|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.8-10
- It is an arbitrary choice of verses, as so many times we read the same thing.
It does go to prove though that God does allow man to make his own decisions.
When we ask 'Why does God allow suffering?', given that we know the evil to be
of man, not God, we can answer 'He always has, Why do we not learn?' Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.3-4
There are a number of kings who 'did that which was right' but still allowed the
'high places' to remain 1 Kings 15:11-14 Asa 1 Kings 22:43 Jehoshophat 2 Kings 12:2-3 Jehoash 2 Kings 14:3-4 Jehoahaz 2 Kings 15:1-4 Azariah 2 Kings 15:34-35 Jotham 2 Kings 23:2-13 Josiah This is contrasted with Hezekiah who removed the high places 2 Kings 18:1-4. How often do we have our own 'high places' in our hearts. Issues which we have never really sorted out in our own lives? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.3,9
- It is interesting and important to note that in God's eyes all of these kings
were either good or evil. This is true of every one of us. If we are not seen
by God as being good, we are declared evil. There is no middle path, except maybe
that mentioned by Bro. Peter below of being good but not removing the high places.
What do we make of this in our lives? I'm sure all of us would rather be 'Hezekiah's'
in God's sight. Let us give ourselves wholeheartedly - Rom.12:1,2 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :5
Uzziah was stuck with leprosy because he presumed to offer incense before God
(2
Chronicles 26:19-21). Whilst the Kings account does not mention this we should
not forget the presumption of Uzziah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 15:4-5
When one tries to develop a time line of the kings of Judah and Israel and develop
a picture of their contemporary reigns one meets all sorts of seeming contradictions
and discrepancies. The way that Jotham was co-regent with his leprous father is
one of the reasons for the difficulties but also provides an explanation why the
numbers do not seem to match in places. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 15:5 When Uzziah was struck with leprosy he ceased rulership, passing it on to his son Jotham taking over the reigns of rulership. He finally became king in his own right when he was 16 years old (2Kin 15:33) implying that Uzziah was struck with leprosy quite late in his 52 year reign. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.37 This is the first intimation of the hostile feeling of the kings of Israel and Syria, to Judah, which led them to form an alliance and make joint preparations for war. (2Chron 27:5) However, war was not acually waged till the reign of Ahaz. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Azariah, king of Judah, (2Kin 15:1-7), is the same as Uzziah in today's chapter (2Kin 15:13,30-34), and in 2Chron 26 and in Isa 6:1. He had leprosy, and Jothan his son actually reigned while his father was unclean. There's a lovely connection here with Isa 6:1. If leprosy is a type of sin, then when sin died (ie when Uzziah died), Isaiah saw a most wonderful vision of the Kingdom, with Jesus sitting on the throne. We know that it was Jesus because of the comment in John 12:37-41.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
| V.37 At the end of this chapter, which quickly chronicles several kings, comes Ahaz. There is an interesting situation involving himself, Rezin, and Pekah which we shall read about tomorrow. This is particularly interesting because it involves a prophecy of Isaiah (Isa 7). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
15:4 Like Amaziah in the previous chapter Azariah (who is Uzziah) did not remove the high places even though he was a good king. And the people worshipped on the high places. We must et a good example to others. It is not good enough leading a Godly life but not taking account of the needs of our brethren and sisters. We must try to create an environment where they will not be tempted by the things which we allow. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
15:12 The word which had been spoken by Jehu is recorded in 2Kin 10:30 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.13 Uzziah is a contracted form of Azariah and means the Lord is my strength. Vs.19,29 The Assyrian kings were now becoming progressively more active in the affairs of Israel. Pul is mentioned. It is debateable whether Pul is the same person as Tilgath-Pileser II, or his predecessor. Tilgath-Pileser II reigned from 745-727 BC and had skirmishes with Israel that were not so grave. However, his successor, Shalmaneser IV imposed a three-year siege on Samaria which inflicted great hardship. Shalmanezer IV died in 722 BC, and it was his successor, Sargon, who completed the siege in 721 BC. Sargon came to power at the same time that Merodach Baladan ascended to the Babylonian throne. Sargon, also, took into captivity almost 28,000 people from Israel. Sargon was the father of Sennacherib. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
