (leaves wither (ESV)). Furthermore, all this would be done with a minimal amount of force (without great power (KJV)). V.10 utterly wither indicates that Zedekiah would be the last monarch of Judah. V.21 Those who tried to escape from the control of Babylon, and those who fled to Egypt would die. Vs.22-24 By contrast to Jehoiakim (v.3), the highest branch of the high cedar (KJV) here refers to Jesus when He returns to earth to rule (Isa 4:2). He is the Branch of promise who will rule the world (Isa 11:1-4). He will bring bounty and order to His Kingdom. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Ezekiel 17 M 39 I 180 II 274 III 258 IV 357 Ezekiel’s ministry in Because Ezekiel was dumb for 7.5 years (5-4-5 to 5-10-12) he had to deliver most of his message to Today, Yahweh speaks to us plainly and through signs and wonders; the Scriptures teach right from wrong in plain language but Christ also makes us think by giving us parables to decipher. We are taught by commandments, rules and rituals, parables and prophecies, and through characters and stories. In Jeremiah Yahweh rebuked and told Judah to turn from idols and their wicked ways; in Ezekiel, He encourages us to think, learn and intelligently love and serve Him by deciphering signs and parables. Some people need to be told how to worship God, some need to work it out and others need both ways. God and Christ appeal to our reason and need for specific instruction. In vv.3-10 Ezekiel tells the Parable of the “great eagle” vv.11-21 reveals the parable’s meaning: Zedekiah broke his word vv. 22-24 show how Christ manifested the righteousness that escaped Now that we’ve read chapter 17, we will examine the interpretation in vv.11-21 alongside the parable’s statement in vv.3-10. 3 … Thus saith The Lord Yahweh; A great eagle with great wings, longwinged, full of feathers, which had divers colours, came unto Lebanon, and took the highest branch of the cedar: 4 He cropped off the top of his young twigs, and carried it into a land of traffick; he set it in a city of merchants. 11 Moreover the word of Yahweh came unto me, saying, 12 Say now to the rebellious house, Know ye not what these things mean? tell them, 12 … Behold, the king of “a great eagle” describes a mighty power that fears no-one and terrifies people near and far. Nebuchadnezzar was Yahweh’s servant ad ruled the then known world: Jer 27:6 I have given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar the king of “great wings, full of feathers” decribes Nebuchadnezzar’s dominance. “divers colours” margin = embroidering 1Chron 29:2 David said that he had prepared “glistering stones of divers colours, and all manner of precious stones” – gems for the temple that Solomon would build. In Eze 16:10,13,18 the same word describes the embroidered linen in the tabernacle. “highest branch of the cedar” – the cedar tree signifies the royal house of David, cedar dominated the temple and cedar represents elevated people, either kings or saints (Psa 92:12). “top young twig” was Jehoiachin, his princes and the “good figs”, the priests and tradesmen who were taken to 5 He took also of the seed of the land (Zedekiah), and planted it in a fruitful field ( 13 And hath taken of the king’s seed (King Zedekiah), and made a covenant with him, and hath taken an oath of him: he hath also taken the mighty of the land: “planted in a fruitful field” Zedekiah was given every opportunity to obey God and prosper. Jeremiah ministered to him and many times exhorted him to submit to Nebuchadnezzar and he would live. 6 And it grew, and became a spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned toward him, and the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought forth branches, and shot forth sprigs. 14 That the kingdom might be base, that it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it might stand. Zedekiah was a weak vassal king; he “turned his branches towards” Nebuchadnezzar but he was unfaithful to the conditions that Nebuchadnezzar placed on him. Notice in v.6 that Zedekiah ‘the vine” had shoots and roots and the potential for fruit. Isa 5:4 What could have been done more to my vineyard, that I have not done in it? wherefore, when I looked that it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes? … 7For the vineyard of Yahweh of hosts is the house of 7 There was also another great eagle with great wings and many feathers (but no divers colours): and, behold, this vine did bend her roots toward him, and shot forth her branches toward him, that he might water it by the furrows of her plantation. 15 But he (Zedekiah) rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar in sending his ambassadors into Zedekiah’s worst sin was not “keeping Nebuchadnezzar’s covenant, the promise he made with the king of The other “great eagle” in those days was Pharaoh-Hophra who said “my river is mine own, and I have made it for myself” (Eze 29:3). Pharaoh’s pride tempted Zedekiah to disobey Nebuchadnezzar. For this, God gave Jer 37:4 Jeremiah came in and went out among the people: for they had not put him into prison. 5Then Pharaoh’s army was come forth out of v.15 “ambassadors to 8 It was planted in a good soil by great waters, that it might bring forth branches, and that it might bear fruit, that it might be a goodly vine. The aim was fruit but Zedekiah never produced any because they were the “bad figs” – Yahweh did not make them bad, they were wicked by choice, Yahweh just divided them into two groups and took the “good figs” to God gave 9 … thus saith The Lord Yahweh; Shall it prosper? shall not he [Nebuchadnezzar] pull up the roots thereof, and cut off the fruit thereof, that it wither? it shall wither in all the leaves of her spring 10 Yea, behold, being planted, shall it prosper? shall it not utterly wither, when the east wind (of Yahweh’s judgments Psa.48) toucheth it? it shall wither in the furrows where it grew. 16 As I live, saith The Lord Yahweh, surely in the place where the king dwells that made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant he brake, even with him in the midst of Babylon he shall die. 17 Neither shall Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company help him in the war … 18 Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand, and hath done all these things, he shall not escape. 19 Therefore thus saith The Lord Yahweh; As I live, surely mine oath that he hath despised, and my covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head. When Zedekiah “despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when he had given his hand” is equivalent to “despising and breaking Yahweh’s covenant”. 20 I will spread my net upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare, and I will bring him to We are reminded time and again that covenants are inviolate, they are binding for life and just as the covenant victim died to seal the promise, so death is the recompense for covenant breakers. Remember Jesus’ words … Matt.8:11 “I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. 12But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Matt.25:30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 31When the Son of man shall come in his glory … Zedekiah was doubly cast into “outer darkness” – when he was judged at Riblath, his sons were executed in front of him, his eyes were put out and he went into the darkness of Babylonian exile where he died. All because he was unfaithful to his covenant. Yahweh is very clear on covenants. Christ’s mercy will not save covenant breakers. vv.22-24 A ray of hope breaks the darkness – “the highest branch” is Jesus Christ, the king of righteousness. 22 Thus saith The Lord Yahweh; I will also take of the highest branch of the high cedar, and will set it; I will crop off from the top of his young twigs a tender one, and will plant it upon an high mountain and eminent: 23 In the mountain of the height of This is the “highest branch of the high cedar”. Jesus is the best “young twig”, the “tender one” who Yahweh will plant and raise for Himself. “Let thy hand be upon the man of thy right hand, upon the son of man [the branch] whom thou made strong for thyself” Psa.80:15,17. “the tender one” takes to Isa.53:1-2 ”for he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of dry ground”. When it came to guile and pride, Jesus was a “tender plant”, untouched by the ways of men. Morally, he was “holy, harmless, undefiled and separate from sinners”. He stands as our model to follow. There is a subtle but significant change in the text; in v.8, of Zedekiah He said, “he might bring forth branches, fruit and a goodly vine”. In vv.22-23 God says that “I shall” achieve My will. This promise is repeated in Ezek.21:25 And thou, profane wicked prince of Israel, Zedekiah, whose day is come, when iniquity shall have an end, 26Thus saith The Lord Yahweh; Remove the diadem, and take off the crown: this shall not be the same: exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. 27I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it: and it shall be no more, until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him. The phrase, “in the mountain of the height of Jesus will “be a goodly cedar” Jesus Christ is both a great mountain and a majestic tree that protects and feeds all living. The cedar tree symbolizes immortal righteousness – and is the “sure mercies of David” to us. It reminds us of Dan.2:44 and Dan.4:10-17 because the king who will rule over the kingdom of men is Jesus the glorified Son of God. “all fowl of every wing” The victory of Jesus Christ’s life, his resurrection and return to earth makes him greater than both these “great eagles”. The mightiest of kings come and go – even “the head of gold”, but Jesus Christ endures forever. Jesus has made a covenant with us by sacrifice: he gave his body and blood for us. We are sanctified and accepted because he “put away sin by the sacrifice of himself” and purchased us with his blood and obedience. We have a far better covenant than the one Zedekiah made with Nebuchadnezzar because that covenant lasted only as long as they lived. And if that covenant, a man’s covenant, was enforced by death; then Jesus Christ’s covenant, which is founded on his sacrifice forever, is far more binding and eternal. 