15:25 This ‘Pekah’ is the one mentioned in Isa 7:1 as confederate against Judah so we should be aware of this historical record when we read Isaiah 7 at least. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.5 The Chronicles' account tells us the reason for Azariah’s leprosy (2Chron 26:16). V.8 Jeroboam II had reigned for forty-one years. His reign brought the most prosperity that Israel had experienced. During his reign, the prophets Hosea, Joel, Amos, and Jonah (who was cited in yesterday’s reading) operated. Zachariah, by contrast, only reigned six months and accomplished nothing. Between the death of Jeroboam II and the reign of his son Zachariah, there was an interregnum (period of time between two successive rulers) of about ten years. During an interregnum, a regent is appointed to oversee the affairs of state in lieu of a monarch. Vs.9,10 Zachariah followed evil after his forefather Jeroboam I. He was assassinated, which brought an end to the line of Jeroboam I. Amos’ words were fulfilled (Amos 7:9). V.12 With the death of his great grandson Zachariah, Jehu’s line had now been extinguished according to promise, after the fourth generation on the throne (2Kin 10:30). V.13 The murderer of Zachariah, and the fulfiller of prophecy was Shallum. Interestingly, Shallum means retribution. Shallum reigned only one month before he was assassinated by Menahem. Menahem reigned for ten years. V.22 Pekahiah, Manahem’s son reigned for two years before he was assassinated by his captain Pekah. V.29 Now the Assyrians are becoming involved in the affairs of Israel and Judah. Tomorrow, we shall see the unfolding of prophecy given by Isaiah. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
15:23 Pekahiah is one of the two kings – Isa 7:16– that is mentioned. He associated with Syria to threaten Judah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
15:23 Pekahiah is one of the two kings – Isa 7:16– that is mentioned. He associated with Syria to threaten Judah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.
14 - The phrase 'all that pass by' is used in the same context in Psa.89:41
Lam 2:15. It is the ultimate degradation and yet still they did not repent. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
v.1 - 4 This enacted parable marks the ways in which Israel are to be scattered. That Jesus says 'the very hairs of your head are numbered' Luke 12:7 picks up the fact that the hairs in Ezekiel represented the children of Israel who God knows individuals. The scattering of the Jews was, as well as punishment, was because God cared for them and was seeking their repentance. v.10 The horrible description of the abominations that are to take place were predicted - Deuteronomy 28:53 as punishment for turning away from keeping the Law of Moses. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.1-4
- As well as Bro. Peter's comment below, we might also consider the implication
of the cutting of the hair as violating the Nazarite vow (which we each have taken
spiritually at baptism) and learn the lessons for ourselves that Isreal did not
learn for themselves. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 5:12
In warning of the 'famine, pestilence and sword' Ezekiel - who uses this language
7 times, is presenting the same message and his contemporary prophet Jeremiah
who used the same language in Jerusalem some 15 times (Jeremiah
14:12 21:7, 9 24:10 27:8, 13 29:17, 18 32:24, 36 34:17 38:2 42:17, 22 44:4) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 5:14
That Israel were to be a 'reproach' echoes the curses (Deuteronomy
28:37) - be alert for the other quotations from the curses of Deuteronomy
28 and Leviticus 26 as you work through the prophecy of Ezekiel. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 5:11 In saying that His eye will not pity God is setting the scene for how Ezekiel is to behave ( 9:5) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.5 The spiritual position of Israel at the centre of the nations is paralleled by her geographical location. She was, and is today, at the hub of three continents; in a very real sense the centre of the earth Thus Israel was placed as a witness to the goodness of God at the centre of the nations. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| V.11 Because Israel had defiled the LORD'S sanctuary with detestable idols and all their abominations, the LORD would withdraw and His eye would have no pity, and He would not spare His people from death and destruction. (Psa 107:19) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
Vs.1-3 Ezekiel is enacting the end of a Nazarite vow (Num 6:18). The nation which was once (and ought to be still) separate unto Yahweh is now disavowed. The behavior of the nation has now alienated it from the grace of Yahweh. And so, Ezekiel demonstrated the proportioning of his shaved hair to various treatments as indicative of the nation's fate: part to be destroyed in the city; part to be killed in conflict; part to be scattered into exile. And there was another part: a remnant of faithful to be saved. Amongst widespread wickedness there have always been a few faithful whom Yahweh has saved. We are in a similar position, surrounded by wickedness, and needing deliverance by Yahweh (2Thess 3:2,3). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Jerusalem’s punishment was to be seen by surrounding nations (Eze 5:14,15). Whereas when Israel came out of Egypt, and walked for 40 years in the wilderness, God punished them in private. Everyone aged 20 and above who came out of Egypt (apart from Caleb and Joshua), died before they crossed the Jordan into the promised Land. But who noticed? Num 1:46 is virtually the same as Num 26:51. That time the surrounding nations would not know what was happening. Now, when Jerusalem is to be destroyed in Ezekiel’s day, everyone is to know.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
5:17 Ezekiel speaks of ‘sword famine and pestilence’ and so is presenting the same message which Jeremiah had predicted many times before the Jews were taken captive – Jer 14:12 etc: - Jeremiah uses the words 15 times out of the 24 times the words are used together in the whole of Scripture – Ezekiel uses the words 7 times so we can see how these are thematic phrases in these two prophets. Jeremiah who warned of impending judgment and Ezekiel who was in Babylon as part of that judgment. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
5:13 There is a strange irony that God who will ‘comfort Zion’ Isa 51:3 is going to be comforted Himself when Judah is finally delivered into captivity. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.12 Yahweh predicted that He would destroy two-thirds of His people and scatter one third. Israel will experience the same ratio of destruction and survival in the end times. The Lord Jesus will save them upon His return to earth (Zech 13:8,9). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
5:2 In saying that He would call for a sword against Israel the prophet is quoting Lev 26:33 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
-
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
5:15 In that God’s judgements would be an ‘instruction’ to the nations round about Israel we see that the way that Israel behaved reflected upon their God. The same is true of our behaviour. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v 5-10 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Was overturned>History of fulfilment Go to Deut 28:49 to see more details of the history of Israel and its overturning. Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
V.7 Jerusalem and Judah had not only emulated the idol worship of those nations round about, but had shown an unquenchable thirst and lust for idolatry not experienced by the surrounding nations. V.10 Cannibalism had been predicted as one of the curses that would come upon Israel should they sin (Deut 28:53). Vs.14,15 This answers to the curse of Deut 28:37. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| We can get caught up in the horror of these words and not recognise the beacon of hope and comfort held in v3. It's a small verse with a big message, and for those who draw near to God it's the only verse in this chapter that has any direct application. No matter what happens to the world in terms of it's judgement, the faithful will be spared because they are bound up with Christ. So if we are associated with Jesus by baptism, we are bound up with him, and because he is saved, we will be saved too (John 6:37-40). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
5:15 ‘reproach’ and ‘taunt’ catches the promise of the judgements of God spoken of in Deut 28:37 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.41,67
- Both of John's parents were, at some stage, filled with the Spirit. This seems
to be a transient arrangement, and in Zacharias' case, it caused him to prophesy.
This is the beginning of the fulfilment of Joel
2:28, it would seem. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:17
to turn the hearts ... children Malachi 4:5 The lists for
the rest of the chapters will not be as extensive as this one. It is the case
that these are far more quotations in this chapter than in all the rest. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 1:32
The promise that Jesus would sit 'on the throne of his father David' shows that
the promises [to David on this occasion] are not simply doctrines to accept. They
form the solid foundation upon which future events rest. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :39
This verse tells us which city of the priests Elizabeth and Zacharias lived. It
was Hebron - The quotation from Joshua
21:11 proves this. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| You're a priest
in the high-priestly line of Aaron. Your wife is a daughter of Aaron. You're both
faithful followers of God. Blameless in the keeping of the law. There could be
no better breeding stock than this. You are pedigree.