24 And all the trees of the field shall know that I Yahweh have brought down the high tree, have exalted the low tree, have dried up the green tree, and have made the dry tree to flourish: I Yahweh have spoken and have done it. We are “trees of the field” and we know what great things God and His Son have done for us. He has made us fruitful in Christ. We know that the covenant, God’s oath and our vows are binding for life. We have accepted Yahweh’s invitation to share His covenant and His blessings. Let us now share the bread and wine of his peace offering and live as ”dry trees that now flourish” because Yahweh has spoken to us, invited us and done His good pleasure in our lives. Best of all, let us commit to keep his covenant by eating “the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth”. Carl Hinton [Bedford (United Kingdom)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Carl |
||||||||||
17:3 ‘the highest branch of the Cedar’ was Jehoiakim who was taken captive – 2Kin 24:12 by the Babylonians. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 13
v.3 - As always, repentance is at the very centre of the requirement placed
upon us. Matt.3:2,10-12,
Luke 24:47, Acts 2:38-40, 3:19, Rev.2:21-22 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
13:27
depart ... workers of iniquity Psalm 6:8 14:1
'They watched him ...' marks the reason for the invitation |
||||||||||
| 13:25
Matthew 25:10,11,12 13:27 Matthew 25:12 13:34-35 Matthew 23:37-39 In this chapter Jesus presents ideas relating to being prepared for the kingdom. He builds some of this language into a parable for the disciples (Matthew 25) to reinforce this message a few months later. 14:7
Matthew 23:6 These two quotations mark the end of the language in this section which Jesus uses again to rebuke the scribes and Pharisees on the last day of his public ministry (Matthew 23) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| WILL MANY BE
SAVED? It is interesting to see that when Jesus was asked, "Lord, are only a few people going to be saved?", Jesus reply was one that did not directly answer the question. Instead of continuing with the train of thought that came from the questioner as they wondered how many people would be saved, Jesus changed the focus from thoughts about others to thoughts about ourselves. If we have ever asked the same question, we still do not know whether one in two, ten or one hundred will be saved, but what we do know is that we have a personal responsibility to make every effort to enter in through the narrow door. At the time of the kingdom we will be able to rejoice with Jesus over those who are there and saved with us. But for now, rather than looking around us and counting the people who will or won't be saved, we should put all our energies into making sure that we are one of the ones who will be saved. We have our own life to live, our own story to write. No-one else's destiny should be any of our business (apart from encouraging them to chose life). It would be a shame if we spent so much of our energy determining the fate of others that we missed out ourselves. So let's take to heart the instruction of Jesus and "make every effort to enter in through the narrow door, because many, I tell you, will try to enter and will not be able." Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
13:29 The mention and ordering of east west north south picks up God's promise to Jacob (Genesis 28:14) and is, therefore, not a general point. ch. 14 - We are now less than six months away from the crucifixion so we have to conclude that the 'chief Pharisee' (:1) had invited Jesus for a meal to find fault with him and his teaching. This is borne out by the way the narrative unfolds. Consider the pressure Jesus had to deal with - being constantly exposed to his critics. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Just as Jesus
had earlier described himself in a parable as the "strong man" who would
come against a house, in 12
v39-40 he portrays himself as a thief who would come in an hour the master
of the house would not expect. The two parables are the same. The master of the
house is the strong man who gaurded it (11v21),
and the coming of the thief is the coming of the stronger man. The house or palace
is Jerusalem, Israel, the vineyard, the fig tree. Those guarding, protecting,
pruning, or keeping the place are the Pharisees, Lawyers, Scribes, and Saducees.
The coming of the intruder, thief, strong man, son, is the coming of Jesus in
AD70. He would come and find them beating their fellow servants, being fruitless,
and trusting in the law and their own strength. He would destroy them.
This house, the subject of so many of his parables, was to be left to them desolate (13 v35).