The stage is set. You enter the holiest of holies to offer up incense for the sins of the people. Thousands of people are in the courtyard of the temple praying for forgiveness and salvation. An angel of God appears, shining, splendid, and magnificent, announcing that your prayer has been answered. You think "which prayer?". The one for the people, or my own daily prayer for a son? Then your heart leaps when you think of an echo to these words - the angel who came to Sarah, barren and old, announcing the birth of a son of promise!! What else could it be! This is it! I'm going to be the father of the messiah! Then the words, cutting in their disapointment. "and he shall go before him...to make ready a people prepared for the Lord". Then the mistake of showing your own un-belief "How shall I know this? For I am an old man..". And the rebuke of the mighty Angel of God "I am Gabriel, who stands in the presence of God!!..." and the punishment "you will be mute... because you did not believe my words." John, in all his glory, signified an old, barren, fruitless priesthood, which could never bring life, because the one thing that was lacking was faith. The bearing of the holy seed went instead to a teenage girl, accused later of adultery, and shunned by society. Why? "Blessed is she who believed...those things which were told her from the Lord" (v45). This son was to be a son of Abraham, who believed what God told him, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| 1:15 Whereas John was to 'drink no wine' and to be 'filled with the Holy Spirit' the believer by comparison is to (Eph 5:18) 'be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit;' Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.:69 There is nothing petty about Zechariah. Note how his thoughts and thanksgivings turn from his own child to that other Child, the One from the house of David. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| V.15 It was recently pointed out to us, just how powerful the words were that Gabriel spoke to Zacharias telling him of the son that his wife Elisabeth would bear him. (John the Baptist). The key is "great" " megas 3173 It was also used by the angel as he spoke to Mary(V.32) when describing the One she would give birth to. This is the same word that is used in the title of the Greek leader "Alexander the Great" John is being compared to the greatest leader there had been up to this time in history. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Luke 1:19 - This is the same language as employed in Dan 9:21-23 which introduces the 70 weeks prophesy. Thus it suggests Jesus is the fulfillment of that prophesy. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
Luke's gospel forms the third synoptic (seeing together) gospel account with Matthew and Mark. It equates with the prophecy of Ezekiel as it emphasizes the Lord's humanity (symbolized by the face of a man, one of Ezekiel's living creatures Eze 1:10). Gabriel, whose name means Warrior of God is concerned with heralding the Messiah. It would not be inconsistent to think that Gabriel would be the one to herald the Lord's return (1Thess 4:16). Gabriel's name is significant also in the fact that Yahweh Sabaoth is the God of hosts (armies) (Isa 1:9; Rom 9:29). Gabriel will be instrumental with the Lord in destroying His enemies when he returns. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| V.3 Theophilus means friend of God. It is unclear to whom the name is referring. Ideas range from the generic believer in the Gospel to a high-ranking official whose identity Luke is trying to protect. Regardless, it is Luke's account of the Gospel which is the most important thing. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:28 When Mary was told that she was "highly favoured" we have a stark contrast with Gen 3:16 were Eve was told of the sorrow of childbirth. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:3 The claim to ‘perfect understanding’ is a claim to be inspired – John 14:26 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| As we begin to read through the record recorded for us by Luke we see the detail that he has recorded for us that was not mentioned by the other writers. A few examples that come to mind, and there are many others. In the record of the transfiguration, he is the only one that tells us that Moses and Elias spoke of his decease which he should accomplish at Jerusalem. Luke also tells us that the widow of the city of Nain son, was her only son. The lunatic boy who Christ healed was his father's only son. We again see the same detail when we go to the record of the healing of Jairus' daughter, she was his only daughter. While we know that it was the Spirit of our Heavenly Father that controlled the writing of the record of all four gospel writers, we feel this shows us a lot about Luke. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
Vs.32,33 Gabriel's promise to Mary is worth emphasizing: He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever; his kingdom will never end. This statement clearly shows that: - Jesus is the Son of God (and not God the Son, as the Trinitarians erroneous claim) (Rom 1:4). - Jesus will reign on earth and not in heaven (thus, the reward of the faithful is here and not above the clouds) (Luke 11:2). - The Nation of Israel still figures in the plans of Yahweh (and has not been utterly condemned and dismissed as some claim) (Mic 7:18). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:3 ‘Most excellent’ is a title used of Roman officials – Acts 23:23, 24:3, 26:25 – implying that this gospel was sent to a roman official. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.32,33 The scriptures could not be more plain in telling us that Jesus is coming back to earth to rule (See Isa 9:6,7). The reward of His faithful followers will be to rule with him (Rev 20:6). The so-called reward of souls floating off to heaven, at death, is nowhere to be found in scripture. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:3‘from above’ <509> is a word which is elsewhere translated at ‘from the top’ Mark 15:38‘from Above’ John 19:11. The John reference in particular shows that the word can be used to speak of God given. Thus we see that Luke is claiming that his writing is from God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.31 The name Jesus is the Greek form of the Hebrew Yeshua which means Yahweh saves. Vs.46-55 Mary’s song parallels Hannah’s song (1Sam 2:1-10). Samuel was a Christ-type. Like Jesus, He was a son of promise; and a Nazarite, wholly dedicated to the service of Yahweh. V.60 John is the Greek form of the Hebrew Yochanan, (a contraction of Yechochanan meaning gift of God). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Luke 1:31-33 First Principles>Sure mercies of David>King Jesus, son of David is also the Son of God. For more about the King, go to 2Sam 7:12-16 Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
1:6 That both Elizabeth and Zacharias were ‘both righteous’ is a wonderful model for a husband and wife team of believers. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||