Have you ever noticed how often the good works of Jesus incited people to anger? (e.g. 13v14). Was Jesus, by his good works, judging people by their own reaction to him? (see John 3v20) Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| 14:34 In quoting his own words ( Matt 5:13) Jesus is restating teaching from the beginning of his ministry - and now we see what Jesus meant in the sermon n the mount. Anyone who says he will follow Jesus but does not live up to his promise is like tasteless salt. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.33 Though what was demanded of the young ruler is not required of everyone, in one way or another God wants each one of us to surrender themself to him, serving him wholeheartedly according to the talents he has been given. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
14:26 ‘yea and their own life’ is quoted by Jesus – Rev 12:11, so Jesus’ words here give us an insight into how to understand the language in Rev 12:11. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.10 The advantage of taking the lowest place, is that from there, the only direction one can go is "UP". John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
14:34,35 Salt is a preservative which has the quality of being hygroscopic (ability to absorb water from the air). Being the salt of the earth implies absorbing the water of the Word (Matt 5:12). Jesus was the Word made flesh ( John 1:14). Following Jesus' commandments ensures hydration (John 7:38). Failing to absorb water makes salt a useless commodity. Failing to absorb the water of the Word renders one useless as a follower the Lord.Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
14:5 Jesus doubtless knew why the man was there and why he had been invited. He knew that what he did would cause conflict. Rather than wait for a reaction he addressed the thoughts of the hearts of the Pharisees. They were not able to answer him – verse 6. By taking the initiative Jesus silenced his critics before they could say a word against him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 13:14 The ruler of the synagogue was truly a hypocrite, for though he was angry with Jesus, he was critical of the crowd. He probably lacked the nerve to attack Jesus personally. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
13:6-9 The parable of the fig tree is talking about Israel. For three years Jesus had been preaching. Israel had not responded favorably to His teaching (not borne fruit).Yahweh, who is the planter of the fig tree is saying to cut it down; but the dresser (Jesus) says to leave it for another year and he will keep trying to encourage the tree to produce fruit. If after this time it fails to produce fruit, cut it down. Actually, Jesus had only another six months to try, according to the Seventy-Weeks' prophecy of Daniel (Dan 9:26 ). He failed to convince the nation, who in turn, caused His crucifixion (the Lord was cut off according to Daniel).Thus, the planter of the fig tree (Yahweh) would now destroy the vine (Israel). This happened in 70 AD with the destruction of Jerusalem, and the subsequent events which scattered the nation into exile. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
14:2,4,34 Water retention seems an interesting consideration here. First, is the man suffering from dropsy (excess water in the body). The Lord addressed and cured this unhealthy condition. But, then, the Lord talked about retaining water by keeping saltiness (see my previous note on salt). The Lord desires to get rid of excess moisture (things synonymous with the flesh); whilst seeking to promote spiritual hydration (through the water of the Word). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
14:15 In saying ‘Blessed is he that shall eat bread in the kingdom of God.’ The man was doubtless thinking of himself. However the ensuing parable shows that presence at the feast was n guarantee of a blessing. Those who made excuses about repentance would be barred from the marriage. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
13:13 Jesus was going to make the crooked straight – Isa 40:3. We might have thought that Isaiah was speaking of a road. However he is speaking symbolically about the healing work of Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
13:1 This verse is a reference to the rebel Judas who incited his followers not to pay taxes to Rome (Acts 5:37). There is no other reference (either Biblical or secular) to the blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. 13:2,4 These people died according to time and chance (Ecc 9:11,12). Jesus debunked the Jewish myth that people necessarily suffered calamity as a direct result of sin. The Pharisees espoused this idea, for example, when they deemed the blind man who had received his sight, a sinner since birth. In other words, the Pharisees claimed that his blindness was the direct result of sin (John 9:34). 14:26 Jesus is not advocating that his followers hate their families in the sense of violently disliking them or showing enmity towards them. This would contradict His commandments to show love to all (Matt 5:43,44). The word hate is translated from the Gr. miseo which can mean detest, but which can also mean love less. It is in this sense of comparison that the Lord uses the word. Love for Jesus should take precedent over love for all else. By extension, the love of the spiritual family in Christ (His ecclesia) should take precedence over the love for natural families. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
13:16 The woman who was loosed from her bondage shows a fulfilment of Isa 61:1 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||